If the Supreme Court decides that some little judge in some little district can basically pass a federal law for the entire nation by simply waving his little gavel, then I say we’re in brand new territory.
BTTT
Roberts is hiding under his bed.
L
Comply. Rehire them.
Start with them sending in a resume’. Then reassign everyone in the hiring department and shut down the hiring department.
EC
Maybe Trump should Stack The Supreme Court ,LOL
“Asks”? What about tells.
Many of these people were hired by Biden to infiltrate and obstruct the Trump administration. It’s disgusting how so many slow thinking news watchers hearts are bleeding for them. The U.S. Government isn’t a jobs program.
Wake up, SCOTUS! Time to start acting Supreme, and take leadership. Ignore these rhetorical ‘shots across the bow’ at the peril of losing more of your credibility. Your authority
is being openly challenged in courtrooms across the land.
The judge in question needs to have a meeting with one of Bondi’s staff and have the definition of “probationary” explained, along with a lecture on the designation and separation of powers.
Judges are there to follow the law, not make it.
So, what is the meaning of probation? Normally, probational employees can be fired for any reason. So, what’s really going on here?
I read the story, and all the comments to this point in this posting, and I find a glaring omission: the judge did not quote from the US Code (USC) in his findings. Instead, he quoted from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). "Law" not passed by Congress and signed by the President. The CFR codifies the opinion of unelected bureaucrats about the procedures used to administrate what it believes the rules should be.
Now, some of the CFR rules can be traced back to the USC statutes, while others cannot. What a judge is supposed to do is, in a ruling, trace back to USC statutes, or prior Court rulings that also traced back to USC statutes.
I'm not pleased with the quality of lawyering in the current Department of Justice. Bondi and Co missed AOC practicing law without a license, for example, when she conducted a webinar for illegal immigrants on how to evade capture and deportation. (Granted, Bondi was blinded by the cop crying "obstruction!" when in fact AOC didn't obstruct justice, because obstruction requires a physical act.) Frankly, the Democrats did it better.