Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: V_TWIN
Roberts will say the Trump administration has no standing.

When SCOTUS said that in 2020 to the states filing a lawsuit over the 2020 steal, they can say that about anything.
9 posted on 03/25/2025 7:14:10 AM PDT by Dan in Wichita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dan in Wichita

“Roberts will say the Trump administration has no standing.”

General Malta represents both Malta and Epstein Island.
The Elected beloved Trump administration has no standing
at either ... or in the unelected, antiConstitutional
Maltese- and Italian-following SCOTUS.


17 posted on 03/25/2025 7:43:00 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Dan in Wichita

And they said that Donald Trump - the one whose election was potentially stolen - had no standing to sue.

The Obama eligibility lawsuits told us everything - and the fact that the judges’ claims were all different when it was people wanting to get Trump off the ballot.

Obama’s eligibility issue was nobody’s business, because
1, nobody had peculiar harm (as long as we’re all screwed equally it is nobody’s business)

2. no harm was done until the election was certified, and once the election was certified it was too late.

3. the courts say the issue is a political matter (Congress could refuse to certify the electoral vote) but Congress said it was a judicial matter since they are only allowed to count votes)

Between those 3 legal ways to keep anybody from being allowed to petition the government for a redress of grievances, we the people have no means of accountability for our govt - not even through the states, as you note.

Yet we just had a judge in CA say that nobody in the whole fedgov can be fired because the unions say that if they were, that MIGHT make their job harder. Where is the need to show that harm has actually happened? Where is the need to show that you have suffered an injury peculiar to you and not one everybody suffers? Where is the need to say that this is a matter for the judiciary rather than through administration?

All of the judicial garbage they’ve been using on we the people is thrown out the window when it’s their pet group coming to them.

How can this be “equal protection” and “due process”? The whole thing is a sick, sick joke.


21 posted on 03/25/2025 7:57:07 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson