I suspect where you and I differ then is specifically on the point of how constructive it is to point this prostitution-like behavior in the context of changing the minds of some undecided female voters.
In my opinion, it isn’t worth the effort to pander to women (I do believe it is pandering) who cannot understand that groceries now take up 25% more of the grocery budget than they did four years ago, and the woman running for the office is a part of the core team that drove up prices.
We will disagree on this.
All I know about is the what was seen as the glamorous affair with the most powerful man in California.
They had a real affair, of celebrity events, tuxes and formal dresses, and fancy restaurants, this was not Monica Lewinski servicing Clinton and neither one of them ever even taking off their clothes while the underling performed a function on him at his office.