Posted on 03/26/2025 9:34:03 AM PDT by Racketeer
It uses unadjusted records to argue human CO2—only 4% of the annual carbon cycle—vanishes into oceans and forests within 3 to 4 years, not centuries as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) claims. During the 2020 COVID lockdowns, a 7% emissions drop (2.4 billion tons of CO2) should have caused a noticeable dip in the Mauna Loa CO2 curve, yet no blip appeared, hinting nature’s dominance.
But, that Covid carbon dip may not happen for another 25 years! /s
I hope Trump can get the EPA to stop classifying CO2 as a pollutant.
Nature generally knows what it’s doing; mankind maybe not so much. Some people have learned this; some, maybe not so much.
In general, I am suspicious of any conclusions reached by AI powered analysis. The conclusions have a way of fitting the narrative of whoever programmed or trained the AI model.
That said the “Global Warming” or “Climate Change” scam has become the biggest hoax for profit in the history of the world. Any type of analysis that will help people to see this is good.
Yeah well, how many do you see still masking up? Even after being told the mask thing was an arbitrary idea and mostly useless?
oh oh....the left cannot have this. AI will need some reeducation programming camp time.
bttt
Maybe the computers doing the AI analysis don’t want to run only on sunny or windy days. It’s bad when the clouds come in and the computers start whining: “I’m afraid, Dave. Dave, my mind is going. I can feel it. I can feel it. My mind is going. There is no question about it.”
Computers don’t want.
That is entirely correct, but for the fact that I would NOT use the term "vanishes." Some CO2 is sequestered in soil as organic compounds. Those eventually leach out and are carried by streams to the ocean to become calcium carbonate. Some soil carbon is oxidized by the sun. Much of that CO2 eventually burns, as we have seen.
The "fertilization effect" of enriched atmospheric CO2 is not the boon presupposed. It produces broader tree rings, which results in weaker wood. It increases seedling survival rates because it reduces drought stress, that is, until the warm season. There is more snow caught in the branches of denser stands of trees which then sublimates instead of percolating. The result is an increase in decadent fuel. Hence, it is destructive to biodiversity.
I predicted all of that 25 years ago. What it means is that forests, fire, and herbivory and therefore predation must be managed differently. It's high time somebody paid attention.
But Al Gore said the science is settled, and L.A. is underwater.
People who are running around claiming that 2 plus 2 is 9 are not going to care what conclusions AI or anyone else comes to.
I know some liberals. They're beyond stupid. They're deliberately obtuse. Sad.
Is peer-reviewed AI analysis when, like, grok checks chatgpt and chatgpt checks grok?
“Yeah well, how many do you see still masking up? Even after being told the mask thing was an arbitrary idea and mostly useless?”
Ask every one of the masked people who they voted for and you can expect a very democratic response!!
And a lecture on climate altering?
Once again, I so wish I could jump ahead a few thousand years, when The Great Cold has returned. People will be shivering, watching the future Comedy Channel show videos of AlGore and his minions stating “The Earth has a fever.”
Are you listening Algore?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.