Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/27/2025 4:30:35 AM PDT by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MtnClimber

For your consideration.


2 posted on 03/27/2025 4:30:48 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

He left out Jacqueline JFKs wife who may have been tired of her husband banging Marilyn Monroe, and anything else in a skirt except Dylan Mulvaney


3 posted on 03/27/2025 4:54:03 AM PDT by Fai Mao (All Democrats need to go to prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

If there are two or more shooters, and only one shooter is exposed and made out to be the bad guy, then there is a conspiracy.

Oswald could not have fired a second accurate shot in 2.3 seconds with a bolt action rifle. Cycling the bolt action to get a new round into the chamber and then reacquiring the target with a scope on a moving target in 2.3 seconds is impossible. This was proven by FBI testing.

He was a marginal shooter scoring only at the marksman level in the corp. The cops could not find any gunshot residue on him. So it’s questionable if Oswald himself actually fired the weapon. He said he was a patsy. If the cleanup man, Jack Ruby, had not have silenced him, there would have been many more leads to investigate leading to the truth.


4 posted on 03/27/2025 5:01:16 AM PDT by redfreedom (Happiness is shopping at Walmart and not hearing Spanish once!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
If the lone gunmen was the correct & factual reality, then why was the information deemed necessary to trmain a secret for so many decades?

Lies need to be hidden, while the truth needs no reason to be hidden.

The files would have been thrown wide open & available, not withheld for a period of 50 years, and even remained secret beyond that 50 year limit, if the conclusion is the truth. Furthermore, there would be zero reason for redactions 60 years after the fact. What needs to not be revealed?

6 posted on 03/27/2025 5:09:13 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Conjecturing it a conspiracy rather than a lone wolf/lone gunman because there was so much other activity by people and government(s) is very compelling at first. However, I have heard the coverup type activities ascribed particularly to government as rather predictable, even if it wasn’t a conspiracy, because that’s what a lot of people in power do when they don’t want to be blamed for an incident or problem. If they have the ability to cover their mistakes and hide any associations with people surrounding it, they will. Particularly in a case like the assassination of a popular president. Nobody is going to want that pointing back to them, even in any small way.

However, it’s the gestalt of the whole thing that is so mysterious. The stone-walling, covering up, and burying activity seemed so pervasive both vertically and laterally that it seems almost impossible for it to have been this effective for this long. It can’t be explained by everyone just wanting to disassociate themselves from it.


7 posted on 03/27/2025 5:10:38 AM PDT by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Oswald was a low level INTEL asset, recruited from the time of his service with the Marines. He learned Russian and worked out of Azuki AFB in Japan who worked with U2s.

Oswald was no dummy and no Commie. Like many before him from the Korean war onwards he was recruited by the CIA to infiltrate the USSR and pose as a Marxist, Communist in order to be considered legit.
He renounced his US citizenship, made many “scenes” when acting with US/FBI officials.
He moved to Russia. The USSR monitored him for years knowing he was a spy. Once he married and KGB honeypot (Marina) he suddenly had had enough of the USSR.
He was paid to return to the USA. Once in the USA he had “Handlers” that guided and followed him eventually to Dallas.

He never visited Mexico City - it was a double photographed by the CIA.

He and Marina were handled by De Mohrenschildt and Ruth Paine, (both worked for the CIA). Marina was kept busy with a Lesbian relationship with Ruth (who filmed her escapades).
Ruth got Oswald a job in the TSBD.
Oslwald di not shoot officer Tippet or JFK.

He acted out his role as a Commie very well and once apprehended was pretty darn cool, calm and collect until he realized he was being set up.

Then, as time passed he said he was “...just the Patsy”...why?

Once he said that, Ruby was ordered to eliminate him.

Once Ruby opened up about the plot, he too was eliminated.

Conspiracy, yes.


9 posted on 03/27/2025 5:29:12 AM PDT by Netz ( and looking for a way ti IMPROVE mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

I know that I am in the minority on FR, but I believe that Oswald pulled the trigger and that he acted alone.


10 posted on 03/27/2025 5:34:26 AM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Have you read Roger Stone’s book THE MAN WHO KILLED KENNEDY?

Did you know that Gerald Ford and Arlen Specter were instrumental in browbeating, threatening, and then redacting testimony of anyone who contradicted the “one shooter” scenario?

Did you know the Warren Commission Report doesn’t even have an index?

Srednik is of the opinion this guy is one of them.


