Posted on 02/11/2025 5:39:29 PM PST by BenLurkin
Attorneys for a group of news organizations, including NPR, said in a legal filing on Tuesday that evidence used at the sentencing of a rioter charged in the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol had "disappeared" from an online government platform.
The missing evidence consists of nine video exhibits from the Justice Department's case against Glen Simon, who pleaded guilty to a charge of "Disorderly and Disruptive Conduct in a Restricted Building or Grounds." Simon said as part of his plea that he pushed against police officers with a metal bike rack, stormed the U.S. Capitol and recorded himself saying "this is what a revolution looks like," and, "we gotta show these f****** we ain't f****** around. It's the only way to get it done. Fear!"
So far, the absence of video files appears to only have affected Simon's case. It is unclear whether the Department of Justice intentionally removed the files. A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, which handled all of the Jan. 6 criminal cases, declined to comment citing the ongoing litigation.
The development raised alarms among former prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases, who told NPR they fear the Trump administration will purge records of that day's violence as part of an attempt to whitewash history.
On his first day in office, Trump granted clemency to all of the more than 1,500 defendants charged in connection with Jan. 6, including those who assaulted police and those with lengthy prior criminal records. Since then, the Justice Department has removed a government website that provided information on all of the cases. The new interim U.S. Attorney in Washington, DC, Ed Martin, was previously an advocate for Jan. 6 defendants, who was part of the pro-Trump protest outside the Capitol that day. He was not charged with any wrongdoing.
Over the weekend, Trump told reporters that the rioters he pardoned "didn't assault" and were instead "assaulted by our government." Hundreds of rioters were convicted or pleaded guilty to assaulting police on Jan. 6. Approximately 140 police officers suffered injuries, according to the Department of Justice.
"A lot of politicians' careers now depend on the record of the attack on the Capitol being rewritten," said Brendan Ballou, a former federal prosecutor who worked on Jan. 6 cases. "Making these exhibits widely available will make it harder for people to hide the history of what happened on January 6."
Over the course of the Jan. 6 criminal cases, the group of media organizations that made this filing fought for — and won — access to court exhibits from the government through an online platform similar to Dropbox.
Recently, one of the attorneys noticed the files from Simon's case were no longer available, according to their filing.
On Feb. 10, they contacted the government and asked for officials to restore the "missing evidence," explain what had happened and confirm that no other records will be removed without notice.
The government's lawyers promised a response "as expeditiously as possible," according to the filing, but had not provided any explanation as of mid-day on Feb. 11. Now the media outlets are asking the court to step in and order the government to make the exhibits available, and provide an explanation for what happened within 48 hours.
"Although the prosecutions and related criminal proceedings against individuals convicted of assaulting police officers, vandalizing the Capitol, and obstructing justice on January 6 have been dismissed," attorneys for the press coalition stated in their filing, "the public continues to have a powerful interest in the judicial records submitted in the Capitol Cases, including the Video Exhibits."
They are concerned about whitewashing one side of history. They weren’t concerned about the whitewashing that was done on the other side.
maybe the records are in the same memory hole as the hundreds of hours of peaceful security footage we never got to see.
I can think of another government media expense that DOGE can cut.
Traitor Liz Cheney should be told destroying evidence going forward wont be covered by the dementia carcasses pardon.
Sounds like a job for a teenage computer whiz. Somebody ping Big Balls.
If only those videos are affected, then how come the rest aren’t online for perusal?
Along with the phone data from the egg timer pipe bomber?
This spin is rich...
Many, many DOJ/FIB ‘critters still need to GO.
If these attorneys are for transparency, how come none of their names are given?
Simon sounds like a paid actor, like the Utah connected Insurgence USA guy, Sullivan. Maybe they should see if USAID paid his fee to CNN.
“Somebody ping Big Balls.”
No doubt the man himself, Harry Bolz, is already on it.
They must be looking to use the video make some tearful ads with the weeping ghosts of all the police and puppies and kittens that perished that day beneath the barricades, when Democracy died and all.
Technically, it is Harry Bōlz.
😉
Smarty pants.
I’m still cracking up over the whole thing.
“This is the single funniest image in the history of cable news. The longer you look at it the better it gets.”
https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/1887664333175595248
Sounds like they want one of their Obama stooge-"judges" to step in...
never forget the reason for the left’s treason, a peaceful protest to protect election integrity.https://rumble.com/v181401-january-6th-rally-2021.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.