Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

David Ferrie: Unraveling the Oddball Linked to the JFK Assassination
YouTube ^ | March 2024 | Davidbirdman101

Posted on 03/22/2025 3:28:53 PM PDT by Steely Tom

This is a comment that is on the YouTube video given in the link.

I worked for an emergency door repair service in the year 2000, I got a call to go fix a garage door in a suburb of Memphis Tn.

The man who opened the door was a very fit, silver haired guy who looked like a retired executive. He showed me the garage door and stoof by while I repaired it.

I stared making small talk while I work. I asked him what kind of work he did and he told me he was a retired FBI agent. Not only that, he said he was over the entire southeastern division of the FBI.

So I decided to make a joke and I asked him since he was a FBI agent, maybe he could tell me who killed Kennedy.

He looked at me and without missing a beat said, Lyndon Johnson and J. Edgar Hoover had him killed.

I was speechless. I thought, this guy is nuts.

Well I didn't say a whole lot more until I went in his study so he could write me a check. I looked around and his walls were covered with diplomas and pictures of the guy at the FBI academy and with politicians, Lamar Alexander was one.

I said, look I just have to ask you something. He stopped me and said, you don't believe it,do you?

He knew what I was going to say.

He said, do you have time for a cup of coffee? I said, I'll make time. We went into kitchen and he made me a cup of sanka instant coffee and proceeded to tell me the whole story. It took about 30-40 minutes. After I left, I went home and told my wife and forgot about it for 18 years.

Then I saw a thing on YouTube and there was a writer selling a book about Johnson, Hoover and Kennedy.

The guy said exactly what the FBI guy said to me 18 years before. The guy who wrote the book was Roger Stone.

I was totally blown away.

Now, I know some people will say, why would a retired FBI agent tell me, a nobody, these things?

That's a good question, I don't know why he did.

Maybe he felt like getting it off of his chest.

But what I'm saying is the truth.

He went into some details that I don't feel like writing about. That day I lost all confidence in our government.



TOPICS: Conspiracy; History; Society; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: 19631122; carlosmarcello; davidferrie; dealeyplaza; fbi; jfk; kennedy; lowlevelmobster; mafiahit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last
To: Steely Tom
A couple of BS red flags in this:

But what I'm saying is the truth.

He went into some details that I don't feel like writing about.

41 posted on 03/22/2025 5:20:51 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

I agree. I’m kind of wishing I didn’t post the story. It’s not that credible.


42 posted on 03/22/2025 5:21:37 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
Thanks but we have our opinions and they clearly differ. I'm not going to read through 80K pages of newly released documents, nor am I going to believe any "tell all" book published by a major publisher since there is zero chance any of them would publish a book that showed negatively on Moscow.

If it wasn't Oswald from the Book Depository, where did the bullets that struck JFK and John Connally come from?

There is no credible theory other than the shooter firing from an elevated position to the rear of the limo.

If the bullet was fired from the front at roughly ground level, why didn't the windshield shatter and why wasn't the trailing vehicle and police motorcycles just a few feet behind not also struck? Even if the shooter was directly ahead in an elevated position, where could he have fired from in order to hit both Connally and JFK without breaking the windshield, or putting a hole in the backseat/trunk, or hitting the trailing vehicle or motorcycles?

If the bullets were fired from the rear at near ground level, from where? A trailing vehicle with two police motorcycles to either side were just a few feet behind the presidential limo blocking line-of-sight from the rear.

Where could the shooter have been in order to hit Connally and JFK but no one else inside the limo? There were six people inside the limo. Only two were hit, JFK and Connally sitting directly ahead of him. Why didn't the windshield shatter? Why isn't bullet damage to the limo consistent with any of the frontal or side attack theories?

If the bullets were fired from the right side on the Grassy Knoll, why wasn't Jackie, Connelly's wife, or the driver also struck, or at least covered in splatter?

If the bullets were fired from the right side from the top of the Grassy Knoll, from where could the shooter have been to hit Connally and JFK but not hit anyone sitting on the left side, or strike the vehicle on the left side? Furthermore, if the shooter was from anywhere to the right or left, how can the back-chest gunshot wound to Connally sitting directly ahead of JFK be explained?

If the bullets were fired from the left, where would the shooter(s) have to be to avoid missing Jackie, Connally's wife and the driver?

If the bullets were fired from either side, why doesn't the Zapruder film show his head jerking violently sideways? Furthermore, if JFK was shot from the front, why does the Zapruder film show the pink mist ahead of JFK rather than behind?

If the shooter was anywhere other than in an elevated position to the rear, how can bullet damage to the limo be explained?

The best explanation is that the shooter fired from an elevated position to the rear of the presidential limo.

43 posted on 03/22/2025 5:24:17 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fso301

I have no opinion on where the bullets came from—I have no ballistics expertise.

What I do know is that the Warren Commission cannot be trusted.