11 posted on 03/27/2025 5:43:11 AM PDT by Srednik (Polyglot. Overeducated. Redeemed by Christ. Anticommunist from the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

When the perp ends up dead, in police custody, within hours of being arrested…there’s probably more going on than we see.


13 posted on 03/27/2025 5:51:45 AM PDT by TalBlack (Their god is government. Prepare for a religious war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

I believe the CIA / mob is most probable. Jack “Ruby” Rubenstein took out the Patsy to dutifully cover the operation


14 posted on 03/27/2025 5:55:04 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

There is always a conspiracy afoot to kill the various leaders in the world. Including the US. I believe, therefore, there was a conspiracy to kill Kennedy, but I would not be able to go past this and say who. My thoughts? Oswald acted alone. The Russians would not trust Oswald as the KGB would already know who he was and they would not trust him in anything like an assassination conspiracy. Beyond that I have no idea.

Oswald just happened to be in the place of opportunity and for someone whose life was down the toilet, he saw an opportunity and took it.


17 posted on 03/27/2025 6:29:01 AM PDT by mfish13 (Elections have Consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

“Six Seconds in Dallas”, exposes the complete hoax of the lone gunman. Kill shoot came from behind the fence of the grassy knoll. The head jerk indicates as much in the Z film.


24 posted on 03/27/2025 6:51:53 AM PDT by stockpirate (A group of baboons is referred to as a "Congress" of baboons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

1. The physical evidence contradicts and rules out the official narrative, that Oswald shot Kennedy with one bullet from high and to the right of Kennedy. There were at least three shots which came from in front of, and behind, Kennedy.

2. The fact that officials were placed in a position to lie to us about the assassination says that the people who gained power afterward were conspirators in the assassination.


26 posted on 03/27/2025 7:08:27 AM PDT by nagant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

What potential group of conspirators in this circumstance would have had both something that makes sense as the motive for the crime, plus the ability to put together this plot and carry it out?

\/

hmmm

lets see if history has any clues...

Julius Caesar , stabbed to death by political opponants...?

conspiracy FACT

.


27 posted on 03/27/2025 7:13:43 AM PDT by cuz1961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Oswald was a fellow with un-self-disciplined “smarts.” Not allowing himself time, to add experience that “hardens wood" - he quit in frustration, from jobs, as he did not progress as fast as he wished.

He imagined what each path would be, but then soured on what the path proved to be.

Oswald saw pros and cons of communism, and in other political forms; for him, the grass was always greener on some other side.

He lied a lot. He also read a lot. He liked - sometimes - to toy with people whom he figured did not know as much as he believed that he knew.

After the sojourn to Russia, back in the U.S.A. with his wife, Marina, and baby daughter, June, he was always worried about not being able to support them. In the fall of 1963, along came another baby. Prior to that, he had a long history through parts of 1962 and 1963 of beating his wife, Marina.

His impatience finally overwhelmed him, and he decided in 1963, to force his way to a higher station - that of government or public perception of him.

In March of 1963, Oswald had purchased the pistol and the rifle and kept them stored.

Oswald used the rifle, in an attempt to accelerate his importance (gain fame) and assassinate General Edwin Walker in Texas. Oswald barely missed his target in April 1963.

Oswald had tried in the fall of 1963, to gain favor with both the Cuban government and the Russian government, by visiting the Cuban Embassy in Mexico City. He was rejected - the Cubans in particular, did not trust him and refused the necessary visa that was required for travel to Cuba. Oswald returned to the U.S.A.

He visited a Texas government employment agency and read the newspapers to find work.

On Monday [October 14, 1963], [a friend] Mrs. Paine mentioned the Oswalds' financial and employment problems to neighbors whom she was visiting. Mrs. Linnie Mac Randle, who was also present, remarked that she thought that her younger brother, Buell Wesley Frazier, who worked at the Texas School Book Depository, had said that there was a job opening there.

When Marina heard of this, she asked Mrs. Paine to call the Depository to see if there was an opening. Mrs. Paine called Roy S. Truly, superintendent of the Depository, who indicated that he would talk to Oswald if he would apply in person.

When Oswald telephoned the Paine house on Monday evening, Mrs. Paine told him about this possibility.

On the next day [Tuesday, October 15, 1963], Oswald was interviewed by [Roy S.] Truly and hired in a temporary capacity. He began work on Wednesday, October 16. His duties were to fill book orders; his hours were 8 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., for which he received $1.25 an hour.

Source for much of that info:

Appendix 13: Biography of Lee Harvey Oswald
https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/appendix-13.html

48 posted on 03/28/2025 5:35:13 AM PDT by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson