Posted on 07/19/2024 1:59:12 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
Audio Analysis is 100% Clear…Trump & Crowd were shot by two separate People (Shooters) at different distances and possibly different caliber bullets…
(Excerpt) Read more at youtu.be ...
In America the accused have the right to remain silent as well as the right to speak in their defense.
Is there any electronic record or even a written record of notes taken during the twelve hours Oswald was interrogated?
You are exactly right the case was closed and the cover-up complete in less than 48 hours after Oswald was arrested.
A self-proclaimed patsy was accused, tracked down, arrested, arraigned, convicted, and executed.
The best cover-up is a frame job.
The best frame job is when the guy framed is dead.
That is the beauty of the recent attempt on Trump.
The twenty year old dietary assistant at a nursing home was both a shooter and a patsy.
He was a dead man shooting as he was scoped by counter snipers who allowed to get off eight shots before he was forever silenced.
” It is somewhat possible the second grouping came from someone else, like law enforcement, but I doubt it.”
Local LE said they fired shots.
“Or the building sits on lower ground!
Or, maybe it DOESN’T gov’t plant troll.
Well yes they would. If you could trust the ones doing the investigation. And we all know that they cannot be trusted. So we will most likely never know the truth if there was more than one shooter.
“Or, maybe it DOESN’T gov’t plant troll.”
Grow up troll. Amazing how trolls go with personal insults when they get facts that they don’t like.
You’re the troll.
You have a long history of being one.
So, take your distraction posts and buzz off.
Topo maps show less than one foot difference between distance ground elevations.
So, a shooter from INSIDE the building, shooting “up”, towards elevated podium/head, is significant.
Govt trolls most disappointed. 😭
Blakey now says it was a conspiracy & they had more than just the audio info. So no, it was just not the audio info.
Yep. It was Bigfoot and Elvis. I seen it on a newspaper in the checkout lane at Wall Mart.
“Ballistics would prove that...right? They have the bullets.”
^
This is my field of study—that is being ravaged by Obama-era lawyering.
Let me just say that 223 caliber bullets are prone to damaging impacts which make Forensic Ballistics difficult. Longer pathways improve chances of identification, but fragmentation interferes with determining just how many bullets were collected.
“I still doubt we’ll ever know exactly what happened and who all might have been involved.”
^
I expect a study will be completed, but it’ll take months before it appears in a (my) peer-reviewed journal.
I want that SCARIEST PERSON...CHEATLE...AS FAR AWAY FROM ANYTHING THAT HAPPENED.
SHE EPITOMIZES HATE, EVIL, COVER UP AND SHE SHOULD BE NO WHERE NEAR ANY INVESTIGATION.
PUT HER IN A ROOM, LOCK THE DOOR AND PROCEDE WITH THE INVESTIGATION.
SHE IS THE SPOOKIEST PERSON...LET ALONE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE...I HAVE EVER SEEN. SHE REEKS OF CORRUPTION.
I don’t remember. Either Bongino or Clint Russel or some podcast.
I know what Blakey says. He was a mafia prosecutor before the committee and he went in with that bias. But he's wrong, and I've told him he was wrong. It's provable.
Before the audio evidence they had already drafted the final report. It said no conspiracy, three shots fired from behind, from the book depository, by Oswald. After the audio evidence it changed to say all that, plus, one shot from the grassy knoll that missed. That's the change.
There was no other evidence added. There was nothing prior to the audio evidence that convinced them of a conspiracy. It was the audio evidence. He's wrong and just trying to justify his results.
I’ve had a chance to do a little more analysis, and pulled a third recording.
When Crooks fires, there is a shockwave followed by a muzzle blast. The gap varies between 0.21 and 0.22 seconds, averaging 0.215. There’s also a consistent echo of the shockwave at 0.122 seconds. These facts create a fingerprint that allows the identification of his shots on the recording.
The video at the source says there was a burst of five shots, but he didn’t properly identify everything and he’s counting at least one as two shots.
Crooks fired six shots. Counting seconds from his first shot they are at: 0, 0.86, 1.54 seconds in the first grouping. The second grouping they are at: 4.32, 4.58, 5.09. He’s firing at double the rate of the first group. Gets three shots off in 0.77 seconds.
There is a shot between Crooks’ 5th and 6th shots, obviously, not from him. It’s a rifle shot and there’s a different shockwave precedence.
Later, at 5.8 seconds, there’s another shot, from some different source. This is after that second grouping and Crooks has already stopped firing. Then much later there’s a third non-Crooks shot at 15.8 seconds.
There are nine shots on the recording. Crooks fired six of them. My assumption would be that law enforcement fired the other three at Crooks. Probably one of the last two unknown shots killed him.
I expect, when we get a full report, it will say that three people fired back at Crooks. The mere presence of shots that didn’t come from Crooks, in these circumstances, does not imply a second assassin. But we’ll have to wait and see what the investigation produces.
I’ll take Blakey’s word over a random internet poster every day. He knows more about the case than you ever will, by a long shot.
I know it looks that way to you, but that’s kind of funny.
BTW, I was giving my word. I was citing facts. You can check them.
was=wasn’t
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.