Their failure to identify Oswald as a CIA agent undermines their entire narrative so I have no choice but to dismiss the entire report as untrustworthy.


44 posted on 03/22/2025 5:28:06 PM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
I’m kind of wishing I didn’t post the story.

No need to worry about that. There are all kinds of stories out there, somewhere one is close to the truth.

45 posted on 03/22/2025 5:31:28 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: fso301
Frame 313 of Zapruder film:

Jackie's pink hat and left sleeve of her matching pink jacket are directly behind JFK's head. Piece of skull shooting almost straight up from his forehead.

Explosive bullet fired through front windshield.

Bullet hole in front windshield observed by several people who were gathered outside the Parkland Hospital Emergency Room entrance, immediately after JFK was taken out of the limo and wheeled into ER #1.

46 posted on 03/22/2025 5:32:47 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: OldHarbor
So, the Warren Commission report, what’s your take on that ? Gospel or Fairy Tale ?

It's been a while since I read it but I always sensed it wasn't completely forthcoming since at the height of the Cold War, for there to have been a strong possibility that a sitting president was assassinated on orders from Moscow, possibly via Havana would have been a casus belli.

See my post #43 a little farther down in this thread concerning the shooter's location.

47 posted on 03/22/2025 5:34:44 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
As to the the Walker assassination, it’s strange, and I can’t explain it. I just don’t know what it means, other than that Oswald was a hard-core communist. Maybe he was.

See also my post #43 a little farther down concerning where JFK's assassin could have fired from.

48 posted on 03/22/2025 5:37:09 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: fso301

You may or may not know this—but it was LBJ who told Chief Justice Warren that is was necessary to crush any claims of conspiracy for exactly the reason you stated.

Hint: LBJ was lying. He knew it had nothing to do with Communists or Russia or Cuba.

He was scamming Warren.


49 posted on 03/22/2025 5:37:58 PM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: fso301

That’s the argument that LBJ used to induce Earl Warren to lead the investigative effort. He didn’t want to have anything to do with it, but LBJ gave him “the treatment,” for which he was so famous.


50 posted on 03/22/2025 5:38:20 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Lol—we were there within a few seconds of each other.


51 posted on 03/22/2025 5:39:04 PM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Noticed that!


52 posted on 03/22/2025 5:40:04 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Funny story—when I was in my teens (late 60s) I called into a talk show about this topic.

I was convinced of the LBJ phony baloney (Russians, Cuba, Commies) and told that to the radio show host.

He cleaned my clock in a hurry—and that taught me I had a lot of homework to do on this topic.

Now more than fifty books and fifty years later....

Lol.


53 posted on 03/22/2025 5:45:20 PM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

So the talk show host was a Warren Report skeptic?

Wow. Didn’t know there was much skepticism around in the late 60s.

Zapruder film was first shown to the public February 14th, 1969, according to Google.

I know Mark Rudd was doing everything he could to undermine the Warren Report well before that time. I always wondered how successful he had been in his efforts.


54 posted on 03/22/2025 5:49:10 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

That’s right. Bannister. What a freaky character.

Interesting movie, no matter how accurate it was or wasn’t.


55 posted on 03/22/2025 5:50:17 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (It's hard not to celebrate the fall of bad people. - Bongino)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
Sorry, I meant Mark Lane, not Mark Rudd. Should have checked before I hit "Post."
56 posted on 03/22/2025 5:50:49 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
Frame 313 of Zapruder film:

Unfortunately, your image didn't show.

Explosive bullet fired through front windshield. Bullet hole in front windshield observed by several people who were gathered outside the Parkland Hospital Emergency Room entrance, immediately after JFK was taken out of the limo and wheeled into ER #1.

Explosive bullet fired from front would have exploded on contact with the windshield.

Here is a technology enhanced version of the Zapruder film.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubW7KB4E--4

The video shows that JFK was first struck in the upper spine/neck area which is why he exhibits a Thorburn’s Reflex (involuntarily grabbing the throat with both hands) moments before a follow-up shot strikes his head. The pink mist caused by the follow-up is ahead of JFK and the windshield of the limo remains intact.

57 posted on 03/22/2025 5:57:42 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

There was a lot of “street talk” doubting the Warren Commission in the 1960s—coming mostly from the left at that time—and of course the Garrison investigation was also getting a lot of coverage.


58 posted on 03/22/2025 5:57:53 PM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
You may or may not know this—but it was LBJ who told Chief Justice Warren that is was necessary to crush any claims of conspiracy for exactly the reason you stated.

Do you have a primary source for that? Where can I go to read that myself

59 posted on 03/22/2025 5:59:01 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: fso301
Do you have a primary source for that? Where can I go to read that myself

It's on tape. LBJ had everything taped.

The tape system was there before Nixon took office.

60 posted on 03/22/2025 6:00:21 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson