Posted on 01/22/2025 7:31:45 AM PST by vespa300
Kamala Harris was all smiles and affection for her 'beloved' second gentleman, Doug Emhoff in the immediate aftermath of her crushing presidential election defeat.
But now that President Donald Trump has been sworn into office, for sore loser Harris, it is now all about the blame game, and her target has flipped to her 'dead weight' husband.
And as she weighs her political future – maybe a 2026 run for Governor of California or another try for the nation's top job two years later – she has to consider whether Emhoff is an asset or a liability.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
I don’t really see her as a sore loser like say, Hillary. I think she’s relieved to not have won and now she can just play victim. Not to mention the millions of dollars she skimmed off of her campaign slush fund.
And I don’t blame him.
I’d say so, ironically.
Tackles got where she is by providing....services... for powerful men. She is not spring chicken and doesn’t have the charisma, talent, or political skills to accomplish anything on her own. She is finished.
Obviously.
Kamala Harris-Obama.
Nanny nanny boo boo! :-)
As usual.
>> If they do, get divorced, who gets the kid?
The loser.
It just proves that Harris is not a person for the people, but for herself. She slept her way into positions, the most noteable Willie Brown former mayor of San Francisco that got her the AG job, and she is a user to achieve any success she has gained.
I was surprized to find out Imhoff founded and ran a house painting business as it made him a worthless political tool for her. But by getting rid of him she can go back to the “catting” ways of her getting what she wanted trying to bed those that can be an assistance to her comeback.
And it is going to be a long and difficult trip with what she has done and aligned herself with. She has proven herself just as worthless to the country and she felt her husband was to her. So it’s a fair trade. He gets away from her and she can live her life like she wants, like the trashy slut she was in the past. And that’s no surprize.
wy69
>>And as she weighs her political future – maybe a 2026 run for Governor of California or another try for the nation’s top job two years later – she has to consider whether Emhoff is an asset or a liability.
It’s California; Harris’ marriage to a “male” is a liability. She’ll need to go lesbo or tranny if she wants to be Gov.
He’s just about to find out how California deals with unreconcilable differences and community property. He’s going to get his clock cleaned.
If I were Emhoff, I’d ask myself, “Is Kamala an asset or a liability?” Then, wafter determining the clear answer, I’d fake my own death and relocate far away.
“If they do, get divorced, who gets the kid?”
If it were her kid, which it isn’t, I figure: “You take her.” “No. YOU take her!” “I don’t want her.” “I don’t want her, either.”
Mike??
And every important sensible decision requires and equally sensible back plan.
In the case of living with Kamala, the sensible back up plan consists of not faking it.
Why should we believe everything that the Daily Fail prints?
Right!?
Let’s examine this from a sexual marketplace value standpoint.
He’s a jerk but is wealthy and isn’t ugly. I don’t think, always have a hard time judging that about dudes, as a dude. Anyway . . .
She slept her way into a high level of politics, but is likely all washed up there.
He wins this calculus by a landslide.
I rest my case.
The kids were just a stage prop. they didn’t really exist.
And the rumors of a New York - LA lifestyle may fit his predilections just fine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.