Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Judge Orders Trump’s CDC, HHS, and FDA to Restore Pro-Gender Ideology Webpages
American Greatness ^ | 11 Feb, 2025 | Debra Heine

Posted on 02/12/2025 4:43:41 AM PST by MtnClimber

A federal judge on Tuesday ordered the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to restore pro-gender ideology webpages after they were deleted in the wake of President Trump’s executive order banning government agencies from promoting gender ideology, CBS News reported Tuesday.

Trump’s EO, signed on his first day in office, stated that the U.S. recognizes two sexes, male and female, and directed agencies to “remove all statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications, or other internal and external messages that promote or otherwise inculcate gender ideology,” as well as “cease issuing such statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications or other messages.”

Days after the president issued his order, the Office of Personnel Management issued a memorandum ordering all agencies by 5 p.m. on Jan. 31 to take down all websites, social media accounts and other public-facing media “that inculcate or promote gender ideology.” In response to the memo, the CDC and FDA took offline numerous webpages and data sets, including recommendations on how physicians should treat sexually transmitted infections and adult immunization guidance.

While the wording on some websites was adjusted to adhere to Mr. Trump’s directive, allowing them to stay online, other information, like data from the CDC’s Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System, was removed completely.

The agency said in a banner on its main website that it was “being modified to comply with President Trump’s executive orders.”

U.S. District Judge John Bates, a George W. Bush appointee, granted a temporary restraining order sought by the left-wing nonprofit Doctors for America (originally Doctors For Obama). The activist group was founded in 2008 by Dr. Vivek Murthy, who went on to become Joe Biden’s surgeon general. Doctors For America argued that its members had used the websites for treating patients and conducting research and that the removal of the webpages violated federal law.

Bates, 78, found that the group was likely to succeed in its claim that HHS, the CDC and FDA acted unlawfully when they scrubbed transgender ideology from their public websites.

“It bears emphasizing who ultimately bears the harm of defendants’ actions: everyday Americans, and most acutely, underprivileged Americans, seeking healthcare,” he wrote. Citing declarations from two doctors filed in the case, Bates said if they “cannot provide these individuals the care they need (and deserve) within the scheduled and often limited time frame, there is a chance that some individuals will not receive treatment, including for severe, life-threatening conditions. The public thus has a strong interest in avoiding these serious injuries to the public health.”

Judge John Bates was the judge in the tragic case of Matthew Perna, the j6er who hung himself after Biden DOJ prosecutors sadistically threw the book at him for peacefully trespassing.

The judge said that after the gender ideology info was taken down, doctors were forced to look elsewhere for such material, making “their jobs harder and their treatment less effective,” but that HHS, CDC and FDA faced no burden by keeping the webpages up.

“There is nothing in either the OPM memorandum or the record, and indeed defendants proffered no information at the hearing, to suggest the restoration of the removed webpages would pose a burden on the agencies’ ability to engage in their work,” Bates wrote. “Similarly, there is no information to suggest that restoring public access would even interfere with the agencies’ ongoing efforts to conform those resources with the president’s executive orders.”

The judge ordered the agencies to restore earlier versions of their websites by 11:59 p.m. Tuesday.

Senator Mike Lee registered his disapproval of the judge’s decision on X: “These judges are waging an unprecedented assault on legitimate presidential authority, all the way down to dictating what webpages the government has,” Lee wrote. “This is absurd.”

Reacting with equal dismay, DOGE Chief Elon Musk called for Judge Bates to be fired.

“Truly absurd. Judges as website editors!?” he posted on X. “We should at least ATTEMPT to fire this junky jurist.” He added: “The notion of having a judge job for life, no matter how bad the judgments, is ridiculous! Enough is enough.”


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: gaymafia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

1 posted on 02/12/2025 4:43:41 AM PST by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

There should be a way to get rid of activist judges.


2 posted on 02/12/2025 4:43:52 AM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Does the Judge get to dictate the content?

SCOTUS will reverse all this.

Just some heel dragging by the loons on the left.


3 posted on 02/12/2025 4:45:20 AM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Is john Bates Gay?


4 posted on 02/12/2025 4:45:38 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

No. Judges do not get to make policy. Ignore this unconstitutional order and appeal it.


5 posted on 02/12/2025 4:47:43 AM PST by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“No. Your move, Judge.”

L


6 posted on 02/12/2025 4:48:21 AM PST by Lurker ( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

White text with white background,


7 posted on 02/12/2025 4:49:10 AM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“Sorry, that server has been removed from the network and data destroyed”


8 posted on 02/12/2025 4:49:54 AM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

"Bow before me. I am NOW your king."

9 posted on 02/12/2025 4:50:55 AM PST by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
Just some heel dragging by the loons on the left.

This is a GW Bush appointee. And who knows whether some Trump appointee might not join him in this ruling? When even Republican presidents are nominating idiots who can't understand the separation of powers between the branches of government, we're in trouble.
10 posted on 02/12/2025 4:51:07 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
There is an in-depth analysis online about federal judicial power which argues that, unlike the President, a federal judge can be impeached with a simple majority vote of Congress. I've also seen legal arguments that a federal judge is limited to decisions involving their own district and not nationwide mandates.

These judicial overreaches have to be challenged and overturned.

11 posted on 02/12/2025 4:51:30 AM PST by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

One judge has articles of impeachment being drawn up. Time for number two!


12 posted on 02/12/2025 4:53:50 AM PST by mistfree (Fear Destroys Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Missouri gal

The President is also impeached by a simple majority vote in the House of Representatives.


13 posted on 02/12/2025 4:55:19 AM PST by Jim Noble (Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Since when is a judge in charge of Government web pages. What a doofus.


14 posted on 02/12/2025 4:55:28 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

No.

Judgie-poo has no standing.


15 posted on 02/12/2025 4:57:14 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Nitzy: New and Improved! Now with only 66% anti-semitic posts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

At least 95% of our lawyers...and judges...are Maoists.


16 posted on 02/12/2025 4:57:28 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Import The Third World,Become The Third World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mistfree

Do you mean a judge is drawing up impeachment papers (can a judge do that?), or someone is drawing them up against the judge?


17 posted on 02/12/2025 4:58:13 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (It's hard not to celebrate the fall of bad people. - Bongino)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

See Post #16


18 posted on 02/12/2025 4:58:22 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Import The Third World,Become The Third World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

NEW PAGE

If you were born with male parts and think you are a female, you have a mental problem.

If you were born with a large opening in the front of your lower abdomen and think you are a male, you have a mental problem.


19 posted on 02/12/2025 4:58:38 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
SCOTUS will reverse all this.

That's their game plan. To tie everything up/delay POTUS Trump's legitimate actions to the point that nothing gets done. They did it during his first term and are doing it now.

It's the RAT conspiracy and there's nothing we can do about it. Low level federal judiciary pimps acting outside their bounds of authority to gain accolades from communist and perverted liberals.

20 posted on 02/12/2025 4:59:33 AM PST by LouAvul (1 John 2:22: He that denies that Jesus is the Christ is a liar and antichrist. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson