Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden May Soon Announce Plans to Permanently Alter Supreme Court
American Thinker ^ | 29 Jul, 2024 | Eric Lendrum

Posted on 07/29/2024 9:15:48 AM PDT by MtnClimber

On Monday, Joe Biden allegedly plans to announce several dramatic new proposals to permanently change the nature of the Supreme Court, in an unprecedented assault on the Constitution.

Politico reports that the reforms, first hinted at during Biden’s Oval Office address to the nation last week on his historic decision not to run for re-election, will include term limits for Supreme Court justices and a new code of ethics, among other radical proposals.

“I’m going to call for Supreme Court reform, because this is critical to our democracy,” said Biden during his widely-panned address, when the 81-year-old president once again appeared tired, dazed, and repeatedly stammered and lost his train of thought as he spoke.

Two anonymous sources told Politico that, in addition to radically reforming the Supreme Court, Biden will also attempt to pursue a constitutional amendment significantly reducing presidential immunity. This effort is in direct response to the Supreme Court’s ruling on July 1st granting broad immunity to former President Donald Trump with regards to the various criminal prosecutions against him related to actions he took while in office.

Biden may announce the initiative during an upcoming trip to the Lyndon B. Johnson presidential library in Austin, Texas. Although the White House did not offer an official statement on the matter, Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre previously said on Thursday that Biden “believes if you are serving in high office, you should be held to a transparency, accountability and you should be held to a high ethics.”

However, any such radical proposals would first have to pass through Congress, where Republicans control the House of Representatives and Democrats control the Senate. Furthermore, any measure must reach 60 votes in the Senate in order to overcome the filibuster. Similarly, a constitutional amendment would have to be approved by two-thirds of both chambers of Congress, or from a constitutional convention called by two-thirds of all states and supported by three-fourths of all state legislatures.

Biden and top Democrats have increasingly turned against the very institution of the Supreme Court following the confirmation of a 6-3 conservative majority under Trump’s first term. The court has since issued landmark rulings on abortion, gun rights, affirmative action, presidential immunity, and the January 6th criminal cases, among many others. Some Democrats, including Congressman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), have called for “packing” the Supreme Court by adding at least three more justices, in order to give the court a new, but artificial, liberal majority.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: courtpacking; lameduck; leftism; noauthority; scotus; tampering
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
Sounds like he is attempting to do what FDR tried but failed to do in the 1930s.

Yes, FDR tried to pack the court. I don't think he tried term limits or specific ethics rule changes.

21 posted on 07/29/2024 9:29:02 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

No, the numbers have changed over the years, but there is no term or age limits. As a matter of fact it is specific regarding it being a lifetime appointment.


22 posted on 07/29/2024 9:29:23 AM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

And, Biden does not seem to realize the irony of trying to impose ethics requirements on the Supreme Court.


23 posted on 07/29/2024 9:30:35 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
Biden May Soon Announce Plans to Permanently Alter Supreme Court.

Someone needs to tell the one occupying the White House that the U.S. President is not a King.

24 posted on 07/29/2024 9:32:33 AM PDT by JesusIsLord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Joe is now a lame duck. Nothings going to happen except the steady stream of ice cream. He’s done.


25 posted on 07/29/2024 9:37:28 AM PDT by DownInFlames (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobrlbob

An empty gesture by the lamest duck.


26 posted on 07/29/2024 9:38:15 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (לעזאזל עם חמאס)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames

Nothing says lame duck like empty gestures!


27 posted on 07/29/2024 9:38:50 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (לעזאזל עם חמאס)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Biden can’t get the lid off a puddin cup. 🙄


28 posted on 07/29/2024 9:40:17 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MileHi

“DOS”

Oh...you meant biden’s ridiculous proposal.


29 posted on 07/29/2024 9:43:59 AM PDT by Leep (She cackles in you general direction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MileHi

“DOA”

Oh...you meant biden’s ridiculous proposal.


30 posted on 07/29/2024 9:45:30 AM PDT by Leep (She cackles in you general direction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DFG
The RATs know this will be DOA in the House. This is a campaign tactic.

Precisely. This is only a move to stir an uneducated and gullible base for votes.

Any changes will need a constitutional amendment passage, it cannot be legislated by congress nor decreed by the idiot in chief (although he may try. Nothing is more dangerous politically than a lame duck).

31 posted on 07/29/2024 9:45:32 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Biden’s puppet masters continuously fling sheeit up against the wall to see if it sticks.

Instead of following the Constitution of the United States those Marxists are always in search of the workaround...

And anyone who subscribes to that type of procedural government is a Marxist as well.


32 posted on 07/29/2024 9:46:44 AM PDT by Clutch Martin ("The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I think everyone who votes for Trump should get a free AR 15 and 1000 rounds of 5.56.

That’s my election puplicity stunt.


33 posted on 07/29/2024 9:48:45 AM PDT by right way right (“May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our only true hope”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Old news. Biden DID announce his “plans” today.

“term limits” (constitutional amendment)

a legislated “code of conduct” (congress makes its own, but somehow Biden does not think its fair that SCOTUS makes its own)

another constitutional amendment removing presidential immunity

The chances of any of it becomg law are NIL and Biden knows it. He is merely making a set of Dim campaign talking points, nothing more.


34 posted on 07/29/2024 9:49:17 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I’m stuck... what’s the word for when I leader makes up his own rules for everyone else?


35 posted on 07/29/2024 9:50:04 AM PDT by strange1 ("Show the enemy harm so he shall not advance" Sun Tzu The Art of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Biden? Is he still around? I thought Kamala was President now...


36 posted on 07/29/2024 9:50:15 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I don’t think that the number of Supreme Court justices is called out in the Constitution”

It’s not. This can be done by simple majorities in both Houses. The vote to end debate takes 2/3. The 2/3 requirement can be eliminated by a simple majority. Manchin and Sinema kept this from happening two years ago. Were it not for them the SC would already be gone and Trump would be in jail.


37 posted on 07/29/2024 9:50:42 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JesusIsLord

He can try it but the court will render it unconstitutional and void.


38 posted on 07/29/2024 9:53:12 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (. War is Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Soon to be dictator Joebama becomes dictator for one month before the Grim Reaper comes a-callin”.


39 posted on 07/29/2024 9:54:04 AM PDT by Colt1851Navy (What was wrong with Nixon?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

40 posted on 07/29/2024 10:02:57 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson