Posted on 02/25/2025 6:27:14 AM PST by Rev M. Bresciani
NO Islam was a problem before the WEST existed.
No, the problem is they bring nothing but death and suffering to every place they inhabit. NOTHING good ever comes from the fake religion.
Their problems come from the fact they took a plan drawn up by a bandit that was intended to keep all their weapons pointing in the same direction and use it to build a religion that is psychotic and then a culture that simply will not functional except when it is at war.
So they have to be at war at all times or else the thing falls apart and since the guys at the top like money, power and having sex with anything they can get to hold still they keep in a constant state of war.
No one else is responsible for it but they themselves.
There, I have saved you hours of reading.
bkmk
Not quite, my dear drypowder FRiend. Consider:
The Sin principle that entered God's Creation and Satan as its Master and Conniving Liar is the root cause for unavoidable Islamic depravity. Mohammed was just a willing compliant subject of the Adversary, of whom the Edenic serpent and Mohammed's Allah are just a couple of many manifests of that embodiment.
But this is not restricted to Mohmmedanism alone. It is present in every human descending from the first woman that had no dread for disappointing, ignoring, disrespecting, and disobeying the warning of the Mighty Jehovah and the mate that He appointed her to listen to and assist.
Instead, she was ready and willing to listen to a sly and mischievist con artist, following the serpent's negative hints about the true warning of the consequences of becoming knowledgeable not only the surrounding goodness (which both she and her husband were fully experiencing), but also of evil (which she up to that point had not) personified in the entity addressing her.
Take it from there, down to the innovators of man-made cultic religions, from her and her son Cain, through the ages, down to Mohammed; and he was not the last. Include the falsifiers that made their version of "Christianity" the religious organ of the state, and Darwin who influenced Marx to emplace atheistic evolutionism, and Bp. Brooke Foss Westcott foisting on readers the neotheological "social gospel," as well as John Dewey's forceful implementation of Humanism in all our public schools through unionism of educators.
Mohammedanism would have gained no strength in the American culture had not these later Bible-denying Amendment-tolerated innovators sapped the moral rectitude of the Founder's when they gave a platform to the enemies of individual God-given freedom of each individual that resides in a democratic republic.
Enough now, much more can be said, but a concise selection of eternal truths would do, if we all refused to contemplate the evils coming out of the Musselmen and reject their counsel in any governmental elected, appointed, or bureaucratic position, denying them employment or funding in that sphere. You want separation of quasi-religious cults from governmental support? Well, here's our chance. Heathenish Islam is one of them.
Hope DJT can see the light regarding underlying foundations. No religious organization, no not any at all, nor any of their rites can do the job in this age.
The only escape from it for the individual is a total change of mind and dependancy for the righteousness that precedes application of the Golden Rule.
The True Gospel can be comprehensively summed up in two words; a person, and the process employed:
Be advised, come to grip with this sole solution.
Not if 3 of his comrades get killed in action!
True. But (as pointed out to atheists who fault God for evil in the world, which is a result of man being able to choose, thereby effecting others for good or evil, varying in scope and degrees via ripple effect), the ability to make moral consequential choices is meaningless unless there is something to choose btwn. Think of a world in which there was neither any command one could disobey neither someone to obey, and thus A+E could no nothing wrong. What would be the purpose of that? A+E would have never known sin, being like babies in that regard, but would you want a spouse who ever faced a choice btwn you and the competition?
Instead, she was ready and willing to listen to a sly and mischievist con artist, following the serpent's negative hints about the true warning of the consequences of becoming knowledgeable not only the surrounding goodness (which both she and her husband were fully experiencing), but also of evil (which she up to that point had not) personified in the entity addressing her.
The devil is more damnable than A+E since he sinned of his own according, being envious (versus having a valid claim of jealousy) of God's glory, position and possession, and is the Original Leftist, Godless Communist, and author of the victim entitlement mentality, and "Share the wealth" demand and its "Occupy Movement." Being cast down ("for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted" - Luke 18:14) for his utterly selfish self-willed presumption, then still seeking power, Lucifer next goes to Eve and seduces her by inculcating a "victim-entitlement mentality," inferring that God was deceiving her with His warning of the consequences of disobedience, for He was selfishly keeping back what was her right to have, which again was a demand that God needed to share the wealth with anyone who demanded it.
