Posted on 08/04/2024 8:57:40 PM PDT by pigeoninthepark
So here are a couple of ideas I thought of recently, using tactics from "Rules for Radicals" which was not meant just for leftist movements but any opposition movement:
*when talking about abortion or illegal immigration, say "every illegal immigrant should abort every pregnancy they have". The leftist would never agree to that, their only choices would be saying no, which allows you to accuse them of opposing abortion, or they will call you racist, in which case you tell them that a fetus is not a person so you cannot be racist against it.
*Removing illegal aliens is "de-colonization"
*When someone falsely says Russia invaded Ukraine for no reason, say the Russian army are "undocumented migrants" and that borders are just lines on a map and racist
*When talking about feminism or Islam, say "Islam is right about women" because if they agree then you accuse them of hating women's rights and if they disagree accuse them of being islamophobic
Feel free to add your own
you can’t because as soon as you do they change it again.
That’s the point in a way, once they cannot use an argument they gotta make up something new but every new buzzword is more retarded than the last one
These are similar tactics to what I use.
Nice.
I like it.
I’ve stated that if the black fetus is not human, or just a clump of cells, it wouldn’t matter who slaughters the fetus.....THE KKK OR PLANNED PARENTHOOD....The reason I say this is because the “”black CEO of PP admitted Sanger and her thugs were racist...Dems and progressives support PP....Have they stopped being racist ???if not, you are the new KKK.... Alexis Johnson admitted in the new York times in the op-ed section on April 17th,2021 that Sanger was racist ANNNNND PP WAS STILL RACIST AFTER SHE DIED......BIG QUESTION .....WHEN DID PP STOP BEING RACIST???????
Easy enough to counter “all pregnant illegal immigrants should have abortions.”
The leftists will reply that you are depriving women of the choice to continue their pregnancies. The leftistsclaim to be pro-choice not pro-abortion.
These are strong, logical arguments, but they often fall short when faced with illogical individuals.
“Islam is right about women.”
Counter: Islam granted women formal rights when they had none. Muslims vary in their beliefs and practices and Muslim countries vary in their laws.
“The leftists will reply that you are depriving women of the choice to continue their pregnancies. The leftistsclaim to be pro-choice not pro-abortion.”
Ok here is a better argument: white women should not be allowed to have abortions because of their white privilege, every resource a white woman uses to have an abortion could be used by an underprivileged woman of color instead
“Counter: Islam granted women formal rights when they had none. Muslims vary in their beliefs and practices and Muslim countries vary in their laws.”
Not a likely argument they will use because that would show division among Muslims and according to leftists all non-whites love each other
Some Muslims are white. Leftists don’t claim all non-whites love each other.
Having differences in religious practice doesn’t mean people hate each other.
Your arguments aren’t really stumpers, and if they were stumpers, it doesn’t mean that your opponent would recognize that or be convinced by the arguments.
It’s just a way of scoring points against them, at least in your own mind. Satisfying but not productive.
When someone falsely says Russia invaded Ukraine for no reason…
-
Blew your credibility there, bozo.
Call them Heterophobes when they try to talk about “Gay Rights”
If women have a right to abort babies because it’s their body and they have the right to do whatever they want with it... ask them this:
If a man wants to rape a woman why is that a problem? It’s his body and he has the right to do whatever he wants to do with it.
They will say, “but that right doesn’t exist if it negatively affects someone else.”
Answer: So abortion has to be wrong since it affects, actually ends, the life of the unborn baby.
Waste of time talking to idiots!
“These are strong, logical arguments, but they often fall short when faced with illogical individuals.”
I know. We’re at the point where just kicking the shit out of them is more effective and feels better too. Why waste time and breath trying to reason with imbeciles when a quick kick in the teeth gets your point across.
It’s a good idea, with some qualification.
Keep in mind that these tactics were used long before Alinsky, so he doesn’t really get any credit.
Also keep in mind that Alinsky did these things apart from God. When we do them, we have the Spirit of God Almighty, our Creator.
Nobody cares what loser neocons think
Yes, like putting lipstick 💄 on a pig 🐷.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.