Posted on 07/19/2024 1:59:12 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
Audio Analysis is 100% Clear…Trump & Crowd were shot by two separate People (Shooters) at different distances and possibly different caliber bullets…
(Excerpt) Read more at youtu.be ...
They aren’t assumptions. How did you come to judge these other people as experts?
Local LE said they fired shots.
That comment was before I'd done a fuller analysis and found other sources. I agree, LE fired shots. Six came from Crooks. Three from other sources.
But that second grouping was of four shots. Three of them were from Crooks.
That's a link to a book. It's not a primary source, it would have to be citing something. What is its source?
The witnesses were interviewed in 1963 and 64. Nobody saw Oswald at the time of the shooting until he was seen in the breakroom afterwards.
If that were true, then why is Trump alive? What happened to the mysterious second shooter? Where was that person shooting from because it certainly was at the water tower that person would’ve been caught immediately
Everything’s got to be a conspiracy theory too many armchair, experts, trying to talk about something they really don’t know much about.
The sources for the book are primary documents—witness testimony that was taken by the FBI, were given to the Warren Report and were released in the past few years.
The book will walk you through it document by document, step by step, witness account by witness account.
None of course. In fact, the HSCA proved they were not forged. Yet people still spout that stuff, and a lot of other stuff that was disproven long ago.
"What evidence exists that the ‘gaping exit wound at the back of his head’ was surgically modified to look like an entry wound?"
That's got to be one of the dumbest theories ever promoted.
Which primary documents for this specific claim?
The Warren Commission files that were not published in the 1960s are the primary documents.
Many have been released in the past few years.
The witness testimony of several witnesses is the primary documents.
They are all included in the book.
Read it.
Interesting, watch to the end. The lone gunman theory is BS.
One Word: Patsy
I’m not reading DiEugenio’s book. Honestly, I’ve only read a few of them. Not how I want to spend my time. But I’m familiar with DiEugenio. I’ve had contact with him. DiEugenio has even cited me, over something he and I happen to agree about. But DiEugenio is a well known conspiracy nut. If he gets something right it’s just a lucky coincidence.
If you want to tell me what primary sources he’s using for this claim, I’ll look at them.
I have not seen this one. I’m happy to take a look at a different analysis. Thanks.
“In any case, glad there are some intelligent people outside the gov’t who are doing some serious analysis. “
Certainly not Chris Martensen! He is either incompetent or deliberately omitting a fact that would destroy hid analysis.
“THat depends. He claims that the first shot came from ground level, and not from that rooftop. An upward trajectory might have caught both Trump that the other man. Personally, I think he made that claim to bolster his theory that both were hit with the same bullet, because if the bullet was fired from the rooftop the trajectory couldn’t have hit both men.”
You falsely assume (or just didn’t think) that their is no Slope to the terrain from the building to Trump’s platform.
“That Oswald was on the second floor making change for a dollar when the shots were fired.”
No one reported seeing Oswald at the time of the shooting ...
“Several co-workers confirmed that. They and Oswald rushed to the window to see what the loud noises were.”
Which coworkers?
Nope. Picking out sounds because he thinks they "sound" wrong, then building everything off that. Doesn't work that way.
https://www.amazon.com/JFK-Assassination-Chokeholds-Prove-Conspiracy/dp/B0CMTHBLDL
Read the book—it has the names for you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.