Skip to comments.
How a Federal Court in New Orleans Is Driving the Conservative Agenda
The New York Times ^
| Aug. 26, 2024, 5:08 p.m. ET
| Mattathias Schwartz
Posted on 08/26/2024 3:05:35 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The Supreme Court term that ended this summer delivered a number of big wins for traditional conservative causes. The court made it easier to challenge federal regulations. It made it harder to prosecute former presidents. And it delivered another decision that expanded the rights of gun enthusiasts.
Those rulings left no doubt that the court, with a six-justice supermajority that had already upended abortion rights and affirmative action, is the most ideologically conservative Supreme Court since the early 1930s.
Yet it is almost certainly not the most conservative federal court in the country.
About 1,000 miles away, in New Orleans, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has turned its corner of the federal judiciary into a proving ground for some of the most aggressive conservative arguments in American law. Six of the 17 judges were nominated by former president Donald J. Trump, who has vowed to continue transforming the federal judiciary with further nominations if elected again in November.
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years — including Dobbs v. Jackson, which ended a 49-year right to abortion — it was the Fifth Circuit that first ruled on the case, teeing it up for Supreme Court review and a seismic moment in American law and politics. And in the Supreme Court’s upcoming term, which begins in early October, the justices have agreed to hear five more cases from the Fifth Circuit, including a challenge to regulating so-called ghost guns.<>
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS:
...gun enthusiasts... Is that something like "abortion enthusiasts?"
To: E. Pluribus Unum
In the ‘70s, the New York Times did a decent job of portraying itself as the “paper of record”. It was all a facade, of course, but a well-executed one.
The overt cheerleading, censoring, and unconcealed partisanship of the present New York Times makes it read more like The Guardian.
2
posted on
08/26/2024 3:09:57 PM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
To: E. Pluribus Unum
And all the other Federal Courts are driving the communist agenda.
3
posted on
08/26/2024 3:12:23 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Remember! A vote for the Voo Doo Hoo Doo and Timmy is a vote for another four years of Kenyan BS.)
To: FlingWingFlyer
The 9th 4th 2nd for sure.
To: Dr. Sivana
Is there anything like a federal legal notice in the NYT?
I think county paper of record = where legal notices are published. For instance, obituaries - claimants have one year after the obituary is published to file a claim against the estate (time limit may vary by state).
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The Court did not "expand gunrights". The Court restored rights protected by the Second Amendment.
The NYTs is correct when the imply the Court was taken over by ideological Progressives, who disdain the Constitution, in the 1930's.
6
posted on
08/26/2024 4:23:40 PM PDT
by
marktwain
(The Republic is at risk. Resistance to the Democratic Party is Resistance to Tyranny. )
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson