Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

As those who have seen the film or read the book know, “2000 Mules” was based on cell phone geolocation data collected and reviewed by True the Vote. An analysis of this data revealed highly suspicious patterns of certain cell phones, which were recorded in the location of ten or more dropboxes. This data was the premise of the film.

During the production of this film, as a supplement to the geolocation data, True the Vote provided my team with ballot drop box surveillance footage that had been obtained through open records requests. We were assured that the surveillance videos had been linked to geolocation cell phone data, such that each video depicted an individual who had made at least 10 visits to drop boxes. Indeed, it is clear from the interviews within the film itself that True the Vote was correlating the videos to geolocation data.

1 posted on 12/02/2024 3:47:33 PM PST by del griffith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: del griffith
The surveillance videos still show mules illegally dropping off stacks of ballots.

The equivalent of a typographic error doesn't constitute a lie, but the antique gaslight press will pretend it does.

2 posted on 12/02/2024 3:55:46 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: del griffith; Ultra Sonic 007; woodpusher; DiogenesLamp

It is important to understand the broader context what progressives are doing here.

One item inside of the movie is incorrect. Therefore, the whole thing is incorrect.

Even though 99% of the rest of the work is accurate, yeah, well no. Throw it all away now. This is class-101, this is how progressives operate.

They find a discreditism, turn it into a fulcrum, and they will never ever let it go.

Very rarely does it turn out that progressives are correct that a whole item is actually as they state in comparison to their fulcrum. Progressives live in a bubble.


6 posted on 12/02/2024 4:10:48 PM PST by ProgressingAmerica (We cannot vote our way out of these problems. The only way out is to activist our way out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: del griffith

I think it is an excellent film. As I recall, they generally did not claim “proof,” so much as a preponderance of evidence. I think they documented the preponderance of evidence better than anything ever published by the New York Times or Washington Post.


8 posted on 12/02/2024 4:14:25 PM PST by ChessExpert (The Democratic party must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: del griffith
Dinesh is being sued by one of the individuals portrayed in the movie. Hence this clarification statement and apology.

I know that the film and my book create the impression that these individuals were mules that had been identified as suspected ballot harvesters based on their geotracked cell phone data. While all of these individuals’ images were blurred and unrecognizable, one of the individuals has since come forward publicly and has initiated a lawsuit over the use of his blurred image in the film and the book. I owe this individual, Mark Andrews, an apology. I now understand that the surveillance videos used in the film were characterized on the basis of inaccurate information provided to me and my team. If I had known then that the videos were not linked to geolocation data, I would have clarified this and produced and edited the film differently.

9 posted on 12/02/2024 4:29:51 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: del griffith

The “True the Vote” movie was a complete fraud.


14 posted on 12/02/2024 5:08:56 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: del griffith

1. How, and why, was inaccurate data provided to the makers of this movie, and who provided it? (Is criminal fraud at issue?)
2. How much of the case this movie makes is jeopardized by the inaccurate data? If a significant part of the movie still stands despite the inaccurate data, then there remains a case for “widespread vote fraud” despite the repeated claims of such being “baseless” according to the gaslight media.


20 posted on 12/02/2024 7:06:03 PM PST by coloradan (They're not the mainstream media, they're the gaslight media. It's what they do. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod

read


25 posted on 12/03/2024 1:43:56 AM PST by sauropod ("You didn't take a country. You only won a football game!" - Dan Dakich Ne supra crepidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson