Posted on 01/13/2025 6:04:08 AM PST by Red Badger
It is a hypothesis based on mathematics.
It is a theory in which the proposers are attempting to devise an experiment which could be used to test the theory.
That’s called “science.”
I’ve always been fond of large bosons.
...an experiment which could be used to get a government grant...................
It is part of science.
Repeatable experiments to confirm results are the heart of science.
Suggesting speculation. Hypothecating guesses. Hinting at something hopeful.
And readying the next government grant proposal(s).
Bosons produce hadrons.
It’s Turtles All The Way Down!
Watch it, Buddy. Keep your over-excited fermions in your pants.
“We determined that new types of particles we never knew of before are possible,”
Disclaimer: I don’t believe in quantum nonsense.
Comment: That is what passes for scientific research these days?
“Something we never thought of is possible.”
How does the grant money continue to flow based on this “thinking”?
Easy.
The people giving it out are stupid..................
“Bosons produce hadrons.”
Watching them collide. LOL
I dee what you sid there.
Does this contradict the concept of electron shells in an atom, i.e. that the first shell can hold up to two electrons, the second up to eight, the third up to 18, etc.?
(I'm sure I don't understand all this. I've sat down and gone right through the chair onto the floor.)
This is a big fallacy of Karl Marx's theories. After a world-wide dictatorship is established and all people are brought under its control (i.e. the control of its leaders), a miracle occurs and--presto!--there is no longer any need for any government and paradise is attained!
The most miraculous thing of all is that some people are stupid enough to fall for this!
(Sorry to change the subject, but I just felt like a rant.)
They are charm-ing.
No. But it is a fix, because THEOretically the electrons should be able to exist in random “spin” states but they don’t seem to when they are in the same atomic orbital. So that became the Pauli exclusion principle. It doesn’t explain “why” but it is a widely accepted lynchpin for further discovery.
Early “physics” was called “natural philosophy”...now it seems to be driven by mathematical philosophy coupled with experiments which affirm the math or cast doubt on the mathematical model. Every “understanding” nowadays of physics seem to be tentative because it can be based on different maths. When they discover “Maxwells Demons” that’s gonna be a hoot.
IMHO.
QED
PAGING SHELDON COOPER
Paging Mayim Bialik, she’s an actual SCIENTIST!...........
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.