Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Astonishing moment Putin’s ICBM pierces through the sky during Ukraine onslaught
Metro UK ^ | 11/21/2024 | Gergana Krasteva

Posted on 11/21/2024 4:44:29 AM PST by marcusmaximus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
MIRVs caught on video.
1 posted on 11/21/2024 4:44:29 AM PST by marcusmaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

Pretty sure those are launches played in reverse, not impacts of incoming rockets.


2 posted on 11/21/2024 4:45:40 AM PST by DocRock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DocRock

I noticed the same thing....no explosions on impast.


3 posted on 11/21/2024 4:47:51 AM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DocRock

Please don’t be a schizo.
They are clearly impacts, watch the fire. And I’ve seen this video with a timestamp elsewhere.


4 posted on 11/21/2024 4:48:19 AM PST by Crazieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wny

Dummy warheads, entirely kinetic.


5 posted on 11/21/2024 4:50:21 AM PST by Crazieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DocRock

My first thoughts as well. No boom boom.


6 posted on 11/21/2024 4:50:54 AM PST by Mathews (I have faith Malachi is right!!! Any day now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus
Putin is getting desperate.

He both fears and welcomes a Trumpian solution to the war.

This is positioning for negotiations.

7 posted on 11/21/2024 4:59:00 AM PST by marktwain (The Republic is at risk. Resistance to the Democratic Party is Resistance to Tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus
From the article:
Pavel Podvig, director of the Russian Nuclear Forces Project, stressed that this kind of a strike ‘might have a value as a signal’.

He wrote in a thread on X that one must be ‘skeptical and cautious’ about the claims, adding: ‘Regarding the “intercontinental” claim, the distance from Kapustin Yar to Dnipro is about 800 km. It is not an intercontinental range.’

He added later: ‘Using these kinds of missiles, whether RS-26 or a true ICBM, in a conventional role does not make a lot of sense because of their relatively low accuracy and high cost. But this kind of a strike might have a value as a signal.’


8 posted on 11/21/2024 5:00:13 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman
"Please don’t be a schizo. They are clearly impacts, watch the fire. And I’ve seen this video with a timestamp elsewhere."

There are numerous reports RS-26 were used which simple searches show a max speed of Mach 20. This video is all over the interwebs in the last few hours and it looks like edited launches in reverse, not Mach-20 inbounds. I live close to the Cape and watch a lot of launches. I was close enough to the SpaceX launch on Monday that I felt it. Low ceiling gave the exact appearance on that launch as this video in reverse and sped up.

What's a shizo?
9 posted on 11/21/2024 5:01:38 AM PST by DocRock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


"VIVA KAMALA & NANZI!"


"SLAVA UKRAINI!"


"LONG LIVE ZELVIS & FJB!"

10 posted on 11/21/2024 5:03:06 AM PST by Who is John Galt? ("...mit Pulver und Blei, Die Gedanken sind frei!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7X89a531CY

Go watch the real thing.

11 posted on 11/21/2024 5:06:35 AM PST by BlackbirdSST (Trump or Bust! Long live the Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

I understand these missles have four harheads each. I counted six clusters of four.
More like six missles..


12 posted on 11/21/2024 5:15:00 AM PST by READINABLUESTATE (‘Never trust a man whose uncle was eaten by cannibals’)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackbirdSST

Watch the metro.uk video again. The car on the left is going the correct way.
It is not reversed.
Please stop making FR look bad.


13 posted on 11/21/2024 5:19:00 AM PST by Crazieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: READINABLUESTATE

https://metro.co.uk/2024/11/21/vengeful-putin-unleashes-intercontinental-ballistic-missile-ukraine-first-time-22036043/amp/


14 posted on 11/21/2024 5:23:13 AM PST by READINABLUESTATE (‘Never trust a man whose uncle was eaten by cannibals’)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: READINABLUESTATE

Seems like a waste of a ICBM.

Or just using up old inventory.


15 posted on 11/21/2024 5:24:25 AM PST by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: READINABLUESTATE

MIRVs do not come in at the same time. They can be released independently.


16 posted on 11/21/2024 5:27:59 AM PST by CodeToad (Rule #1: The elites want you dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

good


17 posted on 11/21/2024 5:29:35 AM PST by dp0622 (Tried a coup, a fake tax story, tramp slander, Russia nonsense, impeachment and a virus. They lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman
Please stop making FR look bad.

Give it a rest. I make FR 'look bad' after watching 1000 days of propaganda spam bots run through here like they own the place. That's crazie man.

18 posted on 11/21/2024 5:33:48 AM PST by BlackbirdSST (Trump or Bust! Long live the Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: riverrunner

If it was an RS-26, here’s what ChatGPT has to say about that one:

The RS-26 Rubezh is a relatively modern Russian intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), so it would not be considered “old inventory.” It is designed as a part of Russia’s strategic nuclear deterrent and is seen as a successor or complement to older systems like the RS-24 Yars. The RS-26 Rubezh, which is based on the Yars platform, was first publicly unveiled in 2014 and is a solid-fuel missile intended to be more mobile and potentially more difficult to intercept than its predecessors.

The missile has been described as having a range of up to 4,000 kilometers, though its precise capabilities and deployment status are somewhat shrouded in secrecy, and much of the public information about it has been limited. It’s not widely deployed or in large numbers, so it might be considered a newer asset within Russia’s strategic forces rather than part of any “old inventory.”

In general, Russia has been modernizing its nuclear forces, and the RS-26 fits into that strategy, alongside other new systems like the Sarmat ICBM and new submarine-launched ballistic missiles. Therefore, while not the newest system in Russia’s arsenal, the RS-26 is still part of an active and modern inventory rather than being considered outdated or old stock.


19 posted on 11/21/2024 5:38:05 AM PST by FreedomForce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

Fourth word in the article — “allegedly.”


20 posted on 11/21/2024 5:41:58 AM PST by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson