As Mark Levin has stated repeatedly this week, the way to deal with Boasberg is for Congress to simply eliminate his court. It is within The House’s power to do so and it would be a great lesson to all the other black-robed petty tyrants.
This guy is also the president of a group that is very likely hosting ex parte collusion between judges, justices, DOJ, prosecutors like Alvin Bragg, Trish James, Fani Lewis, etc, lawyer lawmakers, etc that have put together the legal hamstringing of Trump in his first term and what we’re seeing on steroids right now. Check my latest comments to see more on that.
Boasberg nominated Judge Beryl Howell for an award because of her J6 work - you know, the prosecutions that were smacked down by SCOTUS for using unconstitutional charges and enhanced sentencing.
The ethical guidelines are that a judge must recuse if he/she has a relative up to the third degree who may stand to gain financially from his/her decisions. This guy’s sister, wife, and daughter all stand to gain from his decisions. That’s 3 first-degree relatives.
This guy should absolutely be disbarred and the DC District Court should be disbanded by Congress.
Daughter, wife and twin sisters! All judge relatives that profit from illegal immigration.
I fixed your post. Hope you don't mind.
Personal political opinions and outright bias have no place in the halls (or is it hauls?) of justice, but it has been a strong determining factor of the nominations of various candidates to Federal judiciary positions under the Obama and Biden regimes.
Congress should simply shut down the various District Federal courts when these conflicting rulings come up, and reconstitute them later, with a new set of judicial nominees, and let everything fall back on the Supreme Court.
They think they have a crowded calendar now, just wait.
Quotes from the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees:
Article 31. - Refugees unlawfully in the country of refuge
1. The Contracting States shall not impose penalties, on account of their illegal entry or presence, on refugees who, coming directly from a territory where their life or freedom was threatened in the sense of article 1, enter or are present in their territory without authorization, provided they present themselves without delay to the authorities and show good cause for their illegal entry or presence.
2. The Contracting States shall not apply to the movements of such refugees restrictions other than those which are necessary and such restrictions shall only be applied until their status in the country is regularized or they obtain admission into another country. The Contracting States shall allow such refugees a reasonable period and all the necessary facilities to obtain admission into another country.
Article 32. - Expulsion
1. The Contracting States shall not expel a refugee lawfully in their territory save on grounds of national security or public order.
2. The expulsion of such a refugee shall be only in pursuance of a decision reached in accordance with due process of law. Except where compelling reasons of national security otherwise require, the refugee shall be allowed to submit evidence to clear himself, and to appeal to and be represented for the purpose before competent authority or a person or persons specially designated by the competent authority.
3. The Contracting States shall allow such a refugee a reasonable period within which to seek legal admission into another country. The Contracting States reserve the right to apply during that period such internal measures as they may deem necessary.
Article 23 - Public relief
The Contracting States shall accord to refugees lawfully staying in their territory the same treatment with respect to public relief and assistance as is accorded to their nationals.
Article 17 - Wage-earning employment
....
2. In any case, restrictive measures imposed on aliens or the employment of aliens for the protection of the national labour market shall not be applied to a refugee...who fulfils one of the following conditions:
(a) He has completed three years’ residence in the country;
....
(c) He has one or more children possessing the nationality of the country of residence.
Article 34 - Naturalization [and getting the right to vote (and buy AR-15s)]
The Contracting States shall as far as possible facilitate the assimilation and naturalization of refugees. They shall in particular make every effort to expedite naturalization proceedings and to reduce as far as possible the charges and costs of such proceedings.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-relating-status-refugees
Article 44 - Denunciation [getting out from under the Refugee Convention]
1. Any Contracting State may denounce this Convention at any time by a notification addressed to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
2. Such denunciation shall take effect for the Contracting State concerned one year from the date upon which it is received by the Secretary-General of the United Nations....
****
What does Trump have to do to get the US out from under the Refugee Convention?
Send (or hand deliver) the Secretary-General of the United Nations Antonio Guterres a letter!
****
Dear Secretary-General of the United Nations:
I, Donald J. Trump, the President of the United States, on behalf of the United States, do denounce the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol, as permitted by Article 44.
Donald J. Trump
The Refugee Convention, the invaders’ red carpet, must be removed from the Democratic Party toolbox by invoking Article 44.
****
“Building a wall is a red herring”
“The fundamental problem is that anyone can claim asylum with zero proof, which means all of Earth can come to America.”
Elon Musk
TOTALITARIANS. Skull & Bones: EVIL collective. Boa$berg. America’s robed mullah is EVIL. Deceptive. Deeds-Words-Face.
He stopped trumps taxes from being released and made hillary release her emails. He’s all over the place politically.
Perhaps find some of the worst illegals and simply release them in his courtroom and let him figure out what to do.
“According to the U.S. Judges’ Code of Conduct, judges should recuse themselves if a close relative might benefit from their decisions....”
Not surprising that Democrat-controlled media hides this. What puzzles me is why Trump’s DoJ is not making big issue of it in an emergency appeal to SCOTUS. Is this because Roberts oversees Boasberg’s circuit and DoJ thinks Roberts would derail the appeal? I’d rather put Roberts on the spot — he publicly stated that appeals were the way to contest decisions we don’t agree with — not calling for impeachment first. Perhaps Roberts WANTS to deal with the Boasberg problem and needs the ball teed up correctly. (Wishful thinking on my part).
"According to the U.S. Judges’ Code of Conduct, judges should recuse themselves if a close relative might benefit from their decisions. Yet here we are, with a judge whose rulings are practically aligned with his daughter’s paycheck."
According to the US Judges’ official “Code of Conduct,” judges should recuse themselves if a close relative might benefit from their decisions. To thwart President Trump, Judge Boasberg orders the return of planes carrying MS13 and Tren De Aragua violent gang members.
Are the judge’s rulings aligned with his daughter’s paycheck?
<><>his daughter works for Partners for Justice,
<><>Partners for Justice gets 76% of their cash flow from US tax dollars
<><>Partners for Justice aids the airborne criminals anti-deportation activities.