Posted on 10/16/2024 4:02:43 AM PDT by MtnClimber
Whether because of malice or ignorance, they are compromising our elections and exposing themselves to potential criminal and civil liability.
Research published on GodsFiveStones.com has uncovered secret cryptographic algorithms in the official voter registration databases of New York, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Unreported findings indicate similar algorithms exist in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Texas. Despite this, Secretaries of State across these jurisdictions are reluctant to acknowledge or address the issue. While Ohio’s Secretary of State agreed to investigate our claims, no official corrective action has been announced.
Our investigation into New York’s voter registration database revealed well-hidden algorithms potentially violating several state and federal laws. This cryptographic scheme is a dual-use technology: while it might have legitimate applications, it can also be used to satisfy malicious objectives. We believe one such nefarious use could be to facilitate mail-in ballot election fraud. In disclosing the existence of the algorithm in the New York State Board of Elections voter registration database, we stressed the following:
The algorithmic sort order creates the appearance of compliance with public disclosure laws while concealing attribute information. The attribute information is uniquely available to keyholders, much as a card cheat has unique access to a straight flush. Concealing information in plain sight, as was done in New York’s voter rolls, is called ‘steganography’ (Kaur & Rani 2016). In combination with known fraudulent registration records, The Spiral algorithm presents the possibility that it has been inserted into voter roll software, or used to alter the NYSBOE voter roll database, for nefarious reasons. The Spiral can be used to identify fraudulent records quickly and covertly by repositioning records into key positions. Records of interest can then be extracted by software designed to recognize the algorithmically modified data structure.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
How many different ways is vote fraud happening? It seems like numerous tactics are being used and everyone knows which party benefits.
Federal District Court Judge Weaponized Secret Algorithms
to Stop Election Fraud Hidden in State Voter Rolls
American Thinker ^ | 10/15/2024 | Jerome Corsi
Posted on 10/15/2024, 7:02:57 AM by SeekAndFind
On September 27, 2024, Federal District Court Judge Michael T. Liburdi rendered a decision in American Encore v. Adrian Fontes that weaponized algorithms surreptitiously embedded in various state boards of elections official voter registration database, turning them into a tool to block elections that bear the modus operandi of mail-in ballot election fraud from being certified.
In his decision, Judge Liburdi referenced a provision in the Elections Procedures Manual (EPM) that Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, a Democrat, had issued. That provision required the Secretary of State to certify an election by excluding the votes of any county that refused to certify an election. Justice Liburdi quoted the EPM language that became known in Arizona as the “Canvass Provision.” The quoted EPM language, including the parenthetical remark included in the original EPM document, reads as follows:
If the official canvass of any county has not been received by this deadline, the Secretary of State may proceed with the state canvass without including the votes of the missing county (i.e., the Secretary of State is not permitted to use an unofficial vote count in lieu of the county’s official canvass).
Judge Liburdi characterized the rule as “probably unprecedented in the history of the United States” because it “gives the Secretary of State nearly carte blanche authority to disenfranchise the ballots of potentially millions of Americans.”
Judge Liburdi’s ruling is a bulwark against secret algorithms in the state voter databases that create a pool of hidden “non-existent voters.” Beyond just creating “non-existent voters,” the cryptographic algorithms assign legitimate state voter IDs to the “non-existent voters.” This last step enables the criminal perpetrators to vote these “non-existent voters” as apparently “legal” mail-in votes in what could be sufficient quantities to steal otherwise losing elections.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Once I understand a word of this, I have the feeling I’m going to be outraged!
If anyone get the chance to put this into a few English sentences, thank you ahead of time :)
voter fraud by the numbers.
In 2012, Mass Gov. Deval Patrick was trying to round up votes.
<><>He sent out voter-registration apps to everyone getting food stamps.
<><>10% of the letters to the welfare list came back as “undeliverable”
<><>the welfare money was likely going out to “non-existent people.”
<><>meaning 10% was fraudulent——but “someone” was pocketing the money.
And voting.
Nothing says “success” like having a 34.6% increase in
the number of food-stamp recipients – in a mere 14 months
How many Democrats are getting “elected”......and getting a cut?
I’d come out of retirement and work for free on this stuff. I love big datasets. So much so that I’d pay them to let me in on the action.
Congress allocated $90 million tax dollars to the US Postal Service ......that we know of......to compensate them for services rendered to voters living abroad. Citizens living overseas, including members of the armed forces, are allowed by law to vote absentee in elections. In Montana, a functioning absentee system allows them to vote starting 45 days until Election Day.
Democrat voter fraud is in high gear.......globally.
Backstory: Pres Reagan signed into law the 1986 Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA): <><>to protect a time-honored tradition of overseas voting <><>to enhance US citizens abroad and U.S. military members’ right to vote <><>yet, federal law doesn’t provide clear, commonsense rules <><>for how overseas voters register to vote <><>or how their votes are compiled and counted. <><>ergo, states can make their own laws — even bad ones.
But this past August, we learned that Democrats have gone global, committing $300,000 to register and influence 9 million overseas voters — even though the federal government says only 2.4 million legal voters live in other countries. That’s 6.4 million votes that Democrats want to find, that don’t exist. The group financing the efforts——Democrats Abroad—— told CBS News that the ballots are “likely to favor Kamala Harris.”
Contact the RNC 310 1st St SE Washington, DC 20003 (202) 863-8500
.
On September 27, 2024, Federal District Court Judge Michael T. Liburdi rendered a decision in American Encore v. Adrian Fontes that weaponized algorithms surreptitiously embedded in various state boards of elections official voter registration database, turning them into a tool to block elections that bear the modus operandi of mail-in ballot election fraud from being certified.
This is NOT a sentence.
Michael T. Liburdi rendered a decision in American Encore v. Adrian Fontes
"The Judge said..."
that weaponized algorithms surreptitiously embedded in various state boards of elections official voter registration database
"that the alogorithms"
turning them into a tool to block elections that bear the modus operandi of mail-in ballot election fraud from being certified
"turning them into a tool for bad stuff"
"The judge said that the algorithms turning them into a tool for bad stuff"
Corsi is a loon and I wish he would go away so that serious people could look into voter fraud.
I was wondering what “new” form of voter fraud the RAT party would use to steal THIS election. The Repubs are always at least 1 (and probably a dozen) steps behind the evil villains obsessed with power.
These are all stop-gap measures until they can get ranked-choice voting installed everywhere.
“ secret cryptographic algorithms in the official voter registration databases ”
Yikes!
I think they omitted an “are” between “algorithms” and “surreptitiously”. Having said that, I still can’t make much sense of the article.
If Kamala is installed like BeijingBiden was, there will be no consequences for any election corruption.
The US Army has just had its standing orders changed so that if any local “authority” says it needs physical help the soldiers already have the “shoot to kill” orders in place.
This could be a very violent time unless the election is a slam dunk.
An article that's not too technical, which contains the video link, and also discusses the original peer-reviewed article by Andrew Paquette, Ph.D., in the Journal of Information Warfare, JIW.
https://www.uncoverdc.com/2023/05/25/catastrophic-loss-of-control-data-breach-in-ny-elections/
In the article, Andrew Paquette is referred to as the Director of Research for the New York Citizens Audit (NYCA). In the video, Dr. Art Zark is referred to as the same.
The video gets a little technical at around 24:00, when Dr. Zark gives an overview of the specific algorithms. He manages to still inject explanations that an average person can understand. At around 39:00 he finishes his portion and the video goes back to Ms. Hornik.
A real eye opener. These people have done a massive amount of work. This is not just a New York state problem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.