Posted on 04/02/2025 4:16:49 AM PDT by MtnClimber
I've never heard anything good about the United States Institute for Peace.
It's been in bed with neocons, coupmeisters, and the Soros color revolution crowd for years. The quasi-government agency that runs like a private NGO is always sneaky and non-transparent.
So it didn't surprise me a bit to learn that USIP showed unusual resistence to anyone poking into their spending from DOGE.
Did you hear how the staff as USIP acted when DOGE showed up?
They literally BARRICADED themselves in their offices, cut the phone lines and power to elevators, sabotaged office equipment and the Head of USIP had to be arrested & removed.
SNIP
According to a hostile, biased report from Newsweek:
Elon Musk has accused the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) of deleting a terabyte of financial data to "cover their crimes."
Musk reposted a claim from the Conservative page 'amuse' on X (formerly Twitter) which stated that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) had found USIP contracts going to Afghanistan's former chief of protocol, who had been a member of the Taliban, and to the Iraqi League for Youth.
Musk wrote on X: "They deleted a terabyte of financial data to cover their crimes, but they don't understand technology, so we recovered it."
Any government institution is most likely to be the opposite of its name
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Institute for a Bigger Piece of the Pie.
And that poser Woodward will choose to write a tell-all book about DOGE instead.
...and Big Balls lives up to his name
~Hillary Clinton has entered the chat....
Even Hillary Clinton’s people were smart enough to know that just deleting data or even formatting a hard drive doesn’t completely remove ways to recover the data... and I suspect they aren’t geniuses in her orbit.
Why would you delete a terebyte of financial data on your way out the door unless.......... (it’s so ridiculously obvious)...... you want to try to hide something.
That amount of data is not “house cleaning”. That’s a coverup.
It was not theirs to delete ... They were only employees ...
Can they please find their way over to the Clinton foundation.
No it would not take three days
Plus the computer’s events log should show who deleted the files. Frog march that person directly to jail, not passing “Go” and not collecting $200.
This is when you send the special ops team out to eliminate every single one of them at night over the next few days, ensuring that the employees were successful in eliminating any leaks themselves.
I wonder how the Constitution can defeat Marxism when they lie, cheat and steal and they are protected over the victims.
Only on Pain of Death can the sins against the constitution be enforced with deterrence the chocks the lifeblood of the Tree-of-Treason, diverting that sacred resource to the Tree-of-Liberty.
That is correct.
That is why I was wondering why they couldn’t find Hillary’s 33,000 e-mails.
WHEN are they going to start arresting people???
sounds like obstruction of justice charges are in order!
More winning.
There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
Depends on the medium it’s stored on and where it is being restored to. Tapes were still used back then. If it was not a geographically dispersed environment and hard disk arrays were being used...then no...not three days. Lots less by today’s current technology.
Big Balls wanted his internet name to be Carlos Danger but that name was already taken. LOL
Yup… and arrested.
The Blackberries her staff destroyed were government property. By law destroying those should have incurred 5 years in prison or a $10k fine. I never understood why prosecutors never used that as leverage to pry open that whole mess.
There were probably copies of all those e-mails on all the servers it passed through and anybody who received them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.