[ImJustAnotherOkie]

Most people realize that but breaking precedents is always a can of worms.

[Red Badger]

Andrew Jackson (D) set the precedent.................

[Cowgirl of Justice]

Didn’t seem to affect Bidet ignoring the SCOTUS decisions and doing whatever he wanted.

I mean, I agree with your statement but we see that the puppetmasters are furiously and desperately trying to stop what is happening through the use of their judges.

[ClearCase_guy]

The precedent was set in 1866 when the Supreme Court decided that the judiciary could not enjoin the President from performing his executive duties, particularly those involving discretion.

I see no reason this needs to move through the court system again. It's done. It's been decided.

Sure, we could go through it a second time. We could get the current Supreme Court to once again declare that the powers are co-equal but separate. We could do that a second time.

And then a third.
And then a fourth.

When does it stop? It stops when the President says "We're done here."