Friggin’ Hawaiian lawyers and judges. Where the hell are they going to law school? Honolulu Middle School?
Seems to me, the builder should have done survey before they built. They didnt, now all that money is forfeit because they failed to do due diligence. Seems like the builder is trying to pull some sort adverse possession on a greatly accelerated scale.
denolition needed?
contact the expert, kim jung un! he has an office in pyongyang. he can do the job remotely. very thorough demolition capability! save big money!
Surveyor’s often get it wrong too, by identifying the wrong lot. One of the biggest risks in the surveying world.
Mrs. Reynolds should simply move into the house. Squatters seem to have more rights than anyone.
Let’s see how that would play out in ultra liberal Hawaii !
If the owner is amenable, let them keep it.
Yes, the mistake needs to be corrected, but what a waste.
Out of control judges. No need anymore for town council, mayors or supervisors.
Can you imagine buying the premiere corner lot at a new development, and then some other person decides to build on your preferred lot so they can claim "property rights" of the home that was illegally built in order to steal your prime location from you?
-PJ
Is this the case where a Hawaiian woman checked on her empty lot, only to find a new home was built on it?
The builder who messed up and built on her lot then proposed a lot swap, which she refused.
Is this that same case or is this something else?