Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Heat-based batteries are a surprisingly versatile tool
www.canarymedia.com ^ | 26 August 2024 | Jeff St. John

Posted on 08/29/2024 12:25:26 AM PDT by Jonty30

Brenmiller Energy’s boxes of hot rocks are being deployed to turn electricity into steam heat, boost campus heat-and-power systems, and make power plants more efficient.

Doron Brenmiller, co-founder of Brenmiller Energy, knows all about the useful things hot rocks can do.

Over the past 12 years, the Israel-based manufacturer of thermal energy storage systems has evolved from producing heat batteries for a specific purpose — solar-thermal power plants — to heat batteries for a much wider range of applications.

Brenmiller Energy’s bGen systems, which use crushed rock as an energy-storage medium, are now being deployed to turn cheap electricity into heat for hospitals and food and beverage processing plants. They’re boosting the efficiency of cogeneration plants that produce electricity and heat at college campus buildings. And they’re being installed to store excess heat from the steam driving fossil-gas-fired power plants to help them more efficiently balance the ups and downs of increasingly renewable-powered grids.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Education; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: energystorage
97% efficiency.

That's a very good efficiency, I believe. I'm not certain of the limitations of this technology, but it anything that doesn't use lithium-ion is very good.

For me, this is where renewables are useful, as passive energy generators for storing energy and not for immediate energy use.

1 posted on 08/29/2024 12:25:26 AM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Rondo [USA] heat battery
https://rondo.com/how-it-works


2 posted on 08/29/2024 1:19:05 AM PDT by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linMcHlp

Nothing is 100% efficiency, but if it can get to the high 90%, that’s awesome.

This is something that you could build for your farm or house to keep the barn or house warm instead of the grid.


3 posted on 08/29/2024 1:22:49 AM PDT by Jonty30 (Genghis Khan did not have the most descendants. His father had more. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: linMcHlp

From the website:

RHB100

Storage: 100 MWh

Discharge: 7 MWt

Charge: Up to 20MWac

Heat Delivered: Continuously 24/7

Emissions: Zero

Not exactly sized for farm or house ...
From the description, maybe possible to heat tons of bricks for a large farm?


4 posted on 08/29/2024 2:49:24 AM PDT by Adder (End fascism...defeat all Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

This is something that you could build for your farm or house to keep the barn or house warm instead of the grid.
____________________________
The soapstone lined wood heaters have for decades recognized the value of capturing high heat output to later release it to provide a more uniform and steady supply of heat in the home.
https://fireandsaw.com/best-soapstone-wood-stoves/


5 posted on 08/29/2024 3:35:04 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Adder

Agreed. Even though the headline says “batteries” and the units in the article are of electrical power, not heat energy, the applications of the device seemed more for later providing heat instead of later providing electricity.


6 posted on 08/29/2024 3:35:06 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Adder

Or buy the same rocks this company uses, if they are more efficient than bricks.


7 posted on 08/29/2024 3:39:54 AM PDT by Jonty30 (Genghis Khan did not have the most descendants. His father had more. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

This is the most thermodynamically stupid things I’ve seen in a long time. Electricity and a turning shaft are the highest value energy modes. Turning one of those into low level heat, a low value energy, without doing something more useful on the way is damn near criminal.


8 posted on 08/29/2024 4:16:37 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

I’m no engineer, but it seems like pairing these with nuclear electric power would be very low cost and efficient.


9 posted on 08/29/2024 4:50:16 AM PDT by IncPen ("Inside of every progressive is a Totalitarian screaming to get out" ~ David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

“This is the most thermodynamically stupid things I’ve seen in a long time.”

I agree. ALL Heat pumps EASILY beat 100% efficiency (in all but very cold conditions) if you consider define efficiency as Heat Out (in Watts) divided by Electricity In (also in Watts). They do this by removing heat from the air and dumping it outside, rather than simply turning the electricity into heat.

For example, this Heat Pump Water Heater (essentially what we’re looking at here) claims an efficiency of 450% (or more) - on the high end, but probably true, at least during 70 degree days.

https://blog.rheem.com.au/blog/what-does-coefficient-of-performance-cop-mean-on-a-heat-pump-water-heater/

The REAL QUESTION when you read these articles is whether these new technologies appear to offer enough ‘benefit’ to fool Congress, or the White House, well enough to get funding (obviously a bit of ‘lobbying’ helps smooth the process)...as that’s all they offer (think Solyndra).


10 posted on 08/29/2024 6:04:11 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BobL

There is amazing stupidity in governments for this sort of nonsense. And in voting populations.

In short, I think you’ve nailed it with your last paragraph.


11 posted on 08/29/2024 6:46:52 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Absolutely. And ever try to keep a bunch of rocks hot to 1500 degrees? Not so easy, unless you have a volcano that you can tap into. This is among the SILLIEST ideas that I’ve seen yet.


12 posted on 08/29/2024 6:56:28 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Moving rocks around takes a lot of diesel fuel and a lot of carbon.

More nuclear power, if you want carbon free electricity, and natural gas generators to fill in the peak load.

Solar and wind and hot rocks are children’s toys.


13 posted on 08/29/2024 7:48:09 AM PDT by Titus-Maximus (Tthe trouble with socialism is that you soon run out of other people's zoo animals to eat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

Maybe, but once installed do you save enough money to pay for the installation? If so, then it’s worth doing.

The carbon is a non-issue with me, but you might be able to save enough on carbon to pay for that as well over the long-term.


14 posted on 08/29/2024 8:50:25 PM PDT by Jonty30 (Genghis Khan did not have the most descendants. His father had more. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson