CDC: 7 routine vaccine injections in 1986 to over 200 routine vaccine injections in 2025

X ^

[TigerClaws]

CDC just published its 2025 vaccine schedules. We have now gone from 7 routine vaccine injections in 1986 to over 200 routine vaccine injections in 2025.

In 1986, before vaccine makers had broad immunity to liability for injuries, CDC's schedule had 7 routine childhood injections and none for adults or pregnant women.

CDC's 2025 schedule has 5 routine injections during pregnancy, over 70 routine childhood injections (birth to age 18), and over 130 routine adult injections (up to age 79). Counting non-routine injections, there are even more.

Here is an image comparing injections up to only 1 year of age between 1986 and 2024 (updated chart for 2025 and tweets about each of these vaccines to follow...):

1983 schedule: https://cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/images/schedule1983s.jpg

1986 law: https://congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546; https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/562/223/

2025 childhood schedule: https://cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/downloads/child/0-18yrs-child-combined-schedule.pdf

2025 adult schedule: https://cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/downloads/adult/adult-combined-schedule.pdf

2025 pregnancy schedule: https://cdc.gov/vaccines-pregnancy/hcp/vaccination-guidelines/index.html

[linMcHlp]

The ever-increasing list if "health-care" "professional" parasites attacking patients.

[goodnesswins]

So...what is equivalent Euro vax list, I wonder.

[Dalberg-Acton]

[DoodleBob]

I find that a picture helps illuminate how much may be too much or too little.

I counted about 21 injections by 6 months of age.

[exDemMom]

Well, my goodness. As vaccines are developed and the body of research grows, the recommendations are updated to reflect the latest data.

I seriously see no down side to protecting children from infectious diseases that can have lifelong consequences and potentially decrease overall lifespan even if the disease does not kill immediately.

Of course, those kooks who believe that humans are overpopulated and our population must be decreased ASAP by any means possible aren’t happy with the vaccine recommendations.

[Missouri gal]

Vaccines slam the immune system hard. Maybe ok for the average adult. Can be deadly or very destructive to babies, kids, anybody with immune defects. I stopped taking flu shots when I saw the CDC data shows that they are low in effectiveness; about 20 percent on average.

[erlayman]

RFK Jr tells the story behind the Hepatitis B vaccine for babies. According to him. the manufacturers (Merck or GlaxoSmithKline) complained to the FDA when it wasn’t selling to adults as promised so the HHS came back and said no problem, we’ll just put it on the schedule for children.

The game is up for them now that we have director that nearly lost his voice and suffered permanent neurological damage after a routine flu vaccine.

[bgill]

I still wonder why virologist, Dr. Timothy Cunningham, suddenly stomped off the CDC complex in Atlanta still in his lab coat only to be found “drowned” in the nearby river while looking for pretty rocks.

Not to worry if you’ve missed a few jabs, they’ll be putting it in our food without our knowledge or consent. Heck, it’s probably already in it. I didn’t give Billy Boy consent to put his Apeel on my produce with and it can’t be washed off.

[fella]

Big Pharma has gotten way to big and it’s not healthy for We The People.

[Worldtraveler once upon a time]

---- "provide a direct and explicit quote"

You do math. How do you get the right side of the rquation to get to zero?

Gates' explication of the variables follows the above, in the article cited. Think he's correct?

Bill Gates: the energy breakthrough that will “save our planet” is less than 15 years away Vox, 24 February 2024.

Billionaires Try to Shrink World's Population, Report Says" Wall Street Journal, 26 May 2009.

By the way, the Chronicle of Philanthropy article referenced by WSJ fifteen years ago is no longer online. As to "C," the percentage of carbon in a normal human is about 23 percent. So "P" portion which is also C in the equation can be seen also as ( P x .23 ).

Bill Gates says 'the scariest thing of all' is Ukraine war because it is a 'distraction' from climate change

[DugwayDuke]

Worldtraveler once upon a time wrote: “You do math. How do you get the right side of the rquation to get to zero?-—”

So, you can’t provide a direct and explicit quote from Gates
icit quote where he claims vaccines are the ideal way to depopulate the world?

Don’t feel bad, no one else can provide that quote either.

[Worldtraveler once upon a time]

You're cute. But I don't feel bad, because I have seen your game before.

I replied with related things, to which Dugway Duke makes no "direct or explicit" remark.

[bgill]

My mother gets a covid booster every time a new one comes out or if it’s a Tuesday. She ended up in the hospital twice due to spike proteins. Then had a couple months stay in rehab where they wouldn’t let me talk to her on the phone. Found out from her later they were wanting to keep her until a new doctor ordered her home. Evil! She had previously been healthier than all of us and took daily walks through the neighborhood. She came home on a walker and has care workers come in.

[Secret Agent Man]

It has wonderful plausible deniability built right into it as well.

[exDemMom]

There must be more transparency and much more rigor in testing and approving vaccines. The CDC has devolved into the enforcement arm and drug dealer of Big Pharma to the detriment of Americans’ health and well-being.

The CDC is involved with infectious disease research. This includes the development of the vaccine schedules, but not the research and development (R&D) aspects of vaccine development. The FDA, not the CDC, oversees the drug development process and makes the final decisions on whether a drug is approved for patient use or not. Yes, vaccines are a class of drug.

There actually is a lot of transparency regarding drug R&D. Prior to clinical testing, the drugs are described in publications in medical/scientific journals along with the results of the early testing in vitro, in cells, and in animals. The database to find articles detailing medical research is located at www.pubmed.gov. When the FDA allows the drug to advance to clinical testing, most researchers register their clinical trials at www.clinicaltrials.gov. They post the trial design, the method of soliciting volunteers for the trial, and often the preliminary results of the trials. Clinical Trials is a searchable website, so you can search for trials on any drug you want there, with a lot of search parameters to narrow down the search. And then, if you want to see the FDA's considerations concerning the approval of any specific drug, they maintain a website where you can access the decision papers along with the research data that led them to the decision. The website is www.fda.gov, but I'm not making that a link since you find the drug-specific pages more easily by doing an internet search, for example, for "pfizer Covid vaccine fda approval."

As far as rigor goes, I like to tell this story: when I oversaw a division of about 100 scientists, lab techs, students, and interns, we had one drug that we were particularly interested in advancing to clinical trials. But prior to human trials, it is necessary to test in animals. So the team responsible for that drug's development gave it to rabbits. One rabbit died. The FDA told us to immediately stop further testing on that drug until we could answer to their satisfaction why that rabbit died. We had to be able to demonstrate that the reason the rabbit died was because of a quirk of rabbit physiology that does not exist in humans. It took about six months to do that investigation and demonstrate to the FDA that humans would not die if given that drug. As I always like to point out, if the FDA is that concerned over a *rabbit* death, then how much more concerned are they about human health?

The issue is not that there is no transparency or rigor for testing and approving vaccines. The issue is that this is all highly technical data which most people do not know how to look up and do not have the specialized education needed to understand it.

[Secret Agent Man]

Excellent news :)

[OHPatriot]

EVERY CDC employee should take EVERY ONE of these vaccines EVERY YEAR!!!

CDC employees need to have some skin in the game.

[exDemMom]

I’m no expert, but I’ve often wondered how much “immunization” is good for our bodies. A little might be helpful, but are we overdoing it now? I think there can be too much of a good thing.

You really cannot overload the immune system. It is capable of producing trillions of different antibodies. Since there are not trillions of infectious diseases, this means that your immune system is more than capable of handling any number of vaccinations, along with the usual millions of different microorganisms you encounter every day.

A vaccine teaches your immune system how to fight a specific pathogen by exposing it to a tiny noninfectious part of that pathogen. If you get sick with that pathogen, your immune system also (usually) learns how to fight that pathogen. One way, you just get a little poke in the arm. The other way, you feel horrible and a lot of stress is put on your body to fight the pathogen.

While I've seen people express concern about "over-vaccination", I've never seen anyone who was concerned about the effect on the immune system of catching too many diseases. That's kind of backwards, if you ask me. But thin, I am an expert.

Caveat: I am talking about a healthy immune system which functions normally. For people with impaired immune systems, even microorganisms that most of us don't notice can cause serious illness.

[Thunder90]

They now want to also add the travel vaccines to the schedule...

[Thunder90]

And Rabies...