To: E. Pluribus Unum
utterly stupid and useless article written by an utterly stupid person.
2 posted on
11/20/2024 10:57:26 AM PST by
ABStrauss
(I miss Rush!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Stocking Stuffer suggestion for all NYTs Employees, Owners and Shareholders:

3 posted on
11/20/2024 10:59:28 AM PST by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“he New York Times” - didn’t have to read another word to know it’s complete and worthless garbage!
5 posted on
11/20/2024 11:01:32 AM PST by
Brandonmark
(November 5, 2024 - A New Day in America!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
'Teddy' is going to need the 55 gallon drum size, LOL!

6 posted on
11/20/2024 11:02:47 AM PST by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“Right-wing” just like me!
7 posted on
11/20/2024 11:03:17 AM PST by
ChessExpert
(The Democratic party must be destroyed.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockbridge_Network
Purpose
The group describes itself as a “political venture capital firm.”[2]
The Rockbridge Network aims to influence U.S. politics by supporting right-wing media, voter turnout efforts, and election polling.
Donors
The group is backed by Silicon Valley figures, including some without a history of political giving. Other funds come from traditional Republican donors looking for new innovative organizations to give to.[1] Major donors include Peter Thiel and Rebekah Mercer.[6] Vance and Thiel have a long history of working together with Thiel backing many of Vance’s commercial and political ventures.[7] As of 2023, the group had approximately 125 members.[5]
9 posted on
11/20/2024 11:07:39 AM PST by
PeterPrinciple
(Thinking Caps are not longer being issued, but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It’s interesting to see a group of people disparaged for doing exactly what the previous group of people were applauded for.
10 posted on
11/20/2024 11:22:58 AM PST by
webheart
To: E. Pluribus Unum
New York Times is going balls out to try to affect Trump’s administration.
11 posted on
11/20/2024 11:24:17 AM PST by
webheart
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Future reference for RICO++ that will be signed into law next time Democrats have control.
12 posted on
11/20/2024 11:25:04 AM PST by
Steely Tom
([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
To: E. Pluribus Unum
| The Winklevoss twins
I think I remember them from the old Dick Tracy comics.
14 posted on
11/20/2024 11:30:34 AM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
This is GREAT! Maybe they can flush the sewers known as congress and government “public servants”.
18 posted on
11/20/2024 11:59:08 AM PST by
hal ogen
(Freedom of Speech or Reeducation Camp)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The NYT has their stalkers following Trump and Elon.
I DO believe stalker laws protect both celebrities and politicians.
20 posted on
11/20/2024 12:08:27 PM PST by
Zathras
To: E. Pluribus Unum
How was it a secretive meeting if a Times reporter was there?
23 posted on
11/20/2024 1:49:08 PM PST by
popdonnelly
(All the enormous crimes in history have been committed by governments.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson