Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jasmine Crockett insists 'it's not a crime' to illegally cross the border
Fox News ^ | 3/09/25 | Lindsay Kornic

Posted on 03/09/2025 11:58:48 PM PDT by Libloather

Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, said on Saturday that illegally entering the country was "not a crime" despite being in violation of federal law.

On MSNBC’s "The Katie Phang Show," the Texas Democrat discussed her recent performance at a House committee hearing on sanctuary city policies last week. She used the time to explain to the audience that illegally entering the country was not a "crime" but a "civil accusation," meaning illegal immigrants are not criminals.

"[Republicans] are so outraged by these immigrants and the crime that they’re bringing. And not to mention, city law enforcement, local law enforcement, they are always going after crime," Crockett said. "And they don’t say, ‘oh, you committed a murder, oh, but you’re an immigrant. Well, let me let you go.’ Right? So they are always focused on crime."

She added, "They continue to say things like ‘the illegals’ and that they broke the law coming in. But what they’re not telling the American people is that it is a civil violation. It is not a criminal violation to enter the country illegally. It’s not. It’s not criminal. It’s not a crime. It’s not a crime. Which is why they’re so frustrated, because they really want our local law enforcement to go out and round up people when they could be looking out for the murderers and the sexual abusers, as well as the robbers. They want them to go and round people up on civil accusations."

Improper entry into the United States is considered a federal misdemeanor crime in violation of 8 USC 1325, punishable by fines and up to six months in jail for first-time offenders. Repeat offenders can be subjected to fines and up to two years in prison.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; History; Local News
KEYWORDS: border; crime; crockett; ghettopotamus; illegal; numb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: Libloather

Jasmine is a ratchet.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1325


41 posted on 03/10/2025 5:29:01 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laconic
She got 85 percent of the vote in her district last November.

That's 85% of the votes, not 85% of the public in her district. In most of these Democrat sewers, voters don't bother to vote because it's so corrupt.

Until we have "none of the above" on each and every ballot, we'll continue to have selections, not elections.

42 posted on 03/10/2025 5:45:11 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

<< “[Republicans] are so outraged by these immigrants and the crime that they’re bringing. And not to mention, city law enforcement, local law enforcement, they are always going after crime,” Crockett said. “And they don’t say, ‘oh, you committed a murder, oh, but you’re an immigrant. Well, let me let you go.’ Right? So they are always focused on crime.” >>

Crockett makes AOC sound like a genius by comparison.


43 posted on 03/10/2025 5:49:25 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

If illegals trended Republican, that hood rat would be singing a different tune.


44 posted on 03/10/2025 6:07:59 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

It should be a crime to be that stupid and retain a leadership role, elected or otherwise.


45 posted on 03/10/2025 6:21:20 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

This bitch puts on the “Hood” act to pander to ignorant democrat voters, she came from a well off family, is highly educated and more than capable of speaking proper english. So in other words, she’s a democrat turd.


46 posted on 03/10/2025 6:23:54 AM PDT by Mastador1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

There needs to be a deep dive into how someone so ignorant of the law could have graduated with a JD and passed the bar.


47 posted on 03/10/2025 6:25:38 AM PDT by liberalh8ter ( This tagline has taken the month off to attend the inauguration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Omnivore-Dan

Obviously.


48 posted on 03/10/2025 6:48:40 AM PDT by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Jasmine’s an idiot as are the people who put this idiot into office. Jasmine probably listened to that other idiot, Hank Johnson, talk about a capsizing Guam and thought, “He’s right! We need to act now!”


49 posted on 03/10/2025 7:04:09 AM PDT by LouAvul (1 John 2:22: He that denies that Jesus is the Christ is a liar and antichrist. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

She gave a brilliant legal analysis—for someone with an IQ below room temperature.


50 posted on 03/10/2025 7:06:34 AM PDT by cgbg (The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

This is what you get when you send someone who’s I.Q. is the same as someone who dropped out of kindergarten to Congress to shoot off her big mouth and declare herself as being the RATS’ new “rising star”.


51 posted on 03/10/2025 7:38:40 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Fight fascist bureaucracy! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Improper entry into the United States is considered a federal misdemeanor crime in violation of 8 USC 1325, punishable by fines and up to six months in jail for first-time offenders. Repeat offenders can be subjected to fines and up to two years in prison.

Should be a federal felony, and/or subject to invasion repulsion.


52 posted on 03/10/2025 11:00:48 AM PDT by ro_dreaming (Who knew "Idiocracy", "1984", "Enemy of the State", and "Person of Interest" would be non-fiction?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Has she even read the laws? They are illegal aliens. Gripes me when they use different names, then act like the rest of us are wrong.


53 posted on 03/10/2025 11:05:02 AM PDT by Tammy8 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oscar in Batangas

assuming Kamala, Gavin, and a couple dozen other ‘personalities’ aren’t available as 2028 tackling dummies.
= = =

Add in Walz, Slotkin, (maybe AOC?).


54 posted on 03/10/2025 12:30:33 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (Running Rampant, and not endorsing nonsense; My pronoun is EXIT. And I am generally full of /S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson