Posted on 12/04/2024 8:46:55 PM PST by ransomnote
Last week, we published an article about the project Arla has launched to feed cattle with Bovaer which contains silicon dioxide, propylene glycol and 3-nitrooxypropanol (“3-NOP”). According to the FDA, Bovaer is not a food, it is a drug.
There has been an enormous public backlash with the public boycotting Arla products and Arla’s partners.
There seems to be a lot that is unknown about this new drug being fed to dairy cattle. Considering it is what can only be described as an experiment on both animals and humans, it’s not surprising farmers and the public are outraged.
A farmer posted a quick video on Sunday to thank the public for standing up to Arla.
Peter Sanford on Twitter, 3 December 2024If you would like an indication of which products Arla is potentially contaminating with its drug and so should be avoided, the Daily Mail has helpfully provided a list in its article ‘Full list of Arla Foods’ Bovaer ‘contaminated’ products boycotted by customers: from Lurpak to Cravendale and even Starbucks, as controversial cow feed additive sparks backlash’.
The UK Food Standards Agency is insisting Bovaer is “safe.” A spokesman told MailOnline: “Milk from cows given Bovaer, a feed additive used to reduce methane emissions, is safe to drink.”
On Monday, The Standard said, “On 26 November, Arla announced a new project that it hopes will cut the UK’s methane emissions. Methane is a greenhouse gas and contributes to climate change … The initiative is part of Arla’s wider commitment to reduce the environmental impact of its dairy production. The organisation is aiming to reduce its CO2 emissions by 30 per cent by 2030.”
Using the excuse “to reduce methane emissions” and “CO2 emissions” and then tying it to Agenda 2030’s deadline of 2030, should raise an immediate red flag to anyone who has done even a little research in the last few years.
There is no anthropogenic climate change crisis, and, as we mentioned in our article last week, methane is an important part of the biogenic carbon cycle. As we all know from primary school lessons, carbon dioxide (CO2) is the elixir of life, supporting plants since the world began and making virtually all life on Earth possible.
The whole false anthropogenic climate change narrative should have disintegrated in 2009 when the Climategate emails were released. But such is the determination, and money, of those who want to keep the UN’s agenda alive.
Related: Climategate is the worst scientific scandal of our generation
The Standard also reiterated the claim that Bovaer is safe, even though the outlet conceded that the UK Food Standards Agency said 3-NOP “should be considered corrosive to the eyes, a skin irritant and potentially harmful by inhalation” to humans handling it.
The Standard quoted an animal nutrition specialist at DSM, the first half in DSM-Firmenich which is the manufacturer of Bovaer, as saying “In every case, it [the additive] has proven safe for animal, farmer and consumer.”
How many “cases”? How has Bovaer been proven safe and what testing has been conducted?
It seems The Standard didn’t ask these basic questions. Besides that, the news outlet should know better than to rely solely on a quote from someone whose livelihood depends on the success of Bovaer.
Arla published a statement on Monday that said “Bovaer has undergone extensive testing to ensure it is safe for cows and humans.”
Yes, Arla would say that. Notably, Arla offered no proof to back up their statement. The world has long moved past the “trust me because I said so” stage. Perhaps Arla hasn’t realised that most of the population doesn’t trust the government, regulatory or public bodies, or the large corporations that stand to benefit from the various scams pushed by the controligarchs at the United Nations and the World Economic Forum.
So, has Bovaer “undergone extensive testing to ensure it is safe for cows and humans” as Arla claims?
Table of Contents
MORE AT LINK: https://expose-news.com/2024/12/04/arlas-bovaer-food-additive-is-not-food-it-is-a-drug/
I posted one of the linked articles as a separate thread before posting this thread. It contains the list of UK products made by Arla.Full list of Arla Foods' Bovaer 'contaminated' products boycotted by customers: from Lurpak to Cravendale and even Starbucks, as controversial cow feed additive sparks backlash (United Kingdom)
dailymail.co.uk ^ | 12/4/2024 | EMILY STEARN, SENIOR HEALTH REPORTER and JOHN ELY DEPUTY HEALTH EDITOR FOR MAILONLINEPosted on 12/4/2024, 10:45:17 PM by ransomnote
Bookmark
(Thanks!)
There are warnings on the label (from what I’ve seen) that it may cause infertility (if the label snap is true).
So now they are putting poison into cows to lower their gas output? I guess the gas bag with the tube in the cows ass wasn’t practical. These people are whacked. Leave the cows alone. Take the private jets away from hypocrites like Leo DiCaprio, John Kerry,Bill Gates and the Royals just to name a few.
The combined CO2 emissions from the private jet trips for Leo DiCaprio, John Kerry,Bill Gates and the Royals would easily equal all the cow farts for a year.
Your flight: Boeing 737
From: Seattle (US), SEA to: New York (US), JFK, Roundtrip, Economy Class, ca. 7,800 km, 1 traveller
CO2 amount: 1.3 tons
hot topic
Robin Monotti @X is all over this
Depopulation has always been been the evil goal.
Silicon dioxide is sand, and is used to make food free flowing. Go to the fridge look at that parmesan cheese shaker it will have Silicon dioxide or cellulose likely both as a anticaking agent.
Propylene glycol is a common food additive used to humidity and keep things from freezing. If you drink fireball whiskey you are drinking about 5% by volume PG it is also in a number of other liquors, candy and ice creams.
The last ingredient is the active ingredient it’s an enzyme inhibitor originally from seaweed. It was discovered that this compound stop methane making bacteria from completing the pathway to methane from free fatty acids or acetic acid. Both are what the cow lives off of. Every molecule of methane made by bacteria in a cows stomach is multiple less molecules of FFA or acetic acid which the cow needs for it metabolic energy source. Cows don’t eat grass the bacteria in their four chambered stomachs eat grass and turn it into a soup of bacteria protein, free fatty acids and acetic acid which the cow actually uses for metabolic use. Eliminating the methane is a good thing as it keeps more of the energy in the feed inside the cow where it makes meat, milk and leather rather than venting to the atmosphere. Too much gas in a cows stomach can cause bloat and that can kill cow so.win win. There is not tinfoil qtard quackery it’s not a DNA or RNA nonsense. It’s a simple chemical compound that inhibits a specific enzyme pathway effectively killing methane producing bacteria. It’s genius actually. Here again any energy wasted on methane is not available for the cows use to make meat or milk that’s basic physics too.
3-Nitrooxypropanol = HOCH2CH2CH2ONO2
There is no toxic elements it’s just,hydrogen,carbon and nitrogen.
“It is the mononitrate ester of 1,3-propanediol and acts as an enzyme inhibitor that specifically targets methyl coenzyme M reductase (MCR), the enzyme that catalyzes the final step of methanogenesis in microbes living the digestive system of ruminants, such as cows and sheep.” - wiki
Thank you, sir for a rare chemistry and biology lesson. Unfortunately, the astonishing level of general public ignorance in all matters scientific won’t allow your voice of common sense to be heard. Pitchforks against silicon dioxide - that’s the ticket!
It’s often not the intended function that is the problem, but the unintended consequences that bite you.
In this case however, the intent of reducing methane emissions from cows is complete nonsense.
One unintended consequence (improving the cow’s digestion) may be good.
But what other unintended consequences might there be? The man who confidently tells me there aren’t any only succeeds in making me confident that he doesn’t know.
“But what other unintended consequences might there be? The man who confidently tells me there aren’t any only succeeds in making me confident that he doesn’t know.”
Furthermore, how does man, in his arrogance, think that he can design a more efficient cow than God himself?
I don’t think I will ever get a beef product ever again, at least, anything sold at major food chains.
[[Bovaer is not a food, it is a drug]]
Yeah, but is it any good?
THE COWS ARE BEING PUNISHED-—
GOD MADE THEM THE WAY THEY ARE.
Hence, they will not even concern themselves with the math—unless it’s to count the cash that lines their pockets.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.