Replies

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Labcorp has ramped up FAKE fraudulent Bird Flu tests in the U.S. | the PCR process is not a diagnostic test, but is used to create pandemics on demand. , Apparatchik wrote:
Please help me out here. What part of your post (and of Mr. Seruga’s) indicates the lab tests are fake? What did I miss?
It's background information to which Sergua is referring. The inventor of the PCR assay said that it could not diagnose any disease. Kary Mullis (inventor) said it was a laboratory tool used to basically find a needle in a haystack (not his words - he said find minute amounts of material in a sample that would otherwise be missed).
So the CDC and World Health Organization picked up a laboratory tool and misused it as a diagnostic tool. Finding a miniscule amount of something doesn't mean the person ever became ill with the disease in question.
Further, the CDC did not design the PCR to identify the Covid19 virus because, according to the CDC, isolated samples of the Covid 19 virus were 'not available.' So according to the CDC's documentation, the PCR was based on (sought to identify) a 'related coronavirus'. However, the CDC had already told the public that the Covid 19 virus was unlike any virus our bodies had been exposed to before.
Then, the PCR assay has limits because if subjected to too many cycles (centrifuge) the samples in question just break down to building blocks of genetic material. There's a clip of Anthony Fauci saying dismissively, "Well, anything over 25 cycles" would just result in building blocks of material, nothing that could be identifiable.
This invalid PCR 'test', based on its design, would have a very high error rate. But the fact that it was identifying (supposedly) a 'related Corona Virus' meant that it had a 100% false positive rate.
Unfortunately, the people who developed the Covid 'vaccine' used the PCR 'test' to prove the 'vaccine' was working. It's all a mess. It has to mean that the 'vaccines' were not valid and the fact that they don't prevent illness would indicate that.
So when Seruga heard that there's a bird flu 'vax' he posted about the fact that its fake.
I do recall reading and watching pieces showing that school kids tested the PCR on orange juice and it was 'positive' for Covid. There were videos online showing how to fake out a Covid test so you could stay home from work.
But early in the Plandemic, the President of Zimbabwe had his scientists try the Covid 'test' on Kiwi, goats, motor oil etc. and the results showed that the PCR was not reliable.
But, during the pandemic, this unreliable lab assay being used as a diagnostic 'test' determind whether you were detained in a hospital for being contagious, whether you were denied treatment for your respiratory disease, whether you were given organ killing Remdesivir, whether you are locked down in your home or prevented from travel etc.

I got sidetracked in my response here:

"Then, the PCR assay has limits because if subjected to too many cycles (centrifuge) the samples in question just break down to building blocks of genetic material. There's a clip of Anthony Fauci saying dismissively, "Well, anything over 25 cycles" would just result in building blocks of material, nothing that could be identifiable."

The 'building blocks' are called nucleotides. Genetic material like RNA is made up of strands of individual nucleotides. If cycled at more than 25 cycles, the PCR breaks genetic material down to the point it can't be identified.

During the Plandemic, the PCR 'test' was run at 40 cycles. They knew that was too high to render valid results. All smoke and mirrors.