Posted on 04/11/2025 4:19:14 AM PDT by MtnClimber
An ongoing national legal dispute regarding vaccinations of children with COVID-19 shots concerns whether school officials are immune from traditional legal claims.
An ongoing national legal dispute regarding vaccinations of children with COVID-19 shots concerns whether school officials are immune from traditional legal claims -- particularly, battery -- when administering Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) shots without parental consent. North Carolina’s Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of parents for violating their informed consent rights in violation of a state statute. Still, even that court denied common law state claims for battery -- the physical touching of another against their will. The mainstream media has gaslit parents, claiming that public schools cannot legally force-vaccinate their children. But unless the child suffers serious bodily injury or death, they most certainly can under current rulings.
I represented the Politella family before the U.S. Supreme Court, which on February 24 declined to hear our Petition for Writ of Certiorari challenging a Vermont Supreme Court ruling that my clients, whose six-year-old son was vaccinated with a COVID-19 shot despite their clear wishes that he not be, had no right to sue for common law battery. Vermont’s Supreme Court decided that my clients’ rights are eclipsed by the federal Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, which provides legal immunity to pharmaceutical companies and those administering shots related to these experimental vaccines. The Act allows a federal administrative remedy only in the event the shot is 1) administered “willfully,” and 2) causes “death or serious bodily injury.”
In the absence of the PREP Act, parents could sue for traditional damages if their child is given medical treatments without their consent. The Vermont Court did not consider constitutional liberties to parental control or bodily integrity. This led to claims that the court’s ruling would permit forced jabs
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
SORRY, I guess I read to much.
the Comirnaty vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine) is still under emergency use authorization (EUA) for the 2024-2025 formula, which was updated on August 22, 2024. While Comirnaty received full FDA approval in August 2021, the 2024-2025 formula continues to be authorized under EUA.
Fully Approved UNDER EUA is not the same as Fully Approved. I thought the “emergency” was over, WTF????
The only emergency must be Big-Pharma not making Billions $$$$
If you’re calling today’s rush of so called “vaccines” to get into the public without proven success and long term negative affects, then you are seriously brainwashed. I mentioned the great vaccines of the past. Polio, tb, smallpox, etc. Real vaccines! Not the crap pushed by WHO and big pharma today. Maybe you work for them.
Omnivore-Dan wrote: “Not the crap pushed by WHO and big pharma today. Maybe you work for them.”
Maybe you work for the grifters pushing the snake oil remedies as substitute for the vaccines that save lives. Grifters like America’s Frontline Doctors or The Wellness Center.
Ok, troll.
Omnivore-Dan wrote: “If you’re calling today’s rush of so called “vaccines” to get into the public without proven success and long term negative affects, then you are seriously brainwashed. I mentioned the great vaccines of the past. Polio, tb, smallpox, etc. Real vaccines! Not the crap pushed by WHO and big pharma today. Maybe you work for them.”
Compare and contrast the safety and effectiveness testing for smallpox, polio, tb, and covid. Still not convinced you don’t work for the anti-vaccine grifters.
I don’t have to convince you of a damn thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.