Posted on 12/16/2024 3:51:09 PM PST by SmokingJoe
Clear coordinated with Harris Campaign, election interference.
Selzer was clearly paid off to deliberately inflate the Harris figures by a huge amount, which was promptly picked up and amplified by legacy news media.
Great days.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Yup.
Everything in your post is exactly right.
Correct.
Well said, Sam!
I understand, amd he needs to do more of it. But this poll babe is now irrelevant. Go after the msmwhores….
Without exception all the media used the term “ respected pollster...”
Yup.
Including the media in Europe who were totally anti Trump.
If there is evidence that she colluded with the Harris campaign, she is in trouble. If there is no such evidence, even if she was professionally negligent, I doubt she has legal liability. That’s my two cents.
Perhaps it had the opposite effect.
Trump will win and collect against the Des Moines Register and others with deep pockets. Selzer with spill rather than be ruined financially.
FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER-—I HUNG UP ON EVERY POLL.
She’s still pretty cocky and needs to be broken.
The Des Moines Register is the most important newspaper in Iowa—home to key early campaigning in presidential years.
It can make or break candidates in either party.
If there was a hint of corruption with anyone at that newspaper it must be identified and publicly exposed.
No.
Trump is suing a pollster with a good track record for publishing a fake poll to influence an election.
Selzer belongs in prison. That fake poll was an illegal political contribution-in-kind.
“Charlie Kirk encouraged the guys to vote. Last minute endorsement by Joe Rogan gave us the last push we needed to win.”
Selzer was certainly allowed to encourage people to vote and give Harris a last-minute push. But flat-out LYING to push a candidate has consequences, as ABC News just learned, and hopefully this bitch learns too.
BTTT
Bttt
There will be NO Discovery. DMR doesn’t dare take it that far. Trump could easily own a newspaper before this is over.
“clearly” paid off.
That’s a statement of ignorance.
This will get thrown out of court. It was published in the NEWS portion of a newspaper.
Clearly protected by the First Amendment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.