To: All
This is why I demand my CT scanner is a genuine Chinese made one.
2 posted on
03/11/2025 3:23:30 PM PDT by
BipolarBob
(Whoever said "out of sight, out of mind" never had a snake disappear in their bedroom.)
To: nickcarraway
As an old Nuke that’s been a big peeve of mine forever. I’ve yet to find a medical person who can say what the radiation exposure to any particular test might be. That’s why they get behind a lead wall when they are zapping us.
And that’s why they banned fluoroscopes. The operators couldn’t shield themselves.
To: nickcarraway
“That will lead to cancer in a small percentage of patients, approximately 36,000 cancers every year.”
…I disagree that’s a “small percentage”
4 posted on
03/11/2025 3:24:49 PM PDT by
albie
(U)
To: nickcarraway
Translation: Insurance companies think they are paying too much out for CT scans and probably MRIs too.
5 posted on
03/11/2025 3:25:28 PM PDT by
DesertRhino
(2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2025... RETURN OF THE JEDI...)
To: nickcarraway
This is not new information. Maybe they have more data now but it has always been known that CT-scans are radiation scans, and too many CT scans, especially over a short period of time, is risky.
6 posted on
03/11/2025 3:28:11 PM PDT by
monkeyshine
(live and let live is dead)
To: nickcarraway
That will lead to cancer in a small percentage of patientSo will flying on an airplane.
As a diagnostic tool, CAT scanning is more valuable to a patient than a risk. Sure, reduce the dosage to what is necessary but let's not get our panties in a bunch over this.
7 posted on
03/11/2025 3:28:43 PM PDT by
pfflier
To: nickcarraway
About fifteen years ago, after the removal of most of a benign pituitary tumor, I declined a recommended course of stereotactic “gamma knife” radiation for the residue. As I learned by reading the medical literature through a second opinion, the software, operator training, and control over the radiation dosing were all problematic.
To: nickcarraway
Mankind survived and thrived for tens of thousands of years without any of these procedures.
10 posted on
03/11/2025 3:33:12 PM PDT by
exnavy
(See article IV section 4 of our constitution.)
To: nickcarraway
13 posted on
03/11/2025 3:36:32 PM PDT by
TTFX
To: nickcarraway
...but glowing in the dark can have it’s advantages.
15 posted on
03/11/2025 3:37:59 PM PDT by
RckyRaCoCo
(Time to throw them out of the Temple...again)
To: nickcarraway
Just for grins, I took my own geiger counter to my last CT just to find out for myself. I clocked over 40,000 CPM (Counts per Minute) an hour after the test, and was still registering a 1000 the next day. However, I am fighting liver cancer, so I am checked by CT at least twice per year. I have at least 4 MRIs per year, but they don’t use radiation so are not as hazardous. I was amazed that when I asked the technicians about this, they were clueless. The best they could offer was that their management made them wear radiation badges, which were checked regularly.
To: nickcarraway
That's why Lois Lane died of cancer.
39 posted on
03/11/2025 4:29:25 PM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
( O give thanks unto the Lord, for He is gracious, and His mercy endureth forever. — Psalm 106)
To: nickcarraway
I have lost count of how many CT scans, MRI’s, PET scans, x-rays, and a few others that i’ve had- Some years there were several- some fairly close together-
45 posted on
03/11/2025 5:27:06 PM PDT by
Bob434
(...Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana)
To: nickcarraway
Do they still do scans at airports? It’s been a long time since I last flew. I chose a pat-down instead of a scan last time. They were polite enough. No overt eyerolls, though you do have to repeat yourself to be understood.
46 posted on
03/11/2025 5:46:18 PM PDT by
ChessExpert
(The Democratic party must be destroyed.)
To: rlmorel; nikos1121
48 posted on
03/11/2025 6:59:09 PM PDT by
Albion Wilde
(“Did you ever meet a woke person that’s happy? There’s no such thing.” —Donald J. Trump)
To: nickcarraway
Is it the CT technology, or is it that DEI scan operators are causing a noticeable uptick?
49 posted on
03/11/2025 7:01:27 PM PDT by
Albion Wilde
(“Did you ever meet a woke person that’s happy? There’s no such thing.” —Donald J. Trump)
To: nickcarraway
Last year I had lots of CT scans. I also had multiple trips to interventional radiology to place drains in my abdomen and to embolize a bleeding renal artery. Placement of the NJ tube was also done with a fluoroscope. Lots of radiation and contrast. There is no way to know if the 3000 RADs through my gut in 1985 for the first cancer set the stage for last year's festivities. The literature says that the 5 year prognosis for ampullary cancer has a median death at 36 months after a successful Whipple procedure with a range of 32% to 67%. Examining the stage and histology reports puts me in the 32% range. All the CT scans were necessary at the time to assess pneumonia and an aortic aneurysm. The pneumonia is resolved. The aneurysm is too high risk to attempt.
50 posted on
03/11/2025 8:19:25 PM PDT by
Myrddin
To: nickcarraway
“Many patients still routinely receive radiation doses two or three times what they should,” said Dr. Rebecca Smith-Bindman, a professor at the University of California-San Francisco medical school.What could go wrong?

Regards,
51 posted on
03/11/2025 9:04:49 PM PDT by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: nickcarraway
52 posted on
03/11/2025 9:17:26 PM PDT by
BiteYourSelf
( Earth first, we'll strip mine the other planets later.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson