I wonder if this news will trigger a run on Labcorp stock.
Any opinions?
Bkmk
the inventor, rest his soul, would likely not be thrilled his invention being used like this, but it may be partly why he isn’t still with us.
Is fake fraudulent a double negative?
Related:
Egg 🥚 prices are not by accident:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4300121/posts
And not specifically related to bird flu, but a most excellent interview with a cancer doctor/researcher/billionaire by Tucker Carlson regarding cancer, Tcell immunization, Covid, the Covid “vax” and the deep state:
https://youtu.be/mgZaT-OriO8?si=PVxh9n80TJFe5BZJ
Is fake fraudulent a double negative?
It is quite peculiar bird flu and COVID respects borders now. No bird flu in Mexico and 70% of Worldwide COVID deaths are in the USA this year.
Please help me out here. What part of your post (and of Mr. Seruga’s) indicates the lab tests are fake? What did I miss?
Bookmark
Bingo!
Is the fraudulence fake? Is the Bird Flu fraudulent, or is it the tests? Terrible headline. I apologize for griping about grammar on a serious thread, but.... It’s so sad what has become of our language now that everyone who can type and click can also publish.
p
IBTFR$$ ... FR $hot $hills ...
“PCR is not a diagnostic test, it is a DNA amplification PROCESS. Nothing more.”
Not true. PCR is used as a diagnostic tool because it can detect the presence of DNA specific to a pathogen, therefore if the DNA is present the pathogen (target DNA) is present. That is about as simple as I can explain it. You can also tell how much of the target DNA is present by how many copy cycles it takes to give a detectable signal. If it takes a large number of cycles there was very little of the pathogen. If it only takes a few there a lot of the infectious organism is present. Back when I started doing PCR it was easy to get false positive results, these days it is much easier because there are computer programs to help identify the right primers/temperatures/cycle times etc.