Posted on 11/23/2024 3:36:25 AM PST by TigerClaws
ric Abbenante @EricAbbenante There is not a reasonable explanation as to why so many precincts in Boston had over 100% turnout rate.
Edward Coyle @SirEdwardCoyle So, many precincts in the City of #Boston had #voter turnout that exceeded 100% - even up to 263%. If a precinct has 2,366 registered voters and they received 6,244 votes, does that not raise a red flag? I wonder how many times my d*ceased grandparents voted. #bospoli
“vote early and often” taken to its logical conclusion.
Answer/. Democrats invoke the seance rule so the dead can vote.
bttt
I don’t think a single county in MA went red.
I wonder what the source of this information is.
A likely scenario for these ridiculous numbers is that you have thousands of people in large cities who are showing up at the wrong precinct to vote.
Voting records. X post has them.
Not saying MA would go red but nationally need to root out every fake vote as it’d likely flip a dozen Congressional seats our way.
If the RINOs won’t do it, SCOTUS needs to step in and say Constitutionally inappropriate to steal votes in federal elections. Need uniform, national ID system instead of Soros-controlled Secretary of State offices.
It’s been ages since I lived there, but way back when they used to never take anyone off the voter roles (e.g., 8 names for a 1 BR apt), load votes into the voting machines before the polls opened, vote in the name of the no longer living there and didn’t vote after the polls closed, etc.
Of course, it was 100% Dem shenanigans.
Nope. Not how it works.
Good place for Trump DOJ to start.
(Unless you mean intentionally shuffled from polling place to polling place...)
(Unless you mean intentionally shuffled from polling place to polling place...)
Another place to check is Troy and Bowling Green, Ohio. For a number of elections in a row they had a 95% to 110% turnout as I remember. But I do not believe that it was ever investigated.
I wouldn’t count on her doing that. She didn’t hold Washington feet to the fire for anything.
Yeah, that’s probably what it is.
False alarm, no need to look any further.
“There is not a reasonable explanation as to why so many precincts in Boston had over 100% turnout rate.”
I’m pretty sure there is.
“Raises questions” is blatant gaslighting. I don’t care who it is who wrote the piece. It’s idiocy. Denial.
Non statistical voter returns are evidence of ballot tampering. A crime.
Period.
If the left continues to use such language, then the same logic should apply to restrictions on late-term abortions, etc.
These could be local elections — government contracts keep unions and construction businesses going. They could fund the ‘voter turnout effort.’
Here (Missouri) they pay $50 and - I kid you not - a box of fried chicken for votes. They pick up voters in a van or bus and it’s a big party. Sweep the streets and a lot of it happens in the last hours election day as these aren’t the “early riser” voters.
Start with the 90-120% turnout areas. These folks at the lower level would flip facing federal charges. Work up the ladder to the funding.
It comes back to groups likely funded by.... taxpayers.
There are these ‘racism’ lawsuits where DOJ shakes down corporations for BILLIONS of dollars.
That case is then used for get out the vote or flying illegals into the United States. The Riley GA killer guy got flown around the country on taxpayer’s dime after the NGO flew him here in the first place.
Act Blue and all of these Dem groups get money funneled to them by the DOJ which shakes down corporations.
It’s a taxpayer-funded power of the state grifting machine.
The only real way to “Drain the Swamp” is FIRE EVERYONE.
Put them all on probation and make them explain what they do all day, what the purpose of their organization is and just start pulling weeds. 80-90% likely need to go as they’re doing nothing or just on the grift.
Look for “the stall.” Lawsuits, run out the clock, impeachments.
Stall out the 4 years and hope to get another Dem back in power. That’s why no real change happens with our elections. The people running the show won’t allow elections to interfere with their plans.
...that doesn’t “raise questions”.
That ANSWERS a few questions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.