[A Formerly Proud Canadian]

OK. Here’s the thing, the Brits ALREADY signed a deal with Zippyyy, and have first claim on Ukie minerals.

[AnotherUnixGeek]

OK. Here’s the thing, the Brits ALREADY signed a deal with Zippyyy, and have first claim on Ukie minerals.

Is the British deal for exclusive rights to Ukraine's mineral resources? Or can both the US and the UK extract revenue from those mineral rights at the same time?

[E. Pluribus Unum]

OK. Here’s the thing, the Brits ALREADY signed a deal with Zippyyy, and have first claim on Ukie minerals.

The Brits got Ziggy to renege on the Minsk agreements, so the precedent has been set.

[dragnet2]

Here’s the thing, the Brits ALREADY signed a deal with Zippyyy, and have first claim on Ukie minerals.

Here's the thing, Trump can make a deal with the Russians for even more minerals at a better deal.

[Sarah Barracuda]

Yeah either that story about the UK signing the same deal with Zelenskyy is total bunk or if its true you can have TWO deals for the same thing it makes it null and void

[Liz]

Zelenskyy Caught Red-Handed Misleading the president of the US;
Explains Zelenskyy’s bizarre behavior during the Trump meeting

==================================================

US Army Lt Col (Ret.) Tony Shaffer reported on Newsmax how the minerals
deal was already locked in w/ Starmer as part of their “100-year agreement.”

Jan 16, 2025----Zelensky and Starmer sign 100 year partnership.

[DesertRhino]

Not to mention, they keep bragging that the mineral deal will tie America with Ukraine in perpetuity. What a sickening concept.

Not worth it.