Moderator in upcoming Vance-Walz debate is linked to Lincoln Project

American Thinker ^ | 29 Sep, 2024 | Monica Showalter

[Phlyer]

As far as Vance not showing up, that would be a stupid thing to do.

Yes, at this point. The mistake was agreeing to debate with leftist shill "moderators". This is not fully controlled by the Trump campaign. The GOPe will sabotage him at every opportunity.

This should be a Trump-style negotiation. "I propose as moderators Tucker Carlson and Jesse Watters." That would actually be a good debate because both of them have enough confidence in the conservative positions that they would let the Marxist candidate hang himself with his own idiocy.

But at least, if there were some sort of compromise, it might include moderators who feel they need to appear to be fair - as was done in this Trump/Biden debate. Of course, they wanted Biden to hang himself, so they allowed a fair debate.

If Trump proposed conservative moderators, perhaps the compromise would be no moderators at all (as another posting suggested). Of course, the Dhimm candidate would monopolize the time and if the Republican candidate waited politely for the rants to end, he would never get a chance to speak at all. So perhaps there needs to be a simple timekeeper who is not allows to say a word - just light up a signal that the time for one speaker was drawing to a close, then cut off his/her microphone and activate the other.

It will never happen because the GOPe likes to lose, but one can dream.

[forYourChildrenVote4Bush]

I’ve said it many many many many times

Republican nominees must be the stupidest since bush. Every nominee whether they be bush , McCain , Romney and even trump should know by now that almost all media is against any and every republican

The left media will try to talk great about the Republican nominee they think has the better chance of being beaten during the presidential race. Meaning , the media will try nominating the weakest republican to the gop nomination

In any case the republicans should never accept a debate on cnn abc cbs msnbc

Never

[kiryandil]

Face the Manipulation host Margaret Brennan...

[Mr. N. Wolfe]

Every once in a while, a customer will enter a casino and win the jackpot but in the end, the casino always wins. The customer is addicted to gambling and keeps coming back. They know the game is rigged but they can’t help themselves. There’s also no consideration for the people who care about them.

That’s how I see these debates.

The Republican party needs an intervention.

[Sacajaweau]

Walz is a coach not a speaker. JD is gonna clobber him.

[WHATNEXT?]

Walz wasn’t a coach in China. He will get some dirty zingers in. But, Vance will hit them out of the ball park.

[dadfly]

i don’t get it. Trump’s not debating so why is Vance?

Lincoln/Douglas format or nothing.

[x]

That was part of the original 3 debate deal made between Biden and Trump. Trump had 2 debates, one against Biden and one against Harris, and now — according to the orginal deal — it’s the VP candidates’ turn.

[flamberge]

There should be no upcoming "debate" between Vance and Walz.

These events are Democrat stage shows. They are not debates. Republicans should refuse to attend them.

[JesusIsLord]

Why do republican candidates continue to agree to debates and interviews with moderators and networks who hate them? I don't get it ???

[Red6]

Question posed: “Is there no one in the mainstream media without a conflict of interest that somehow always favors Kamala Harris? “

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DltAmnOVAAAUSKx.jpg That includes those that are more libertarian as conservative. This hardly is inclusive and that creates a more balanced image which isn’t real. Yet this still shows how the left is favored.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/46a507_e2098446fbd3484a93e2a0ff3c3c4abe~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_2394,h_1634,al_c,q_90/46a507_e2098446fbd3484a93e2a0ff3c3c4abe~mv2.webp 36% are outright Democrats and only 3.4% Republicans. But that does not mean that the 51% non-party affiliated are neutral. In polls, depending on the race, as much as 80% of journalists vote Democrat.

To answer your question, it’s difficult because most the MSM is biased for the left, and most journalists are not professional enough to keep their personal bias from showing. Maybe these journalists simply do not care because they pander to a certain reader/viewer and these people want to hear that - affirmation. Many people are not looking for the truth, they seek affirmation for what they believe.

If these folks were at least professional, truly attempting to stay unbiased and objective, we could get something that resembles a fair debate even if they have personal views that favor one candidate. But don’t hold your breath.

[cowboyusa]

Vance is auditioning for 2028, and he knows it.

[Ann Archy]

The LINCOLN Project........LINCOLN WAS ASSASSINATED!! Was THAT WHY THEY NAMED THIS GROUP OR WAS IT BECAUSE OF GAY LOVERS AND PEDOS?

[MNnice]

JD Vance eats Margaret Brennan’s lunch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAd24se85L4