Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Signs Executive Order to Revitalize U.S. Shipbuilding Amid China’s Maritime Dominance
G Captain.com ^ | April 9, 2025 | Mike Shuler

Posted on 04/10/2025 10:09:52 AM PDT by Miami Rebel

President Trump has signed an executive order on Wednesday aimed at revitalizing the domestic maritime and shipbuilding industries, including in the both the commercial and military sectors.

The initiative comes as U.S. shipbuilding capabilities have fallen dramatically behind China, with American shipbbuilders producing just 0.2% of the world’s ships compared to China’s 74%.

“We’re going to be spending a lot of money on shipbuilding. We’re way, way, way behind,” Trump stated from the Oval Office.

The executive order, titled Restoring America’s Maritime Dominance, establishes a comprehensive Maritime Action Plan (MAP), which is described as a coordinated strategy designed to strengthen U.S. maritime industries. A key component includes the creation of a Maritime Security Trust Fund, serving as the financial backbone of the plan, and a financial incentives program to stimulate private investment in domestic shipbuilding.

Current statistics paint a stark picture of China’s dominance in maritime manufacturing. The U.S. produces none of the containers used in global commodity transportation, while China manufactures 96%. Similarly, China builds 80% of ship-to-shore cranes used in U.S. ports, with no domestic production.

“We used to make so many ships. We don’t make them anymore very much, but we’re going to make them very fast, very soon. It will have a huge impact,” Trump stated.

Matthew Paxton, President of the Shipbuilders Council of America (SCA), expressed strong support for the initiative: “The establishment of a strategic commercial fleet program, along with new tax credits, grants, and strategic investments, will provide a powerful environment to rebuild our shipbuilding capacity and build the fleet of the future.”

The order addresses several critical areas, including directing the United States Trade Representative to tackle China’s anticompetitive practices in the shipbuilding sector. It takes direct aim at foreign competition by proposing tariffs on Chinese-made cranes and other cargo equipment under Section 301. It also aims to prevent the circumvention of Harbor Maintenance Fees through Canada or Mexico, ensuring proper revenue collection for maritime industry investments.

A key strategic element includes the implementation of Maritime Prosperity Zones, modeled after previously successful Opportunity Zones.

A new Office of Maritime and Industrial Capacity has been established at the National Security Council in the White House to oversee these initiatives. The order also includes provisions for expanding mariner training and education through investment in the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy.

Industry response has been positive. Eastern Shipbuilding Group, a Florida-based shipyard, welcomed the order, emphasizing its importance for America’s economic prosperity and security. The American Maritime Partnership highlighted the significance of maintaining a U.S.-flagged fleet built by American workers.

The order also addresses Arctic maritime security, with plans to develop strategies for securing Arctic waterways amid increasing foreign presence in the region. Additionally, it directs the Secretary of Defense to review and provide guidance on maintaining a robust inactive reserve fleet for military operations.

The Maritime Action Plan is the centerpiece of the Executive Order—a coordinated strategy to rebuild America’s shipbuilding might and reestablish its position as a global maritime power.

According to a draft EO seen by gCaptain, the action plan is a strategic, whole-of-government roadmap directed by the President to revitalize America’s maritime industrial base, grow the U.S.-flagged commercial fleet, and strengthen maritime national security.

The MAP is to be developed within 210 days by the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (APNSA) in coordination with key cabinet agencies—including Defense, Transportation, Commerce, Homeland Security, and Labor—and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). It will consolidate policy, budget, regulatory, legislative, and industrial recommendations outlined in the order into a single actionable document to guide long-term implementation. The Executive Order calls for the creation of a Maritime Security Trust Fund—a dedicated, reliable funding source that will serve as the financial backbone of this plan. The new funding mechanism aims to provide consistent support for long-term maritime programs and help stabilize a sector that has historically struggled with unpredictable funding cycles.

The trust fund will be instrumental in financing critical infrastructure upgrades, workforce development initiatives, and fleet expansion projects. Under the supervision of the OMB Director and Secretary of Transportation, the fund will draw from various revenue streams, including tariffs, port fees such as the Harbor Maintenance Fee, and other targeted tax sources. The fund will particularly support the new Shipbuilding Financial Incentives Program, along with crucial investments in ports and workforce training programs.

“Today, President Trump delivered a major step towards resurrecting America’s maritime industry and ushering in a golden age in American shipbuilding,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy. “For far too long, the federal government has neglected domestic shipbuilding, deferred critical investments, and allowed our premier U.S. Merchant Marine Academy to fall into disrepair. Thanks to President Trump’s leadership, we have a once in a generation opportunity to fix it and create a new wave of maritime jobs.”

The U.S. Department of Transportation is set to play a crucial role in the effort, with several key initiatives under its purview. Through MARAD (Maritime Administration), the department will establish a financial incentives program for shipbuilding, create Maritime Prosperity Zones to attract domestic and allied investments, develop strategies to increase demand for U.S. shipping, modernize the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy, and improve government procurement processes. MARAD will also work with federal agencies to establish a U.S. strategic commercial fleet goal of additional U.S. flagged vessel capacity for national security.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: shipbuilding
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
An admirable goal. It's going to take a lot of time and a lot of money (probably most in the form of direct government investment or in government-guaranteed loans.)
1 posted on 04/10/2025 10:09:52 AM PDT by Miami Rebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel

We need ships now. Partner with Korea and the Norwegians. Subsidize them to start there and here. The next war isn’t going to allow an industrial scale up like WW2. We will win or lose based on the assets at hand.


