Posted on 09/29/2024 11:18:19 AM PDT by Red Badger
Recent research attributes the sharp increase in global methane emissions between 2020 and 2022 to greater inundation in tropical wetlands and a decline in hydroxide in the atmosphere.
Analysis of satellite data revealed that heavy rains, likely linked to La Niña conditions, amplified methane production in wetlands by enhancing anaerobic microbial activities. These findings underscore the significance of understanding wetland dynamics to address methane’s impact on climate change.
Recent satellite data analysis reveals that the record surge in atmospheric methane emissions between 2020 and 2022 was primarily caused by more extensive inundation and water storage in wetlands, alongside a minor reduction in atmospheric hydroxide (OH). These findings are crucial for strategies aimed at reducing atmospheric methane and lessening its effect on climate change.
Pandemic Impact and Theoretical Explanations
“From 2010 to 2019, we saw regular increases – with slight accelerations – in atmospheric methane concentrations, but the increases that occurred from 2020 to 2022 and overlapped with the COVID-19 shutdown were significantly higher,” says Zhen Qu, assistant professor of marine, earth and atmospheric sciences at North Carolina State University and lead author of the research. “Global methane emissions increased from about 499 teragrams (Tg) to 550 Tg during the period from 2010 to 2019, followed by a surge to 570 – 590 Tg between 2020 and 2022.”
Atmospheric methane emissions are given by their mass in teragrams. One teragram equals about 1.1 million U.S. tons.
One of the leading theories concerning the sudden atmospheric methane surge was the decrease in manmade air pollution from automobiles and industry during the pandemic shutdown of 2020 and 2021. Air pollution contributes hydroxyl radicals (OH) to the lower atmosphere. In turn, atmospheric OH interacts with other gases, such as methane, to break them down.
“The prevailing idea was that the pandemic reduced the amount of OH concentration, therefore there was less OH available in the atmosphere to react with and remove methane,” Qu says.
Research Methodology and Findings
To test the theory, Qu and a team of researchers from the U.S., U.K., and Germany looked at global satellite emissions data and atmospheric simulations for both methane and OH during the period from 2010 to 2019 and compared it to the same data from 2020 to 2022 to tease out the source of the surge.
Using data from satellite readings of atmospheric composition and chemical transport models, the researchers created a model that allowed them to determine both amounts and sources of methane and OH for both time periods.
They found that most of the 2020 to 2022 methane surge was a result of inundation events – or flooding events – in equatorial Asia and Africa, which accounted for 43% and 30% of the additional atmospheric methane, respectively. While OH levels did decrease during the period, this decrease only accounted for 28% of the surge.
Implications of Methane Surge on Climate
“The heavy precipitation in these wetland and rice cultivation regions is likely associated with the La Niña conditions from 2020 to early 2023,” Qu says. “Microbes in wetlands produce methane as they metabolize and break down organic matter anaerobically, or without oxygen. More water storage in wetlands means more anaerobic microbial activity and more release of methane to the atmosphere.”
The researchers feel that a better understanding of wetland emissions is important to developing plans for mitigation.
“Our findings point to the wet tropics as the driving force behind increased methane concentrations since 2010,” Qu says. “Improved observations of wetland methane emissions and how methane production responds to precipitation changes are key to understanding the role of precipitation patterns on tropical wetland ecosystems.”
The research was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Reference:
“Inverse modeling of 2010–2022 satellite observations shows that inundation of the wet tropics drove the 2020–2022 methane surge” by Zhen Qu, Daniel J. Jacob, A. Anthony Bloom, John R. Worden, Robert J. Parker and Hartmut Boesch, 24 September 2024, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2402730121
The research was supported in part by NASA Early Career Investigator Program under grant 80NSSC24K1049. Qu is the corresponding author and began the research while a postdoctoral researcher at Harvard University. Daniel Jacob of Harvard; Anthony Bloom and John Worden of the California Institute of Technology’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory; Robert Parker of the University of Leicester, U.K.; and Hartmut Boesch of the University of Bremen, Germany, also contributed to the work.
The story about the eating nothing but eggs for a month and his cholesterol went down . Then wine is bad for you then good for you then bad for you then good for you ,LOL
Jokes aside, the Hunga Tonga–Hunga Haʻapai eruption effects are little addressed.
When all that water vapor gets into the lower atmosphere, things should start to change and they’ll have to invent new BS to cover for its effects (which will contradict their ‘models’).
I believe that we’ve begun to see some regional effects already.
My money is on Mexican restaurant curbside takeout food.
Any headline beginning with ‘Scientists’ is guaranteed to be state approved propaganda.
... or “Experts...”
BFD. There is such a thing as too much information and we are there. A little bit of learning is a dangerous thing some times.
With no connection to Covid at all.
This means that we should be able to cure Global Warming by draining wetlands!
😁...........................
So, nothing to do with mans activities.
“These people have absolutely no idea what they’re doing.”
Coincidentally we never had any environmental problems involving microscopic concentrations of chemicals no one ever heard of, until NASA put up a bunch of satellites to have something to do with their 20 billion budget. The easiest solution to “globull warming” is get rid of NASA. Somehow 15 generations of Americans did quite well without them.
I remember an old cartoon of an aircraft flying low over the jungle. Natives point at it and the chief declares...”Swamp Gas!”
IIRC, methane breaks down fairly quickly.............
Hillary Clinton was the source?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.