Posted on 03/07/2025 4:26:08 PM PST by grundle
BREAKING (not really though)
Fmr. President Joe Biden did NOT sign a single pardon in his entire presidency.
Everything that was signed allegedly by him was signed by Jeffrey Zients.
ANYTHING and EVERYTHING signed by him should be invalid and investigated by the DOJ.
Did any of the Congress critters have a public, recorded signing ceremony but then have an autosigned document entered into the official record instead?
I would agree. If it’s important enough for an EO or and Law or similar, It should be signed by hand.
This isn’t personal matters of signing a document for yourself or family.
This is for a country!
“Oh, he signed it. He just didn’t know what he was signing at times...”
Did you see the side-by-side comparison of his known signature with the faked ones? Not even close.
Sorry. Cabinet members.
What presidency was this under?
For Congress? I have no idea but all the documents that were signed by law were as if the secretary signed it himself.
Who has access to the office camera footage?
Trump.
"you read it"
Are you casting doubt on "Liberal Tear Creator. Political Satirist. Follow me and join the club."
That might work the same as a state registrar authorizing office staff to use his signature stamp and embossed seal.
But things that can only be done personally by the President of the US is a different story. And when the POTUS is on camera signing a document but the “copy” of that signed document that makes it into the official record DOESN’T have a physically-signed signature on it, that is proof of a fraudulent document being submitted into the official record.
I don’t know legalities, but I’m thinking that if whoever signed things did it with his permission, it’s legal.
Just another symptom of government out of control. If you want the paycheck and the resume line item, do your job.
Just sharing that the use of auto-pens is a common practice in DC.
Yes I imagine it is. But the evidence here is that what Biden physically signed is NOT what was submitted into the official record. Those who say this is no big deal because autopens ate used ignore the other half of the evidence: the video ofBiden personally signing a document whose official “copy” has an auto signature instead.
It would be a shame if genuine proof of fraud was pooh-poohed here and elsewhere because people ignore half of the evidence.
The issue is why all these “copies” in the official record have auto signatures when Biden is on video signing “them” by hand. THAT is the issue. What was put into the official is documentably NOT what Biden actually signed
On one of our trips to DC, we went to his office and he showed us that he had a 1-2” stack of papers needing to be signed. The secretary had three different signature plates (forget the reason why) but each document was cataloged for posterity. If the secretary had to physically read and sign every document, he’d have spent 18 hours a day just doing that.
Maybe the Trump administration is making such a show of signing things for a reason...
Biden told Mike Johnson that he never signed an eo to ban LNG but did sign an eo authorizing study of the effects of LNG. But what is in the official record with an autopen signature is what Biden insisted he had NEVER signed and NOT what he was sure he did sign.
That, right there, tells you that the autopen was used WITHOUT Biden’s approval. And the autopen signature instead of the real videotaped signature by Biden in the “copies” in the official record let us know that those are NOT actual copies of what Biden physically signed.
bump
So the executive orders he signed on the first day are all fake?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.