Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

This is a legitimate question with good points on both sides. If you release a treatment to early, it may have risks, and cost lives or other side effects. If there is a successful treatment, you could holding it back for the people who need it to get treatment. An example for me would be Thalidomide. (I realize morning sickness is not as serious as leukemia.) ONE woman at the FDA refused to approve it, which meant the U.S. had far less damage than Europe.
1 posted on 04/15/2025 11:35:40 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

Federal investment in the NIH and FDA — the cornerstones of American biomedical research — is facing increasing uncertainty.

They keep repeating that. But actual research is under no threat. But massive amounts of money were wasted in biowarfare, the faggotry, racial, and tranny aspect of everything. Researching guns as a “disease”. The medical research of the social justice aspects of BLM. The medical effects of an interstate cutting communities in half.
The well-being of prostitutes and porn stars. etc etc ad nauseum.

THAT waste makes it less likely that those lifesaving drugs will be invented.

This guy needs to change his thinking and get on the team.


2 posted on 04/15/2025 11:43:12 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2025... RETURN OF THE JEDI...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Isn’t there a right to try in law?

Shouldn’t this be seen as an important clinical step for study?

Volition is crucial imo.


3 posted on 04/15/2025 11:47:54 AM PDT by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Stop pretending that behavior issues have anything to do with medicine and you will eliminate a huge amount of the stupid waste.


4 posted on 04/15/2025 12:00:50 PM PDT by Seruzawa ("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Leukemia took my best friend when I was 10 and my Dad 13 years ago.


5 posted on 04/15/2025 12:01:28 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer” )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

‘Biomedical research saved my life’


Cancer research has killed countless people by pushing for ultra expensive experimental drugs while ignoring or even demonizing well proven anti cancer molecules like Ivermectin or Fenbendazole (Joe Tippens is the sole survivor among more than a thousand cancer patients in his clinical trial group, because he is the only one taking Fenbendazole).

So shut up, corrupt big pharma drone. Go to hell with your Fauci “research”.


6 posted on 04/15/2025 12:07:20 PM PDT by miniTAX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

“ Thalidomide. (I realize morning sickness is not as serious as leukemia.”

However, the children of the mothers who took this med may not feel the same way. Just horrific what that med did.


7 posted on 04/15/2025 12:14:45 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Your comment is non-sequitur vis-a-vis article content. A bit odd.

Concerning the article:

“ Federal investment in the NIH and FDA — the cornerstones of American biomedical research — is facing increasing uncertainty.”

What’s happening I think and hope is the opposite.

Funding will go to real research and not DEI related crap that has been sucking up NIH and HHS funds that should go to actual basic science and medical research.

Not paying salaries of administrators and pseudo scientists who get well paid to crank out endless surveys on “underserved communities” and myriad other non-scientific nonsense.


9 posted on 04/15/2025 12:20:17 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I don’t think the public cares so much about the $$$ as they do about the ethics that guided earlier medical practitioners that I grew up with. Right now we have people who took the mRNA genetic treatment (aka, clot shot) that creates the deadly ‘spikes’ that kills people, sooner than later. The ‘testing’ documentation mentions the possibility of shedding by skin cells, but didn’t pursue it because the clot-shot was supposed to stay in one spot, and stop manufacturing the spikes that kill the ‘virus’.

It doesn’t. But it likely sheds from skin cells as warned, then there are fluids shared among the major organs, as they get infected. And waste ejected. One little skin cell at a time. Inevitable depopulation?


11 posted on 04/15/2025 12:43:22 PM PDT by RideForever (Damn, another dangling par .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I was on a clinical trial (not cancer) and lost my colon.


12 posted on 04/15/2025 12:47:53 PM PDT by Karoo (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/duke-university-agrees-pay-us-1125-million-settle-false-claims-act-allegations-related

It took a whistleblower to bring a decade of fraudulent work to light. Duke is not alone, and better review is needed to police our money in real time.


13 posted on 04/15/2025 12:53:39 PM PDT by stateofit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway; DesertRhino

I work in healthcare in a blue state, and I got an anger inducing global email from our top executive today on this very subject that was heavily political, didn’t mention Trump by name, but the derogatory verbiage was worded in such a way that it was unmistakable.

I would never send emails like this to people who worked for me, but they seem to have no problem doing so. It is extremely disrespectful in my opinion.


14 posted on 04/15/2025 12:54:04 PM PDT by rlmorel ("A people that elect corrupt politicians are not victims...but accomplices." George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

why is the “research” neglecting food, lifestyle choices, non invasive or made up drugs with their usually harmful side effects?

oh because that might put a bunch of them out of business.

most disease is a lack of some thing the body needs to be balanced and fight it off. I know the body isn’t lacking chemo drugs and such.

so long as our medical community focuses on a body part or specific disease and not treat the body as a whole, many more people will die needlessly like so many already have.


23 posted on 04/15/2025 10:07:06 PM PDT by b4me (Pray, and let God change you. He knows better than you or anyone else, who He made you to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

The good doctor is conflating conducting effective research, with simply spending lots of money. Most of the government agencies along with the NGOs have become money pits where little effective research is conducted, and much of the money is distributed among cronies, relatives, and friends. A government bureaucracy is simply not an effective way of spending money wisely.

When a government agency is given a budget, and then that budget is increased significantly each year without any meaningful reviews of effectiveness, at some point most of the money gets wasted.


24 posted on 04/16/2025 4:54:25 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Freud: projection is a defense mechanism of those struggling with inferiority complexes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson