Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump signs order creating first-ever US sovereign wealth fund —and TikTok could be its first purchase
nypost.com ^ | Feb. 3, 2025 | Diana Glebova and Steven Nelson

Posted on 02/04/2025 5:07:08 AM PST by V_TWIN

WASHINGTON — President Trump signed an executive order Monday to create a sovereign US wealth fund — saying that TikTok may become one of its first acquisitions.

A sovereign wealth fund is an investment fund owned and operated by a government. The world’s largest and wealthiest such funds are owned by China and resource-rich countries like Norway and Middle Eastern emirates.

It was not immediately specified how the US endowment — the creation of which was first reported last month by The Post’s Charles Gasparino — would be capitalized, but Trump previously floated using tariff proceeds.

It’s unclear if adding a stake in TikTok would require up-front investment, or if Beijing would offload it without charge to avoid a looming 10% levy that Trump announced Friday.

“It’s a very exciting event. We’re going to have a sovereign wealth fund, which we’ve never had,” Trump said in the Oval Office — as News Corp founder Rupert Murdoch and Oracle billionaire Larry Ellison sat nearby.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 02/04/2025 5:07:08 AM PST by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

Is it a coincidence that the Crypto and AI czar is giving a major speech today?

I don’t know, that’s why I’m asking :)


2 posted on 02/04/2025 5:09:29 AM PST by dp0622 (Tried a coup, a fake tax story, tramp slander, Russia nonsense, impeachment and a virus. They lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

BAD IDEA.


3 posted on 02/04/2025 5:09:39 AM PST by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

“President Trump signed an executive order Monday to create a sovereign US wealth fund — saying that TikTok may become one of its first acquisitions”

So tax payer money will be used to buy a private company.


4 posted on 02/04/2025 5:12:18 AM PST by JSM_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

Not sure I like an official government slush fund.


5 posted on 02/04/2025 5:13:15 AM PST by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety

I agree. On this side of eternity, bad idea. On the other side, maybe not so bad.


6 posted on 02/04/2025 5:13:31 AM PST by Jonty30 (Groundhogs don't falsify their predictions for grant money, whereas climate scientists do. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

In the past election, TikTok was an absolute hotbed of support for Trump, especially for black men that defected from the democrats. Hard to imagine that would have been allowed if the US government owned it.
This is the first bad idea of his. No thanks to government or big tech taking it over. That would ruin it. Might as well turn it over directly to the CIA/FBI and cut out the middleman.
We still hang to think of the day a democrat comes into office.


7 posted on 02/04/2025 5:17:44 AM PST by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2025... RETURN OF THE JEDI...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety
I agree. I think Trump will do good things with it, but when the democrats get back in power, they will do what they always do—grossly abuse it to further their agenda.

We don’t need anything that will make the government bigger and more powerful.

8 posted on 02/04/2025 5:17:50 AM PST by volare737 (Diversity is something to be overcome, not celebrated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

In the past election, TikTok was an absolute hotbed of support for Trump, especially for black men that defected from the democrats. Hard to imagine that would have been allowed if the US government owned it.
This is the first bad idea of his. No thanks to government or big tech taking it over. That would ruin it. Might as well turn it over directly to the CIA/FBI and cut out the middleman.
We still need to think of the day a democrat comes into office.


9 posted on 02/04/2025 5:19:09 AM PST by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2025... RETURN OF THE JEDI...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

Musk wants help getting out of his Bitcoin position


10 posted on 02/04/2025 5:19:17 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

Where in the US Constitution does the government get privileges to tax us to compete against us by operating a private enterprise?


11 posted on 02/04/2025 5:19:38 AM PST by CodeToad ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

So the government is going to pick and choose companies they think are good investments? And then they have a fiduciary interest in their success?

That doesn’t sound very American.

Strategic reserves are one thing…stockpiling natural resources is one thing. Buying social media companies is quite another.


12 posted on 02/04/2025 5:21:20 AM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

We are lacking the first pre-requisite for a SWF, and that is Sovereign Wealth. We have only sovereign debt. We are a debtor nation. The countries with a SWF are usually small nations that have cash to invest, often from selling oil. The whole notion is ludicrous, but it will be a good way for Trump to enrich his cronies, so I expect it will continue to be talked about. How will it be funded? No clue.


13 posted on 02/04/2025 5:21:55 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Good point. SWFs such as Norway’s and Alaska’s and Texas’ and Russia’s are typically based on natural resources. Getting too general in scope could cause other conflicts.


14 posted on 02/04/2025 5:22:21 AM PST by posterchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

Imagine poppy pants Biden with trillions of dollars of “fun money” in a Sovereign Wealth Fund.

Because that or worse will happen some day.

How well did the government do with the Social Security money you sent them from your paycheck?

Pay down the debt. Cut taxes. Don’t give government more control of resources.


15 posted on 02/04/2025 5:23:23 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Call Traitor General Milley back into service, bust him to private, courtmartial, convict, hang.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

The government is about to have a huge influx of money from tariffs. That will easily fund this. It is a brilliant idea.


16 posted on 02/04/2025 5:25:50 AM PST by sipow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
Yes, when the democrats take control, they will use this slush fund in ways totally unimaginable now—to further their agenda or fund their far-left pet projects.

They will look at it as just another way to ‘pick the pocket’ of our economy (just like they do with the tax code now).

17 posted on 02/04/2025 5:33:23 AM PST by volare737 (Diversity is something to be overcome, not celebrated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety

Seems to work out pretty well for Norway and Saudi. Like a government endowment fund. I don’t see the downside, as long as it is managed openly and responsibly. There would need to be guardrails to keep it from being used to manipulate markets. Probably less hazardous than bad actors like BlackRock and the hedge fund universe.


18 posted on 02/04/2025 5:33:36 AM PST by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

Good point. It works be the next USAID slush fund. And besides, we are 37 trillion in debt. We don’t have money for a slush fund. It’s bad if there government owns a social media company, it’s worse if it’s a public private partnership Benito would approve of.


19 posted on 02/04/2025 5:33:42 AM PST by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2025... RETURN OF THE JEDI...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety

Very bad idea.


20 posted on 02/04/2025 5:41:38 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson