Posted on 12/02/2024 3:47:33 PM PST by del griffith
We recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data.
(Excerpt) Read more at dineshdsouza.com ...
During the production of this film, as a supplement to the geolocation data, True the Vote provided my team with ballot drop box surveillance footage that had been obtained through open records requests. We were assured that the surveillance videos had been linked to geolocation cell phone data, such that each video depicted an individual who had made at least 10 visits to drop boxes. Indeed, it is clear from the interviews within the film itself that True the Vote was correlating the videos to geolocation data.
The equivalent of a typographic error doesn't constitute a lie, but the antique gaslight press will pretend it does.
Unfortunately the distributor has disowned the movie.
I wonder what they have on him/her/it?
Conservative Group Salem Media saw the premise of the movie unraveling and washed their hands off it.
It is important to understand the broader context what progressives are doing here.
One item inside of the movie is incorrect. Therefore, the whole thing is incorrect.
Even though 99% of the rest of the work is accurate, yeah, well no. Throw it all away now. This is class-101, this is how progressives operate.
They find a discreditism, turn it into a fulcrum, and they will never ever let it go.
Very rarely does it turn out that progressives are correct that a whole item is actually as they state in comparison to their fulcrum. Progressives live in a bubble.
And what premise would that be besides people illegally dropping off stacks of ballots?
I think it is an excellent film. As I recall, they generally did not claim “proof,” so much as a preponderance of evidence. I think they documented the preponderance of evidence better than anything ever published by the New York Times or Washington Post.
I know that the film and my book create the impression that these individuals were mules that had been identified as suspected ballot harvesters based on their geotracked cell phone data. While all of these individuals’ images were blurred and unrecognizable, one of the individuals has since come forward publicly and has initiated a lawsuit over the use of his blurred image in the film and the book. I owe this individual, Mark Andrews, an apology. I now understand that the surveillance videos used in the film were characterized on the basis of inaccurate information provided to me and my team. If I had known then that the videos were not linked to geolocation data, I would have clarified this and produced and edited the film differently.
I don’t care what the distributor thinks. He could have been scared off.
What I care about is what the producers made. No matter what it still shows people dropping off stacks of balance, over and over. And only ones that went at least 20 times. And it was 2,000 of them.
...ballots...
Just under threat of ruinous litigation that is impossible to win even if you prevail.
Easier just to drop it and issue a statement. But it was real.
The equivalent of a typographic error doesn't constitute a lie, but the antique gaslight press will pretend it does.
Exactly.
I love these threads because FR vote fraud deniers feel safe to come out of the closet on them.
The “True the Vote” movie was a complete fraud.
Doesn’t matter, the truths in the movie are now “fruit of a poisoned tree” and will be discounted and forgotten. Dinesh is an honest guy who is trying to protect his assets, but probably will pay dearly for this.
Not if the tree-poisoners face justice first.
Did you see the movie?
Stupid voice to text, combined with my physical inability to proofread...
Hahaha no kidding, the words were barely out of your mouth and the biggest vote fraud denier on this forum came out of the woodwork.
1. How, and why, was inaccurate data provided to the makers of this movie, and who provided it? (Is criminal fraud at issue?)
2. How much of the case this movie makes is jeopardized by the inaccurate data? If a significant part of the movie still stands despite the inaccurate data, then there remains a case for “widespread vote fraud” despite the repeated claims of such being “baseless” according to the gaslight media.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.