Of course, as with Communists and other liberals, the welfare of those they seduce with their message was not their actual goal, but that of selfishly obtaining power themselves by presenting themselves as the savior of those whom they inculcate the victim entitlement mentality (via constant reminders of actual injustices, and or magnifying or inventing such) with the result being progressive eventual overall oppression of all - except the elite deliverers..
Which is in stark contrast to the Lord Jesus, who sacrificially gave Himself for our sins, to liberate and lift up those who receive Him and bless those who sacrificially live out and share that faith by His Spirit in holiness, despite persecution, and in so doing serve others in love. (1 Thes. 1; Gal. 6:10; Heb. 6:9,20; Rv. 2; 3)
And while Lucifer, as a thief and a robber, sought to climb up to honor some other way (Jn. 10:1) than unselfish Godliness, but instead, in selfish self-will presumed to exalt himself as if he was God, in contrast, the sacrificial Divine Son of God, "made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross," (Philippians 2:7-8) And enables and motivates man unto unselfish faithfulness in heart and deed (Phil 2:13) - which man otherwise could not and would not do.
And yet Christ promises,
To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne. (Revelation 3:21)
And as a privilege,
there shall be no more curse: but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it; and his servants shall serve him: (Revelation 22:3)
Pardon my prolixity in propounding the crafty psychology of the prince of darkness, which I know well via his wiles he works on me with, but the long-suffering mercy of God endureth, glory to Him.
Is slime is the problem but dealing with it is the West's responsibility, and we've failed. If wolves are slaughtering your sheep, it's still up to you to protect the sheep and kill the wolves.
Washington's Farewell Address, 1797 — Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. . . . And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle. (Farewell Address, 1797; http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp)
John Adams (1735—July 4, 1826. Second President and one of the Founding Fathers. Assisted Thomas Jefferson in drafting the Declaration of Independence) — ..• ...we have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. (From a letter Adams wrote on 11 October 1798 to the officers of the First Brigade, Third Division, of the Massachusetts Militia).ion of the Militia of Massachusetts,” October 11, 1798)
• Statesmen, my dear Sir, may plan and speculate for Liberty, but it is Religion and Morality alone, which can establish the Principles upon which Freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free Constitution is pure Virtue, and if this cannot be inspired into our People in a greater Measure, than they have it now, they may change their Rulers and the forms of Government, but they will not obtain a lasting liberty. They will only exchange Tyrants and Tyrannies." (Letter to Zabdiel Adams, June 21, 1776; http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?ammem/hlaw:@field%28DOCID+@lit%28dg004210%29%29 Benjamin Rush (1746—1813. Founding Father; signer of the Declaration of Independence; Surgeon General of the Continental Army; ratifier of the U. S. Constitution; “Father of American Medicine”; treasurer of the U. S. Mint; “Father of Public Schools under the Constitution”) — By renouncing the Bible, philosophers swing from their moorings upon all moral subjects. It is the only correct map of the human heart that ever has been published. All systems of religion, morals, and government not founded upon it [the Bible] must perish, and how consoling the thought, it will not only survive the wreck of these systems but the world itself. “The Gates of Hell shall not prevail against it.” (Benjamin Rush, Letters of Benjamin Rush, L. H. Butterfield, editor (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1951), Vol. II, p. 936, to John Adams, January 23, 1807)
• I do not believe that the Constitution was the offspring of inspiration, but I am as satisfied that it is as much the work of a Divine Providence as any of the miracles recorded in the Old and New Testament. (^ibid Vol. I, p. 475, to Elias Boudinot on July 9, 1788)
• The great enemy of the salvation of man, in my opinion, never invented a more effective means of limiting Christianity from the world than by persuading mankind that it was improper to read the Bible at schools. ^ibid Vol. I, p. 521, to Jeremy Belknap on July 13, 1789
• We profess to be republicans, yet we neglect the only means of establishing and perpetuating our republican forms of government, that is, the universal education of our youth in the principles of Christianity by means of the Bible; for this divine book, above all others,favors that equality among all mankind, that respect for just laws, and all those sober and frugal virtues, which constitute the soul of republicanism.(Benjamin Rush, Essays, Literary, Moral & Philosophical (Philadelphia: Thomas & Samuel F. Bradford, 1798), p. 112,113, “A Defence of the Use of the Bible as a School Book; addressed to the Rev. Jeremy Belknap of Boston )
• The Bible, when not read in schools, is seldom read in any subsequent period of life. [T]he Bible… should be read in our schools in preference to all other books because it contains the greatest portion of that kind of knowledge which is calculated to produce private and public happiness. (^ibid pp. pp. 94, 100)
Abraham Lincoln (1809—1865. 16th President from 1861 to 1865; led his country through its greatest constitutional, military and moral crisis – the American Civil War – preserving the Union while ending slavery, and promoting economic and financial modernization) — It is the duty of nations, as well as of men, to own their dependence upon the overruling power of God and to recognize the sublime truth announced in the Holy Scriptures and proven by all history, that those nations only are blessed whose God is the Lord...
But we have forgotten God. We have forgotten the gracious Hand which preserved us in peace, and multiplied and enriched and strengthened us; and we have vainly imagined in the deceitfulness of our hearts, that all these blessings were produced be some superior wisdom and virtue of our own. Intoxicated with unbroken success, we have become too self-sufficient to feel the necessity of redeeming and preserving grace, too proud to pray to the God that made us!
It behooves us, then, to humble ourselves before the offended Power, to confess our national sins, and to pray for clemency and forgiveness.
Now, therefore, in compliance with the request, and fully concurring in the views of the Senate, I do, by this my proclamation, designate and set apart Thursday, the 30th day of April, 1863, as a day of national humiliation, fasting, and prayer. And I do hereby request all the People to abstain, on that day, from their ordinary secular pursuits, and to unite, at their several places of public worship and their respective homes, in keeping the day holy to the Lord, and devoted to the humble discharge of the religious duties proper to that solemn occasion.
Alexis de Tocqueville (1805—1859. French political thinker and historian; best known for his two volume, “Democracy in America”) —
Upon my arrival in the United States, the religious aspect of the country was the first thing that struck my attention; and the longer I stayed there, the more did I perceive the great political consequences resulting from this state of things, to which I was unaccustomed. In France I had almost always seen the spirit of religion and the spirit of freedom pursuing courses diametrically opposed to each other; but in America I found that they were intimately united, and that they reigned in common over the same country.
There are certain populations in Europe whose unbelief is only equaled by their ignorance and their debasement, while in America one of the freest and most enlightened nations in the world fulfills all the outward duties of religion with fervor.
The sects that exist in the United States are innumerable. They all differ in respect to the worship which is due to the Creator; but they all agree in respect to the duties which are due from man to man. Each sect adores the Deity in its own peculiar manner, but all sects preach the same moral law in the name of God...Moreover, all the sects of the United States are comprised within the great unity of Christianity, and Christian morality is everywhere the same...
In the United States the sovereign authority is religious, and consequently hypocrisy must be common; but there is no country in the whole world in which the Christian religion retains a greater influence over the souls of men than in America, and there can be no greater proof of its utility, and of its conformity to human nature, than that its influence is most powerfully felt over the most enlightened and free nation of the earth...
There is certainly no country in the world where the tie of marriage is more respected than in America or where conjugal happiness is more highly or worthily appreciated, In Europe almost all the disturbances of society arise from the irregularities of domestic life. To despise the natural bonds and legitimate pleasures of home is to contract a taste for excesses, a restlessness of heart, and fluctuating desires. Agitated by the tumultuous passions that frequently disturb his dwelling, the European is galled by the obedience which the legislative powers of the state exact. But when the American retires from the turmoil of public life to the bosom of his family, he finds in it the image of order and of peace...
The Americans combine the notions of Christianity and of liberty so intimately in their minds, that it is impossible to make them conceive the one without the other; and with them this conviction does not spring from that barren traditionary faith which seems to vegetate in the soul rather than to live...
Thus religious zeal is perpetually warmed in the United States by the fires of patriotism. These men do not act exclusively from a consideration of a future life; eternity is only one motive of their devotion to the cause. If you converse with these missionaries of Christian civilization, you will be surprised to hear them speak so often of the goods of this world, and to meet a politician where you expected to find a priest.
They will tell you that "all the American republics are collectively involved with each other; if the republics of the West were to fall into anarchy, or to be mastered by a despot, the republican institutions which now flourish upon the shores of the Atlantic Ocean would be in great peril. It is therefore our interest that the new states should be religious, in order that they may permit us to remain free." (Democracy in America, [New York: A. S. Barnes & Co., 1851), pp. 331, 332, 335, 336-7, 337; https://www.gutenberg.org/files/815/815-h/815-h.htm)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.