Fleur Anderson
"Feminism was established to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream."
Rush Limbaugh
Fleur Anderson
"Feminism was established to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream."
Rush Limbaugh
Goodnes gracious, people are still inviting this old gassy had to speak? She about to enter Dependz aisle at Wal Mart. Who would listen to this relic from the 90s?
So ... Kamala lost because Trump is prettier?
Junk sociology.
Margaret Thatcher could have been elected USA President in 1988 and 1992.
I am however greatly opposed to socialist women being president.
Heard Rush say that many times. He’s right. Hillary is full of crap. No one can tell me that if Tater Swuft had run for president she wouldn’t have won. Geez. Hillary! Get a life.
Many will vote for an American Margart Thatcher. As a woman, I am embarrassed that the women who received a major party nomination are women who rose to power on the basis of a man: Bill Clinton and Willy Brown. Americans will vote for a politician who is a female, but not a female politician.
I don’t give a damn what’s between a candidate’s legs. I care deeply about what’s between their ears. And oatmeal will not get the job from me.
......there is still a mindset in our country certainly about what a president looks like....
Balderdash!
hillary lost because of her arrogance (”deplorables”, etc.)!
kamala lost because of her stupidity!
Whatever. I don't care and will never care if a woman or black or anything is in that office. I only care about leading this country correctly ... and those two broads were not it, especially Kamala. What a train wreck.
Neither woman who has run for president in the general election got to that point through a fair primary. Hillary got it through the shenanigans of DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the super delegates, effectively shutting out Bernie Sanders, who would probably have won in a fair primary. And Kamala was simply anointed without having to face the voters in any primary campaign. Democrats talk about democracy but make a mockery of it during their primaries, if they even bother having one. Barak Obama was the last candidate to win a Democrat primary fair and square as a nonincumbent.
Well, maybe they should. In some cases, anyway.
That’s some scary stuff right there.
They shouldn’t look shitfaced at 10 am.
Women on the Left are ugly-looking because they are ugly (hateful, hostile, angry) on the inside.
Plenty of good qualified women that could be president, but Harris wasn’t one of them and neither was Hillary
If the donkeys wanted a female that could actually win a presidential election, they shouldn’t have run Tulsi Gabbard out of the party. But they are welcome to continue to nominate harridans and incompetents so that they can bitch about “glass ceilings” and make themselves feel superior.
If American politics rejects ugly women, how do you explain Lindsey Graham?
DEI is the very essence of the dominance of appearances for democrats.
Appearances is all that the liberal elite cares about, which accounts for the democrats’ election disaster on November 5th.
Appearances is their defining obsession.
No, Hillary. Neither you nor Kamalamadingdong are likeable people. You both come off as shrill, arrogant, ugly in spirit and vindictive. Kamala has the added trait of blatant stupidity.
Likability is an important factor in elections, like it or not. Especially for women, fair or not.
You fail miserably when it comes to likability, Hillary. So does Kamala.
Perhaps if the D’s ran an honest, loyal, not- corrupt, and competent woman they’d have more success. Pick a pretty one or an ugly one, almost nobody cares what politicians look like. All hilLIARy’s doing is making up more excuses for her losing her election.