2 posted on 04/10/2025 10:29:55 AM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel

If you want ships, you need a robust steel industry. We either pour it ourselves or go begging to Japan and China.

You know there are fewer than 50 family-owned forges left in the US.


3 posted on 04/10/2025 10:42:28 AM PDT by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel

All ships need ‘iron dome’ drone fleets too. Ships now are too easy to take out with drones.


4 posted on 04/10/2025 10:45:58 AM PDT by GOPJ (Elites want the gravy train running ripping us off for NATO, Tariffs and bad trade deals. NO MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Drones or missiles. Drones are very easy to shoot down. They aren’t called “target drones” for nothing.


5 posted on 04/10/2025 10:47:35 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Excellent observation!


6 posted on 04/10/2025 10:47:38 AM PDT by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Flak cannons may be more cost effective.


7 posted on 04/10/2025 10:56:16 AM PDT by SPDSHDW (Execute Order 66....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Maine Mariner

Thanks Mariner


8 posted on 04/10/2025 11:05:36 AM PDT by GOPJ (Elites want the gravy train running ripping us off for NATO, Tariffs and bad trade deals. NO MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SPDSHDW; rlmorel
"Flak cannons may be more cost effective."

I believe I read where Hegseth said the Navy will be producing more Phalanx systems for more ships. Although short range, they act like flax with their massive amount of rounds they project..

9 posted on 04/10/2025 11:08:15 AM PDT by A Navy Vet (USA Birth Certificate - 1787. Death Certificate - 2021? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety
We will win or lose based on the assets at hand.

Blame Free Traitors™. If we have a war of attrition and can't make good on loses hunt down a Free Traitor™ and, you know what to do.

10 posted on 04/10/2025 11:11:46 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lurk

At the moment.


11 posted on 04/10/2025 11:34:42 AM PDT by Frank Drebin (And don't ever let me catch you guys in America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel
China's Maritime Dominance?

Isn't that a stretch?

12 posted on 04/10/2025 11:37:32 AM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel; rodguy911

bttt


13 posted on 04/10/2025 11:39:00 AM PDT by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel

Survival come with costs China is just waiting for one weak spot in time.


14 posted on 04/10/2025 11:46:23 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety

For the Arctic, partner with Finland which builds state of the art icebreakers faster & cheaper than anyone.

We also need more steel plants to make the steel needed for such a major ship building expansion, and relearn how to make hardened [ armored ] steel.


15 posted on 04/10/2025 11:59:58 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister

China’s Maritime Dominance? Isn’t that a stretch?

China has 225 times the US ship building capacity. The Chinese maritime fleet is huge, the US fleet is so small as to be insignificant.

We need to get more people into the Maritime Academy or rely on imported foreign-born to crew & skipper our ships.


16 posted on 04/10/2025 12:04:21 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Free trade is not the reason we don’t have enough warships or subs or a modern nuke force. Free trade is not the reason we have an undersized military without enough armament. Free trade is not the reason we now lack the capacity to build and produce these things. We have the capacity to modernize our bomber fleet but we don’t.

Nothing has prevented us from building these things except we chose butter lots and lots of butter over guns.

When the Soviets flooded the Communist Block with weapons, building a huge stockpile of munitions and missles, cranked up aircraft and ship production, and built a huge nuke force, we matched them and then went them one better.


17 posted on 04/10/2025 12:05:28 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety
Free trade is not the reason we don't have enough warships or subs or a modern nuke force. Free trade is not the reason we have an undersized military without enough armament. Free trade is not the reason we now lack the capacity to build and produce these things. We have the capacity to modernize our bomber fleet but we don't.

Free trade led to off shoring which devistated the shipping industry. I will not let a mealy mouthed globalist try to re-write history, at least not on my watch.

18 posted on 04/10/2025 12:18:36 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister

Commercial shipping


19 posted on 04/10/2025 12:24:42 PM PDT by Cold Heart (It's a good time to be ashamed to be a democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: central_va

The US government can start writing checks right now for warships. Lots of warships and they can be built here starting today. Capacity can be added and ramped up based on contracts. We don’t have proper capacity to make shells because the gov will not write contracts for long term production quotas.

We have never offshored our warship building. We simple do not buy enough of them. General Dynamics would be glad to build more boats. They could ramp up capacity and keep that capacity. If they had purchase orders.

If China seizes Taiwan and the South Pacific we win or lose, if we fight at all, based on the assets at hand. We will not have the political will to rearm and spend the money to fight a war of attrition involving billion dollar ships and 200
Million warplanes. Those things are not disposable Liberty Ships.

I am curious, what war of attrition do you envision? Who is the enemy and what is the theater of war?


20 posted on 04/10/2025 1:09:20 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson