Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge who refuses mental evaluation at age 97 fights suspension
Fox News ^ | 12/11/24 | Michael Dorgan

Posted on 12/12/2024 4:42:59 PM PST by Libloather

Judge Pauline Newman, the oldest federal judge in America at age 97, is continuing to fight against a suspension from the bench by her colleagues who found her mentally not fit enough to serve. Newman is appealing her suspension and has also filed a motion to unseal documents related to an investigation which ultimately led to her being temporarily removed from the bench.

Newman, who was appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1985 to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, was barred from serving in September 2023 for a year by the Federal Circuit's Judicial Council after the panel said she refused to cooperate with an investigation into "reasonable concerns" surrounding her mental fitness. The suspension was extended for another year by the panel in September.

The Committee on Judicial Conduct conducted more than 20 interviews with court staff pointing to her "significant mental deterioration including memory loss, confusion, lack of comprehension, paranoia, anger, hostility and severe agitation," per court documents.

The suspension order also said Newman was slower than her colleagues in issuing opinions and had "amassed a troubling backlog of cases," which her team has said is not accurate.

The Federal Circuit Court on which Newman has served for nearly 40 years deals frequently with patent, intellectual property and copyright cases. Newman is considered a leading intellectual property jurist.

The investigation into Newman led her to file a federal lawsuit against her fellow judges.

U.S. District Judge Christopher R. Cooper, a President Obama appointee, threw out most of Newman’s lawsuit in February, then dismissed the entire case on the pleadings in July, per Law & Crime.

In his 15-page ruling, Cooper rejected the legal challenges Newman had raised to the Judicial Conduct & Disability Act and did not focus on the factual allegations against Newman.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Health/Medicine; History
KEYWORDS: 97yearsold; appealscourt; christopherrcooper; dementia; federal; federalcircuit; federalcircuitappeal; judge; mental; obamajudge; obamascum; obamastooge; paulinenewman; reaganappointee; reaganjudge; ronaldreagan; senility; suspension
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Libloather

Since she is only 6-years older than me, I say “Not guilty”...


21 posted on 12/12/2024 6:51:04 PM PST by SuperLuminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Whatever happened to “Judge not, that ye be not judged?”

Whatever, amazing she’s still fighting to be in the game at 97, and it’s probably keeping her alive.


22 posted on 12/12/2024 7:07:26 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner; CFW; metmom
professor Arthur Hellman of the University of Pittsburgh School of Law noted that senior status judges only hear cases "at the pleasure of the chief judge", and speculated that the prospect of getting no cases could explain why Newman would have rejected going to senior status.

Chief judge Kimberly A. Moore of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is a Dubya judge.

23 posted on 12/12/2024 7:10:32 PM PST by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: metmom

The Constitution says federal judges are appointed for life, so they can serve into their 100s.


24 posted on 12/12/2024 8:21:06 PM PST by xxqqzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

She is far more competent than the current President. Perhaps she can replace Trump in 2028.


25 posted on 12/12/2024 8:49:54 PM PST by TonyM (Score Event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz

There are lots of things they didn’t think through or didn’t expect.


26 posted on 12/12/2024 9:10:48 PM PST by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LibertyOh

Look at Pelosi and Biden.....would you want THOSE GOOD LOOKERS JUDGING YOU?


27 posted on 12/12/2024 11:13:55 PM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz

I agree. It doesn’t seem right for the other judges to remove the one they don’t like.

They should make their argument to Congress.

They can conspire to not let her vote be determinative.

Can they refuse to assign her any cases? Hmm....


28 posted on 12/13/2024 5:42:47 PM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson