Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cronos

**They are Africans - they have been there for 500 years and their ancestry predates the entry of Zulu peoples into south Africa. Why should they leave their ancestral lands?**

How’s your math?


41 posted on 02/06/2025 8:33:42 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: DIRTYSECRET
well, not 500 - that was hyperbole on my part I admit.

The Boers arrived in the Cape of Good Hope to settle from 1652 -- that is 370 years.

When the Boers came, the native people were Khoi-San

Now they may look "black", but genetically they are as far away from Bantu-speaking "black Africans" as those Bantu-speakers are from us.

The Bantu-speakers like Zulus came from west Africa and they expanded when they discovered agriculture (this was completely independent of the discoveries of agriculture in the fertile crescent or in the yangtze valley)

The Bantu-speakers' agriculture was suitable for the tropics with cassava etc. - so their expansion halted at what is now the borders of south africa

the earlier Khoi-San (who had separated thousands of years earlier) were hunter-gatherers so were less dependent on the crop and the Boers came from temperate climates with temperate crops

Zulu expansion came with the adoption of european crops.

43 posted on 02/06/2025 8:51:20 AM PST by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson