Posted on 07/19/2024 1:59:12 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
Audio Analysis is 100% Clear…Trump & Crowd were shot by two separate People (Shooters) at different distances and possibly different caliber bullets…
(Excerpt) Read more at youtu.be ...
FR PSA: Ignore the (usual) govt plants.
4’ riser..
The 2 men who got critically wounded-—IIRC—abdomen shots==
THEY should have BULLETS from the surgeries to use for evidence.
Trump’s bullet-—where did it end up???
The firefighter who got shot in the head==NO bullet???
AND——IS THERE ALWAYS SUCH SENSITIVE AUDIO EQUIPMENT AT EVERY POLITICAL RALLY ???????????
Good movie!
Who said the others shot had “abdomen shots? One was grabbing his arm.
Re: sensitive audio equipment ... today’s phone have some of the most advanced audio “equipment” out there.
did you not see they wrote “IIRC” ?
“DiEugenio is a very smart guy and straight shooter.”
No doubt! Coast to Coast only hosts the best!
Take time to watch this video.
Things are getting quite interesting.
I've had a chance to studio the audio a bit now, and I think he's making a mistake in counting the shots in the second grouping. He says there are five. I don't think so. Each shot has two distinct sounds. Shockwave and muzzle blast.
In the first grouping they are easy to pick out because the shots are spaced out more. But in the second grouping he's firing faster and it runs together. There are still these two signals for each, but they guy on the video is calling some of them extra shots.
There are not five shots. And by identifying the wrong shots, he's getting the wrong spacing between the shockwave and the muzzleblast, which makes him think there's a different weapon. But it's just misidentifying the signals.
“He goes where the evidence takes him.”
What evidence exists that JFK wound photos are forged?
What evidence exists that the ‘gaping exit wound at the back of his head’ was surgically modified to look like an entry wound?
Without leads there are no answers.
The investigation will prove the bystanders indeed were shot by Crooks rifle. Unfortunately they were not able to recover the bullet that grazed Trumps ear.
What I find odd is nothing about gun control going crazy right now. There is nothing about the actual rifle Crooks had in his possession. No pictures of the rifle laying on rooftop or rounds loaded in the mag.
There is no mention of what ammo was purchased that morning either. It was confirmed Crooks bought a box. But so far nobody has divulged what caliber.
If Crooks was only shooting a 22LR AR clone rifle, this surely will put a kink in the investigation.
“The shot I saw of Trumps head and the passing bullet looked incredibly level. Like the shot wasn’t from an elevated position. Just speculation on my part.”
Consider:
that Trump was on a platform putting his head over 12 feet elevated.
The building has a low roof. Less than 20 feet at peak.
Building is sited on ground lower than Trump’s platform.
What I find odd is nothing about gun control going crazy right now.
Biden calls for ban on gun used to shoot Trump
Not a winning campaign on the left or right?
I think he got six shots off, in two groups of three. But I'm not 100% about that. It is somewhat possible the second grouping came from someone else, like law enforcement, but I doubt it.
The elevated position was not on a tall building, Trump was on a stage, and there was a good distance between them. The angle didn’t need to be very great.
The point is, you don't stop there. "Who benefits" does not reveal the solution to a crime.
He doesn't though. He's kind of a quack.
“This means the shot was taken from a LOWER position ... as in INSIDE that building.”
Consider that the building ground level is lower than Trumps ground level
“Or the building sits on lower ground!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.