Posted on 09/27/2024 5:25:39 AM PDT by Lockbox
How did Vice President Kamala Harris get to where she is?
She literally slept (being nice) with a married man to get in the political game!
This just begs the question. Why do women support Kamala?
Is this the method other women used to get ahead?
Do they want their daughters to also be forced to use this method to advance?
Do women what men to assume that they slept their way to the position they hold, since they support a candidate who used that method?
Since the libs paint Trump as a Nazi and all his supporters as Nazi supporters, it makes sense that since Kamala slept her way to the VP job, all her supporters also support and use that method.
Way too easy... Affirmative action and kneepads... Everybody know that.
Even those Dems who say they support her, but won’t get off their rear-ends to vote for her on election day.
I think that is the mistake the Libs made, screwed up the economy too fast. The pocket book issue is always number 1 with voters. With ever one in America feeling the actions of this (Obama # 2) presidency then there is a good chance the Libs loose.
Good point. Destroy morals, then everything is much easier…
But near the top is much better then at the bottom….
I don’t think that was what she pulled 🤣🤣🤣
According to the glowing biographical ads blanketing the airwaves nationwide: Through hard work, dedication, and accomplishment. With zero - zero - response from Trump on many of these media outlets. No ads highlighting Trump’s accomplishments, none to combat this rosy picture of who Harris is. And people act bewildered as to why the race is close. Harris and her allies are actually running an aggressive campaign to win...our side is not.
The Peter Principle is a theory that explains why many companies have seemingly ineffective management staff. It states that rather than promoting people to the roles they are best suited for, companies tend to reward successful employees with roles for which they are not qualified. According to this principle, individuals are promoted until they reach their level of incompetence, at which point they remain in that job.
This is why the election is closer than it should be. A huge percentage of the women will vote for the female on the ballot no matter what.
As a man, I don't have a particular problem with a woman becoming president. It's just that the two we have put up so far on a national ticket (Hillary and Kamala) are just so awful. If the GOP nominee was say, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, I would be okay with voting for her.
I first read the Peter Principle about 50 years ago,and it is still true.
yep, just not that woman!
I suspect where you and I differ then is specifically on the point of how constructive it is to point this prostitution-like behavior in the context of changing the minds of some undecided female voters.
In my opinion, it isn’t worth the effort to pander to women (I do believe it is pandering) who cannot understand that groceries now take up 25% more of the grocery budget than they did four years ago, and the woman running for the office is a part of the core team that drove up prices.
We will disagree on this.
Yeah, she’s a blithering idiot. But her father was a Jamaican economist who landed at Stanford? Can anyone spell C-I-A?
So who’s to say her first job wasn’t as a honeypot for leverage on Willie for one or more of our, or anther’s, alphabet agencies?
No question. Many women see it as more double standards about women and sex. It is presumed that most male pols have multiple affairs along the way, but a woman isn’t allowed one?
Does a Duck and a June bug mean anything to ya.
All I know about is the what was seen as the glamorous affair with the most powerful man in California.
They had a real affair, of celebrity events, tuxes and formal dresses, and fancy restaurants, this was not Monica Lewinski servicing Clinton and neither one of them ever even taking off their clothes while the underling performed a function on him at his office.
When they get to old to flirt and their sugar daddies have retired, sometimes they clean up their act.
We obviously see it differently. When I look at it, I don’t see a glitzy or glamorous red carpet thing, I see a corrupt, grasping woman servicing a powerful, corrupt married man, and then getting two six figure jobs out of it on the taxpayer dime.
Which is all true, but is was also what I wrote, most of these guys keep describing the Monica Lewinski situation but in the end I think female voters in general aren’t interested in this old tale of a slutty 20 something dating the most powerful man in California and dining and dancing with the rich and glamorous and powerful people of Hollywood and California.
Stella Dallas
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.