Posted on 03/19/2025 10:12:54 AM PDT by hardspunned
• This declassified CIA cable from 1996 provides compelling evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald was, in fact, a CIA asset, according to his Commander at the time.
• The cable’s very existence—marked “SECRET” and addressing a specific media inquiry about Oswald’s CIA ties in Japan—reveals an agency on high alert, carefully managing a narrative that threatens to expose a long-buried secret: Oswald’s recruitment
• Consider the context… Oswald was stationed at Atsugi, a known CIA hub for covert operations, including U-2 spy plane missions, from 1957 to 1958.
• The cable confirms that as late as 1996, a credible UPI reporter was pursuing a story that Oswald was recruited by the CIA during this period, per Oswald’s commanding officer.
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
The Warren Commission said Oswald did not work for the CIA.
So—they have been caught in kinda a big lie.
“The notion that the marine Oswald learned Russian without government supervision/training was a joke from day one.”
Why? Plenty of people learn Russian on their own.
He worked for the CIA—that is a hard fact at this point.
That means he was being trained by the CIA to learn Russian to spy on the Russians.
Then—surprise, surprise—he went to Russia as ordered by the CIA.
Again, you have no evidence of that, and it is evidence of nothing anyway.
NEXT!
This thread is evidence Oswald worked for the CIA.
If you are not convinced of that then there is nothing further to discuss.
Seems likely.
I think the main question is whether the FBI had recruited him.
Everyone already knew or believed that and/or consider it irrelevant to the crime.
Keep chasing your own tale and get back to me in a year or two.
Wrong—the “conspiracy theory debunkers” from the Warren Commission to several authors who defended the Warren Commission (and all mass media) insisted that Oswald did not work for the CIA.
They claimed it was a crazy conspiracy theory.
It is now a conspiracy fact.
Oswald spoke Russian so well, that his wife , who did not know he was an American when she met him the first time, thought that Oswald was a from a Baltic state .
No matter
Oswald is still in that 6th story window of the TSBD as Kennedy passes by underneath and all 3 shots have been evidenced to have come from that window with an almost absolute certainty AND beyond almost ANY doubt. He was seen in that window at that time.
Nothing else really matters.
Here is one example of a Washington Post article in 2017 arguing that Oswald did not work for the CIA:
“MR. HELMS: Mr. Belin, this question, and I think you may recall this, was raised at the time and the Agency was never able to find any evidence whatsoever, and we really searched that it had any contact with Lee Harvey Oswald. As far as the FBI was concerned, my recollection is not all that precise. I believe that Mr. Hoover testified that he had not been an agent of theirs either. He was certainly not an agent of the CIA. He was certainly never used by the CIA.”
Former CIA Director Helms told the Warren Commission that Oswald did not work for the CIA.
Helms lied—and the Washington Post believed the Helms lie.
Once the Warren Commission gets caught in a really important lie a reasonable person might want to question every single word in their report.
Ok, let’s make this easy.
1. I concede every point you make about Oswald and the CIA.
2. This has nothing to do with a garden variety politically driven narcissist with delusions of grandeur to INDEPENDENTLY decide that fate has given him his great opportunity to change the entire world by murdering the leader of the free world who will just be happening to pass by his work window one day...AND, with the same rifle he used 6 months earlier to almost kill a federal judge in the city of Dallas.
THAT is the most obvious, simplest explanation. ALL the evidence ends up pointing directly at Oswald, in that 6th floor window, with that rifle, on that day, 11/22/63.
I will accept that #1 and #2 are both true. Fine. BUT... #2 is a million times truer, and more relevant, than #1.
Oswald came up with the whole assassination on his own, just like he came up with trying to assassinate that federal judge, on his own.
You are chasing your tale, and that never ends.
It’s called “chasing your own tale”.
As I am just finding out.
Wow.
That was kind of unusual in the early 1960’s... at the peak of the Russia/USA hostilities. Most of those who self-learned Russian were still quite sympathetic in Russian/Soviet/Communist ideology.
As it was, the FBI and Warren Commission had too many gun shots, wounds, and bullets to account for if Oswald was the lone assassin. To overcome this problem, the Zapruder film, the autopsy, the autopsy photos, and witness testimony were tampered with to fit the Oswald as lone gunman theory.
The problem is that once the Warren Commission is discredited on one major point it must be ignored as a source for any other points.
You don’t get to lie twice.
Looking at the autopsy photos it dawned on me.
The rumors of these photos actually being of tippet can be confirmed.
The hair is too short.
In the motorcade, Kennedy’s hair was long in the front. The autopsy photos show much shorter hair.
The tippet switch theory has evidence.
They couldn’t change grow tippet’s hair after he was killed!
I lie a lot, especially to women, but sometimes I tell the truth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.