Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Trump urges Congress to 'get rid of the CHIPS Act' which would impact Intel
Rochester First ^ | Mar 5, 2025 / 10:15 AM EST | Clare Normoyle & Andrew Donovan

Posted on 03/05/2025 8:11:55 AM PST by Miami Rebel

SYRACUSE, N.Y. (WSYR-TV) — President Donald Trump called on lawmakers to repeal the CHIPS and Science Act during his March 4 address to Congress, possibly putting a target on the money already allocated for Micron’s $100 billion project in Central New York.

“You should get rid of the CHIPS Act, and whatever’s left over, Mr. Speaker, you should use it to reduce debt, or any other reason you want to,” said Trump.

The CHIPS and Science Act is the law used to entice Micron to move to Central New York. Federal funding that ensures Micron’s $100 billion mega fab in the Town of Clay is part of a legally binding, signed contract between the federal government and Micron.

Onondaga County Executive Ryan McMahon posted on social media during the early morning hours of March 5 to ensure Central New Yorkers that Micron is still on.

“First and foremost, the Micron project is full steam ahead!” said McMahon. “The comments made by the President tonight clearly state that he believes any funding that may remain should be reallocated. This does not apply to the Micron project.”

McMahon explained his administration has been working with Trump’s administration and multiple federal agencies to help keep Micron on track.

“Lastly, it is worth noting that the Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, has previously told lawmakers that the CHIPS act is ‘an excellent down payment’ to rebuild the sector. At this point any insinuation that funding for the historic investment being made by Micron is in jeopardy is misguided,” said the county executive.

Back in December 2024, Senator Chuck Schumer said that the money is “locked in” and would support the first of four promised fabs.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: chipsact; newyork
The CHIPS Act had strong bipartisan support and has led to investment in many states, most heavily Ohio and Texas.

If we don't want to subsidize tech companies, that's a great rationale for eliminating it. The downside is that there is zero probability that semiconductor foundries will relocate here without it.

1 posted on 03/05/2025 8:11:55 AM PST by Miami Rebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel

“The CHIPS Act had strong bipartisan support”

When you throw money at red and blue states you can usually get bipartisan support.


2 posted on 03/05/2025 8:22:20 AM PST by JSM_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel

As I recall, the Chips act was larded up with so many onerous DEI requirements that it makes it difficult to adequately staff new manufacturing facilities.


3 posted on 03/05/2025 8:37:41 AM PST by rottndog (What comes after America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel

How old is Ponch now anyway?


4 posted on 03/05/2025 8:38:13 AM PST by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSM_Liberty
no kidding. lotta dough involved. reading about in in WIKI

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHIPS_and_Science_Act

The CHIPS and Science Act is a U.S. federal statute enacted by the 117th United States Congress and signed into law by President Joe Biden on August 9, 2022. The act authorizes roughly $280 billion in new funding to boost domestic research and manufacturing of semiconductors in the United States, for which it appropriates $52.7 billion.[1][2][3] The act includes $39 billion in subsidies for chip manufacturing on U.S. soil along with 25% investment tax credits for costs of manufacturing equipment, and $13 billion for semiconductor research and workforce training, with the dual aim of strengthening American supply chain resilience and countering China.[4][5]: 1  It also invests $174 billion in the overall ecosystem of public sector research in science and technology, advancing human spaceflight, quantum computing, materials science, biotechnology, experimental physics, research security, social and ethical considerations, workforce development and diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts at NASA, NSF, DOE, EDA, and NIST.[6][7][8][9][10][11]

The act does not have an official short title as a whole but is divided into three divisions with their own short titles: Division A is the CHIPS Act of 2022 (where CHIPS stands for the former "Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors" for America Act[12]); Division B is the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act; and Division C is the Supreme Court Security Funding Act of 2022.[13] By March 2024, analysts estimated that the act incentivized between 25 and 50 separate potential projects, with total projected investments of $160–200 billion and 25,000–45,000 new jobs. However, these projects are faced with delays in receiving grants due to bureaucratic hurdles and shortages of skilled workers, both during the construction phase and upon completion in the operational/manufacturing stage, where 40% of the permanent new workers will need two-year technician degrees and 60% will need four-year engineering degrees or higher.[14][15][16] In addition, Congress had routinely made several funding deals that underfunded key basic research provisions of the Act by tens of billions of dollars.[17][18]

5 posted on 03/05/2025 8:42:21 AM PST by stylin19a ( If you think it's hard to meet new people, try picking up the wrong golf ball)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rottndog

“the Chips act was larded up with so many onerous DEI requirement”

Really? Texas had no problem welcoming Samsung’s $4.7 billion investment in Taylor, Texas.


6 posted on 03/05/2025 8:51:34 AM PST by Miami Rebel (pro-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

“lotta dough involved.”

Yes. That was precisely the point.


7 posted on 03/05/2025 8:54:50 AM PST by Miami Rebel (pro-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Ponch is turning 76 in a few days and he has had a stroke so he shouldn’t be riding a motorcycle anymore. Ugh, everyone is getting old.


8 posted on 03/05/2025 9:00:26 AM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Geez, you ain’t kidding! Jimmy Johnson is 82, but at least he still has great hair.


9 posted on 03/05/2025 9:08:23 AM PST by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel

Only the prince of morons would move a fab to NY.
Every time they have tried moving a fab to the East Coast, it has been a huge failure.
IBM sold the last of its fab to GF and then GF dumped it.
Modern fabs cost at least 20B and then you MUST keep them full and running 110% all the time.

Intel used to be the best at this.
Not anymore.


10 posted on 03/05/2025 9:39:43 AM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

IMO he got old by the second season.


11 posted on 03/05/2025 9:41:18 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel

Government subsidies don’t work All they do is to encourage unions to ask for the moon continuously.


12 posted on 03/05/2025 10:42:58 AM PST by exPBRrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson