Posted on 04/02/2025 12:00:25 PM PDT by Morgana
According to ShoutYourAbortion.com (yes, that is a real website), women who want children are the abnormal ones. For example, Syd, who identified herself as a convert to Catholicism, wrote, “Thanks to my abortion, I will have a future.” Another wrote, “Abortion gave me a chance to focus on my own life.” An anonymous college student stated, “My future was worth it, and I am more than just a vessel to produce new life.” She then compared her baby to a tumor standing between her and her career.
This website is among the legacies of a society now well into its fourth wave of feminism. Women see the procreative design of their bodies as a problem to be avoided or solved, not a gift of God. Between that consistent drumbeat and the celebrity voices equating abortion with “mercy” and insisting life without marriage and children is better (despite overwhelming research that suggests otherwise), it is no wonder that over one million women chose to end the life of their baby last year, 40% of young women think they should hold off having a baby until their career is established, and one-fifth of women say they would forego kids altogether for a career.
Many young women believe they will be happier if they remain single and without kids. Yet studies continue to show that the happiest people on average are women who are married with kids. In other words, there is an incredible gap between perception and reality. God designed humans for relationships. For most, that means marriage. He made women to be child bearers and mothers, uniquely equipping their bodies, hearts, and minds to be life-givers in this way. Scripture says that there is joy in following the precepts of the Lord, which align with God’s works in creation. If true, we ought to expect that living out God’s design will bring happiness. God’s burden is light, after all.
The fundamental ideas of the feminist movement, at least in its current form, is in direct contrast. Its adherents even find it necessary to re-write the lives of historical figures to align with their views. Thus, the new and improved Lady Jane Grey was a power-driven vixen who did not need a man, and Jane Austen even envisioned a nonbinary society. For historical figures to be considered great, they must have rejected repressive narratives of womanhood that value faith, family, or men.
This kind of feminism betrays women and is especially dismissive of the many who face infertility or who desire marriage and family in this culture that no longer values either. God made humans in his image, male and female. Though a woman’s value is not determined by marital or maternal status, who God designed woman to be can neither be erased nor can it be replaced by some progressive vision of “freedom,” careerism, or sexual autonomy.
The truth about women is, in reality, far more radical than the ideas so dominant in this cultural moment. Women are uniquely and wonderfully different from men. It should not be thought weird for women to desire to give life and then nurture and care for life. Women did this for Jesus throughout His life and at His death. The Bible portrays women as prophets, judges, and businesswomen, but also, in nearly every book of Scripture, as mothers and wives.
It is often said that being a wife and mother are the highest calling for women. It is not. Glorifying God, in whatever role or stage of life, is the highest calling of all image bearers. We are to do that in whatever station we find ourselves, as male or female, because that’s how God made us to live. Too many women have been told to fear the design that God blessed them with, or to fight it in the name of “freedom.” In this cultural moment, that fear has undermined the sacred roles granted to women within families. That’s a tragedy because God’s design of His image bearers, male and female, is, as Scripture has said, very good.
Before the pro-life movement really kicked off the media and left often called it “unviable tissue mass”.
That bunch should be the Church of the Contrary Ones.
That and scary rhetoric. I aint buying any.
Many feminist are psychotic and beneath contempt.
If I read it correctly, Cecile Richards was a radical feminist as well
Psychological consequences of abortion
Smoking, drug abuse, eating disorder, depression, attempted suicide, guilt, regret, nightmare, decreased self-esteem, and worry about not being able to conceive again were the questions asked from the respondents as the psychological consequences of abortion. At least one-third of the respondents have experienced one of the above mentioned psychological side effects (except suicide, drug abuse and smoking). “Depression” and “worry about not being able to conceive” and “eating disorder” were reported as dominant psychological consequences of abortion among the respondents with 60.5% and 53.6% and 48.7%, respectively. “Decreased self-esteem” (43.7%), “nightmare” (39.5%), “guilt” (37.5%), and “regret” (33.3%) have been placed in the lower steps respectively
From National Library of Medicine (an official US government site).((to be fair, this site also says many women also have psychological problems following childbirth)
Meme.
Joe: Can I give Jill and me a ride in your brand new Lamborghini?
Jill: That’s doctor Jill, moron.
In case someone missed the story from the past.
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/248615-second-secretly-recorded-planned-parenthood-video-fuels-storm/
For people not benefiting from the government’s support of abortion, here are some shopping tips about prices for the Planned Parenthood people.
The lowest priced Huracan starts around $249,865 and the Urus around $262,631, while the Revuelto starts at $608,358.
(The lowest priced Huracan starts around $249,865 and the Urus around $262,631, while the Revuelto starts at $608,358)
WOW 😲😳
I wouldn’t want to sleep in the same house as she did.
Unfortunately a significant percentage of the American population hold the same values of this deranged woman. They form the core of the Democratic Party. Put another way, there no longer exists a consensus of commonly held decent values that unites Americans.
This demonic “female” alleged— has it backwards. The aborted fetus was a Human Being- innocent from conception. The TUMOR is the “implanted bearer” (their term, btw, one of them) who has preserved her/she/it’s future as an ever larger non-benign Tumor.
Something to be proud of for her- no doubt.
Yes, but a salesperson will remind us “If you have to ask the price then you can’t afford it.”
May she find God before it’s too late.
It’s already been too late for her for some time now.
But they claim to believe in science.
This woman is just plain evil!
Democrats/leftists/feminists long since gave up the whole “Tumor” (or mass of cells that’s not a life) argument many years ago when they realized they wanted criminals charged for double homicide whenever a mother is murdered (which I also happen to agree with). Now, they will simply just say “my body, my choice”, which argumentatively simply tries to avoid any differentiation between the life of the mother and the life of the child.
“An anonymous college student stated, “My future was worth it, and I am more than just a vessel to produce new life.” She then compared her baby to a tumor standing between her and her career.” ‘You certainly are more than just a vessel to produce new life’, you’re a murderer.
“I’ve noticed that everyone who is
for abortion has already been born,”
Ronald Reagan
The best come back ever.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.